Theory HOL-Analysis.Product_Topology

section‹The binary product topology›

theory Product_Topology
  imports Function_Topology
begin

section ‹Product Topology›

subsection‹Definition›

definition prod_topology :: "'a topology ⇒ 'b topology ⇒ ('a × 'b) topology" where
 "prod_topology X Y ≡ topology (arbitrary union_of (λU. U ∈ {S × T |S T. openin X S ∧ openin Y T}))"

lemma open_product_open:
  assumes "open A"
  shows "∃𝒰. 𝒰 ⊆ {S × T |S T. open S ∧ open T} ∧ ⋃ 𝒰 = A"
proof -
  obtain f g where *: "⋀u. u ∈ A ⟹ open (f u) ∧ open (g u) ∧ u ∈ (f u) × (g u) ∧ (f u) × (g u) ⊆ A"
    using open_prod_def [of A] assms by metis
  let ?𝒰 = "(λu. f u × g u) ` A"
  show ?thesis
    by (rule_tac x="?𝒰" in exI) (auto simp: dest: *)
qed

lemma open_product_open_eq: "(arbitrary union_of (λU. ∃S T. U = S × T ∧ open S ∧ open T)) = open"
  by (force simp: union_of_def arbitrary_def intro: open_product_open open_Times)

lemma openin_prod_topology:
   "openin (prod_topology X Y) = arbitrary union_of (λU. U ∈ {S × T |S T. openin X S ∧ openin Y T})"
  unfolding prod_topology_def
proof (rule topology_inverse')
  show "istopology (arbitrary union_of (λU. U ∈ {S × T |S T. openin X S ∧ openin Y T}))"
    apply (rule istopology_base, simp)
    by (metis openin_Int Times_Int_Times)
qed

lemma topspace_prod_topology [simp]:
   "topspace (prod_topology X Y) = topspace X × topspace Y"
proof -
  have "topspace(prod_topology X Y) = ⋃ (Collect (openin (prod_topology X Y)))" (is "_ = ?Z")
    unfolding topspace_def ..
  also have "… = topspace X × topspace Y"
  proof
    show "?Z ⊆ topspace X × topspace Y"
      apply (auto simp: openin_prod_topology union_of_def arbitrary_def)
      using openin_subset by force+
  next
    have *: "∃A B. topspace X × topspace Y = A × B ∧ openin X A ∧ openin Y B"
      by blast
    show "topspace X × topspace Y ⊆ ?Z"
      apply (rule Union_upper)
      using * by (simp add: openin_prod_topology arbitrary_union_of_inc)
  qed
  finally show ?thesis .
qed

lemma prod_topology_trivial_iff [simp]:
  "prod_topology X Y = trivial_topology ⟷ X = trivial_topology ∨ Y = trivial_topology"
  by (metis (full_types) Sigma_empty1 null_topspace_iff_trivial subset_empty times_subset_iff topspace_prod_topology)

lemma subtopology_Times:
  shows "subtopology (prod_topology X Y) (S × T) = prod_topology (subtopology X S) (subtopology Y T)"
proof -
  have "((λU. ∃S T. U = S × T ∧ openin X S ∧ openin Y T) relative_to S × T) =
        (λU. ∃S' T'. U = S' × T' ∧ (openin X relative_to S) S' ∧ (openin Y relative_to T) T')"
    by (auto simp: relative_to_def Times_Int_Times fun_eq_iff) metis
  then show ?thesis
    by (simp add: topology_eq openin_prod_topology arbitrary_union_of_relative_to flip: openin_relative_to)
qed

lemma prod_topology_subtopology:
    "prod_topology (subtopology X S) Y = subtopology (prod_topology X Y) (S × topspace Y)"
    "prod_topology X (subtopology Y T) = subtopology (prod_topology X Y) (topspace X × T)"
by (auto simp: subtopology_Times)

lemma prod_topology_discrete_topology:
     "discrete_topology (S × T) = prod_topology (discrete_topology S) (discrete_topology T)"
  by (auto simp: discrete_topology_unique openin_prod_topology intro: arbitrary_union_of_inc)

lemma prod_topology_euclidean [simp]: "prod_topology euclidean euclidean = euclidean"
  by (simp add: prod_topology_def open_product_open_eq)

lemma prod_topology_subtopology_eu [simp]:
  "prod_topology (subtopology euclidean S) (subtopology euclidean T) = subtopology euclidean (S × T)"
  by (simp add: prod_topology_subtopology subtopology_subtopology Times_Int_Times)

lemma openin_prod_topology_alt:
     "openin (prod_topology X Y) S ⟷
      (∀x y. (x,y) ∈ S ⟶ (∃U V. openin X U ∧ openin Y V ∧ x ∈ U ∧ y ∈ V ∧ U × V ⊆ S))"
  apply (auto simp: openin_prod_topology arbitrary_union_of_alt, fastforce)
  by (metis mem_Sigma_iff)

lemma open_map_fst: "open_map (prod_topology X Y) X fst"
  unfolding open_map_def openin_prod_topology_alt
  by (force simp: openin_subopen [of X "fst ` _"] intro: subset_fst_imageI)

lemma open_map_snd: "open_map (prod_topology X Y) Y snd"
  unfolding open_map_def openin_prod_topology_alt
  by (force simp: openin_subopen [of Y "snd ` _"] intro: subset_snd_imageI)

lemma openin_prod_Times_iff:
     "openin (prod_topology X Y) (S × T) ⟷ S = {} ∨ T = {} ∨ openin X S ∧ openin Y T"
proof (cases "S = {} ∨ T = {}")
  case False
  then show ?thesis
    apply (simp add: openin_prod_topology_alt openin_subopen [of X S] openin_subopen [of Y T] times_subset_iff, safe)
      apply (meson|force)+
    done
qed force


lemma closure_of_Times:
   "(prod_topology X Y) closure_of (S × T) = (X closure_of S) × (Y closure_of T)"  (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
  show "?lhs ⊆ ?rhs"
    by (clarsimp simp: closure_of_def openin_prod_topology_alt) blast
  show "?rhs ⊆ ?lhs"
    by (clarsimp simp: closure_of_def openin_prod_topology_alt) (meson SigmaI subsetD)
qed

lemma closedin_prod_Times_iff:
   "closedin (prod_topology X Y) (S × T) ⟷ S = {} ∨ T = {} ∨ closedin X S ∧ closedin Y T"
  by (auto simp: closure_of_Times times_eq_iff simp flip: closure_of_eq)

lemma interior_of_Times: "(prod_topology X Y) interior_of (S × T) = (X interior_of S) × (Y interior_of T)"
proof (rule interior_of_unique)
  show "(X interior_of S) × Y interior_of T ⊆ S × T"
    by (simp add: Sigma_mono interior_of_subset)
  show "openin (prod_topology X Y) ((X interior_of S) × Y interior_of T)"
    by (simp add: openin_prod_Times_iff)
next
  show "T' ⊆ (X interior_of S) × Y interior_of T" if "T' ⊆ S × T" "openin (prod_topology X Y) T'" for T'
  proof (clarsimp; intro conjI)
    fix a :: "'a" and b :: "'b"
    assume "(a, b) ∈ T'"
    with that obtain U V where UV: "openin X U" "openin Y V" "a ∈ U" "b ∈ V" "U × V ⊆ T'"
      by (metis openin_prod_topology_alt)
    then show "a ∈ X interior_of S"
      using interior_of_maximal_eq that(1) by fastforce
    show "b ∈ Y interior_of T"
      using UV interior_of_maximal_eq that(1)
      by (metis SigmaI mem_Sigma_iff subset_eq)
  qed
qed

text ‹Missing the opposite direction. Does it hold? A converse is proved for proper maps, a stronger condition›
lemma closed_map_prod:
  assumes "closed_map (prod_topology X Y) (prod_topology X' Y') (λ(x,y). (f x, g y))"
  shows "(prod_topology X Y) = trivial_topology ∨ closed_map X X' f ∧ closed_map Y Y' g"
proof (cases "(prod_topology X Y) = trivial_topology")
  case False
  then have ne: "topspace X ≠ {}" "topspace Y ≠ {}"
    by (auto simp flip: null_topspace_iff_trivial)
  have "closed_map X X' f"
    unfolding closed_map_def
  proof (intro strip)
    fix C
    assume "closedin X C"
    show "closedin X' (f ` C)"
    proof (cases "C={}")
      case False
      with assms have "closedin (prod_topology X' Y') ((λ(x,y). (f x, g y)) ` (C × topspace Y))"
        by (simp add: ‹closedin X C› closed_map_def closedin_prod_Times_iff)
      with False ne show ?thesis
        by (simp add: image_paired_Times closedin_Times closedin_prod_Times_iff)
    qed auto
  qed
  moreover
  have "closed_map Y Y' g"
    unfolding closed_map_def
  proof (intro strip)
    fix C
    assume "closedin Y C"
    show "closedin Y' (g ` C)"
    proof (cases "C={}")
      case False
      with assms have "closedin (prod_topology X' Y') ((λ(x,y). (f x, g y)) ` (topspace X × C))"
        by (simp add: ‹closedin Y C› closed_map_def closedin_prod_Times_iff)
      with False ne show ?thesis
        by (simp add: image_paired_Times closedin_Times closedin_prod_Times_iff)
    qed auto
  qed
  ultimately show ?thesis
    by (auto simp: False)
qed auto

subsection ‹Continuity›

lemma continuous_map_pairwise:
   "continuous_map Z (prod_topology X Y) f ⟷ continuous_map Z X (fst ∘ f) ∧ continuous_map Z Y (snd ∘ f)"
   (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof -
  let ?g = "fst ∘ f" and ?h = "snd ∘ f"
  have f: "f x = (?g x, ?h x)" for x
    by auto
  show ?thesis
  proof (cases "?g ∈ topspace Z → topspace X ∧ ?h ∈ topspace Z → topspace Y")
    case True
    show ?thesis
    proof safe
      assume "continuous_map Z (prod_topology X Y) f"
      then have "openin Z {x ∈ topspace Z. fst (f x) ∈ U}" if "openin X U" for U
        unfolding continuous_map_def using True that
        apply clarify
        apply (drule_tac x="U × topspace Y" in spec)
        by (auto simp: openin_prod_Times_iff mem_Times_iff Pi_iff cong: conj_cong)
      with True show "continuous_map Z X (fst ∘ f)"
        by (auto simp: continuous_map_def)
    next
      assume "continuous_map Z (prod_topology X Y) f"
      then have "openin Z {x ∈ topspace Z. snd (f x) ∈ V}" if "openin Y V" for V
        unfolding continuous_map_def using True that
        apply clarify
        apply (drule_tac x="topspace X × V" in spec)
        by (simp add: openin_prod_Times_iff mem_Times_iff Pi_iff cong: conj_cong)
      with True show "continuous_map Z Y (snd ∘ f)"
        by (auto simp: continuous_map_def)
    next
      assume Z: "continuous_map Z X (fst ∘ f)" "continuous_map Z Y (snd ∘ f)"
      have *: "openin Z {x ∈ topspace Z. f x ∈ W}"
        if "⋀w. w ∈ W ⟹ ∃U V. openin X U ∧ openin Y V ∧ w ∈ U × V ∧ U × V ⊆ W" for W
      proof (subst openin_subopen, clarify)
        fix x :: "'a"
        assume "x ∈ topspace Z" and "f x ∈ W"
        with that [OF ‹f x ∈ W›]
        obtain U V where UV: "openin X U" "openin Y V" "f x ∈ U × V" "U × V ⊆ W"
          by auto
        with Z  UV show "∃T. openin Z T ∧ x ∈ T ∧ T ⊆ {x ∈ topspace Z. f x ∈ W}"
          apply (rule_tac x="{x ∈ topspace Z. ?g x ∈ U} ∩ {x ∈ topspace Z. ?h x ∈ V}" in exI)
          apply (auto simp: ‹x ∈ topspace Z› continuous_map_def)
          done
      qed
      show "continuous_map Z (prod_topology X Y) f"
        using True by (force simp: continuous_map_def openin_prod_topology_alt mem_Times_iff *)
    qed
  qed (force simp: continuous_map_def)
qed

lemma continuous_map_paired:
   "continuous_map Z (prod_topology X Y) (λx. (f x,g x)) ⟷ continuous_map Z X f ∧ continuous_map Z Y g"
  by (simp add: continuous_map_pairwise o_def)

lemma continuous_map_pairedI [continuous_intros]:
   "⟦continuous_map Z X f; continuous_map Z Y g⟧ ⟹ continuous_map Z (prod_topology X Y) (λx. (f x,g x))"
  by (simp add: continuous_map_pairwise o_def)

lemma continuous_map_fst [continuous_intros]: "continuous_map (prod_topology X Y) X fst"
  using continuous_map_pairwise [of "prod_topology X Y" X Y id]
  by (simp add: continuous_map_pairwise)

lemma continuous_map_snd [continuous_intros]: "continuous_map (prod_topology X Y) Y snd"
  using continuous_map_pairwise [of "prod_topology X Y" X Y id]
  by (simp add: continuous_map_pairwise)

lemma continuous_map_fst_of [continuous_intros]:
   "continuous_map Z (prod_topology X Y) f ⟹ continuous_map Z X (fst ∘ f)"
  by (simp add: continuous_map_pairwise)

lemma continuous_map_snd_of [continuous_intros]:
   "continuous_map Z (prod_topology X Y) f ⟹ continuous_map Z Y (snd ∘ f)"
  by (simp add: continuous_map_pairwise)
    
lemma continuous_map_prod_fst: 
  "i ∈ I ⟹ continuous_map (prod_topology (product_topology (λi. Y) I) X) Y (λx. fst x i)"
  using continuous_map_componentwise_UNIV continuous_map_fst by fastforce

lemma continuous_map_prod_snd: 
  "i ∈ I ⟹ continuous_map (prod_topology X (product_topology (λi. Y) I)) Y (λx. snd x i)"
  using continuous_map_componentwise_UNIV continuous_map_snd by fastforce

lemma continuous_map_if_iff [simp]: "continuous_map X Y (λx. if P then f x else g x) ⟷ continuous_map X Y (if P then f else g)"
  by simp

lemma continuous_map_if [continuous_intros]: "⟦P ⟹ continuous_map X Y f; ~P ⟹ continuous_map X Y g⟧
      ⟹ continuous_map X Y (λx. if P then f x else g x)"
  by simp

lemma prod_topology_trivial1 [simp]: "prod_topology trivial_topology Y = trivial_topology"
  using continuous_map_fst continuous_map_on_empty2 by blast

lemma prod_topology_trivial2 [simp]: "prod_topology X trivial_topology = trivial_topology"
  using continuous_map_snd continuous_map_on_empty2 by blast

lemma continuous_map_subtopology_fst [continuous_intros]: "continuous_map (subtopology (prod_topology X Y) Z) X fst"
      using continuous_map_from_subtopology continuous_map_fst by force

lemma continuous_map_subtopology_snd [continuous_intros]: "continuous_map (subtopology (prod_topology X Y) Z) Y snd"
      using continuous_map_from_subtopology continuous_map_snd by force

lemma quotient_map_fst [simp]:
   "quotient_map(prod_topology X Y) X fst ⟷ (Y = trivial_topology ⟶ X = trivial_topology)"
  apply (simp add: continuous_open_quotient_map open_map_fst continuous_map_fst)
  by (metis null_topspace_iff_trivial)

lemma quotient_map_snd [simp]:
   "quotient_map(prod_topology X Y) Y snd ⟷ (X = trivial_topology ⟶ Y = trivial_topology)"
  apply (simp add: continuous_open_quotient_map open_map_snd continuous_map_snd)
  by (metis null_topspace_iff_trivial)

lemma retraction_map_fst:
   "retraction_map (prod_topology X Y) X fst ⟷ (Y = trivial_topology ⟶ X = trivial_topology)"
proof (cases "Y = trivial_topology")
  case True
  then show ?thesis
    using continuous_map_image_subset_topspace
    by (auto simp: retraction_map_def retraction_maps_def continuous_map_pairwise)
next
  case False
  have "∃g. continuous_map X (prod_topology X Y) g ∧ (∀x∈topspace X. fst (g x) = x)"
    if y: "y ∈ topspace Y" for y
    by (rule_tac x="λx. (x,y)" in exI) (auto simp: y continuous_map_paired)
  with False have "retraction_map (prod_topology X Y) X fst"
    by (fastforce simp: retraction_map_def retraction_maps_def continuous_map_fst)
  with False show ?thesis
    by simp
qed

lemma retraction_map_snd:
   "retraction_map (prod_topology X Y) Y snd ⟷ (X = trivial_topology ⟶ Y = trivial_topology)"
proof (cases "X = trivial_topology")
  case True
  then show ?thesis
    using continuous_map_image_subset_topspace
    by (fastforce simp: retraction_map_def retraction_maps_def continuous_map_fst)
next
  case False
  have "∃g. continuous_map Y (prod_topology X Y) g ∧ (∀y∈topspace Y. snd (g y) = y)"
    if x: "x ∈ topspace X" for x
    by (rule_tac x="λy. (x,y)" in exI) (auto simp: x continuous_map_paired)
  with False have "retraction_map (prod_topology X Y) Y snd"
    by (fastforce simp: retraction_map_def retraction_maps_def continuous_map_snd)
  with False show ?thesis
    by simp
qed


lemma continuous_map_of_fst:
   "continuous_map (prod_topology X Y) Z (f ∘ fst) ⟷ Y = trivial_topology ∨ continuous_map X Z f"
proof (cases "Y = trivial_topology")
  case True
  then show ?thesis
    by (simp add: continuous_map_on_empty)
next
  case False
  then show ?thesis
    by (simp add: continuous_compose_quotient_map_eq)
qed

lemma continuous_map_of_snd:
   "continuous_map (prod_topology X Y) Z (f ∘ snd) ⟷ X = trivial_topology ∨ continuous_map Y Z f"
proof (cases "X = trivial_topology")
  case True
  then show ?thesis
    by (simp add: continuous_map_on_empty)
next
  case False
  then show ?thesis
    by (simp add: continuous_compose_quotient_map_eq)
qed

lemma continuous_map_prod_top:
   "continuous_map (prod_topology X Y) (prod_topology X' Y') (λ(x,y). (f x, g y)) ⟷
    (prod_topology X Y) = trivial_topology ∨ continuous_map X X' f ∧ continuous_map Y Y' g"
proof (cases "(prod_topology X Y) = trivial_topology")
  case False
  then show ?thesis
    by (auto simp: continuous_map_paired case_prod_unfold 
               continuous_map_of_fst [unfolded o_def] continuous_map_of_snd [unfolded o_def])
qed auto

lemma in_prod_topology_closure_of:
  assumes  "z ∈ (prod_topology X Y) closure_of S"
  shows "fst z ∈ X closure_of (fst ` S)" "snd z ∈ Y closure_of (snd ` S)"
  using assms continuous_map_eq_image_closure_subset continuous_map_fst apply fastforce
  using assms continuous_map_eq_image_closure_subset continuous_map_snd apply fastforce
  done


proposition compact_space_prod_topology:
   "compact_space(prod_topology X Y) ⟷ (prod_topology X Y) = trivial_topology ∨ compact_space X ∧ compact_space Y"
proof (cases "(prod_topology X Y) = trivial_topology")
  case True
  then show ?thesis
    by fastforce
next
  case False
  then have non_mt: "topspace X ≠ {}" "topspace Y ≠ {}"
    by auto
  have "compact_space X" "compact_space Y" if "compact_space(prod_topology X Y)"
  proof -
    have "compactin X (fst ` (topspace X × topspace Y))"
      by (metis compact_space_def continuous_map_fst image_compactin that topspace_prod_topology)
    moreover
    have "compactin Y (snd ` (topspace X × topspace Y))"
      by (metis compact_space_def continuous_map_snd image_compactin that topspace_prod_topology)
    ultimately show "compact_space X" "compact_space Y"
      using non_mt by (auto simp: compact_space_def)
  qed
  moreover
  define 𝒳 where "𝒳 ≡ (λV. topspace X × V) ` Collect (openin Y)"
  define 𝒴 where "𝒴 ≡ (λU. U × topspace Y) ` Collect (openin X)"
  have "compact_space(prod_topology X Y)" if "compact_space X" "compact_space Y"
  proof (rule Alexander_subbase_alt)
    show toptop: "topspace X × topspace Y ⊆ ⋃(𝒳 ∪ 𝒴)"
      unfolding 𝒳_def 𝒴_def by auto
    fix 𝒞 :: "('a × 'b) set set"
    assume 𝒞: "𝒞 ⊆ 𝒳 ∪ 𝒴" "topspace X × topspace Y ⊆ ⋃𝒞"
    then obtain 𝒳' 𝒴' where XY: "𝒳' ⊆ 𝒳" "𝒴' ⊆ 𝒴" and 𝒞eq: "𝒞 = 𝒳' ∪ 𝒴'"
      using subset_UnE by metis
    then have sub: "topspace X × topspace Y ⊆ ⋃(𝒳' ∪ 𝒴')"
      using 𝒞 by simp
    obtain 𝒰 𝒱 where 𝒰: "⋀U. U ∈ 𝒰 ⟹ openin X U" "𝒴' = (λU. U × topspace Y) ` 𝒰"
      and 𝒱: "⋀V. V ∈ 𝒱 ⟹ openin Y V" "𝒳' = (λV. topspace X × V) ` 𝒱"
      using XY by (clarsimp simp add: 𝒳_def 𝒴_def subset_image_iff) (force simp: subset_iff)
    have "∃𝒟. finite 𝒟 ∧ 𝒟 ⊆ 𝒳' ∪ 𝒴' ∧ topspace X × topspace Y ⊆ ⋃ 𝒟"
    proof -
      have "topspace X ⊆ ⋃𝒰 ∨ topspace Y ⊆ ⋃𝒱"
        using 𝒰 𝒱 𝒞 𝒞eq by auto
      then have *: "∃𝒟. finite 𝒟 ∧
               (∀x ∈ 𝒟. x ∈ (λV. topspace X × V) ` 𝒱 ∨ x ∈ (λU. U × topspace Y) ` 𝒰) ∧
               (topspace X × topspace Y ⊆ ⋃𝒟)"
      proof
        assume "topspace X ⊆ ⋃𝒰"
        with ‹compact_space X› 𝒰 obtain ℱ where "finite ℱ" "ℱ ⊆ 𝒰" "topspace X ⊆ ⋃ℱ"
          by (meson compact_space_alt)
        with that show ?thesis
          by (rule_tac x="(λD. D × topspace Y) ` ℱ" in exI) auto
      next
        assume "topspace Y ⊆ ⋃𝒱"
        with ‹compact_space Y› 𝒱 obtain ℱ where "finite ℱ" "ℱ ⊆ 𝒱" "topspace Y ⊆ ⋃ℱ"
          by (meson compact_space_alt)
        with that show ?thesis
          by (rule_tac x="(λC. topspace X × C) ` ℱ" in exI) auto
      qed
      then show ?thesis
        using that 𝒰 𝒱 by blast
    qed
    then show "∃𝒟. finite 𝒟 ∧ 𝒟 ⊆ 𝒞 ∧ topspace X × topspace Y ⊆ ⋃ 𝒟"
      using 𝒞 𝒞eq by blast
  next
    have "(finite intersection_of (λx. x ∈ 𝒳 ∨ x ∈ 𝒴) relative_to topspace X × topspace Y)
           = (λU. ∃S T. U = S × T ∧ openin X S ∧ openin Y T)"
      (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
    proof -
      have "?rhs U" if "?lhs U" for U
      proof -
        have "topspace X × topspace Y ∩ ⋂ T ∈ {A × B |A B. A ∈ Collect (openin X) ∧ B ∈ Collect (openin Y)}"
          if "finite T" "T ⊆ 𝒳 ∪ 𝒴" for T
          using that
        proof induction
          case (insert B ℬ)
          then show ?case
            unfolding 𝒳_def 𝒴_def
            apply (simp add: Int_ac subset_eq image_def)
            apply (metis (no_types) openin_Int openin_topspace Times_Int_Times)
            done
        qed auto
        then show ?thesis
          using that
          by (auto simp: subset_eq  elim!: relative_toE intersection_ofE)
      qed
      moreover
      have "?lhs Z" if Z: "?rhs Z" for Z
      proof -
        obtain U V where "Z = U × V" "openin X U" "openin Y V"
          using Z by blast
        then have UV: "U × V = (topspace X × topspace Y) ∩ (U × V)"
          by (simp add: Sigma_mono inf_absorb2 openin_subset)
        moreover
        have "?lhs ((topspace X × topspace Y) ∩ (U × V))"
        proof (rule relative_to_inc)
          show "(finite intersection_of (λx. x ∈ 𝒳 ∨ x ∈ 𝒴)) (U × V)"
            apply (simp add: intersection_of_def 𝒳_def 𝒴_def)
            apply (rule_tac x="{(U × topspace Y),(topspace X × V)}" in exI)
            using ‹openin X U› ‹openin Y V› openin_subset UV apply (fastforce simp:)
            done
        qed
        ultimately show ?thesis
          using ‹Z = U × V› by auto
      qed
      ultimately show ?thesis
        by meson
    qed
    then show "topology (arbitrary union_of (finite intersection_of (λx. x ∈ 𝒳 ∪ 𝒴)
           relative_to (topspace X × topspace Y))) =
        prod_topology X Y"
      by (simp add: prod_topology_def)
  qed
  ultimately show ?thesis
    using False by blast
qed

lemma compactin_Times:
   "compactin (prod_topology X Y) (S × T) ⟷ S = {} ∨ T = {} ∨ compactin X S ∧ compactin Y T"
  by (auto simp: compactin_subspace subtopology_Times compact_space_prod_topology subtopology_trivial_iff)


subsection‹Homeomorphic maps›

lemma homeomorphic_maps_prod:
   "homeomorphic_maps (prod_topology X Y) (prod_topology X' Y') (λ(x,y). (f x, g y)) (λ(x,y). (f' x, g' y)) ⟷
        (prod_topology X Y) = trivial_topology ∧ (prod_topology X' Y') = trivial_topology 
      ∨ homeomorphic_maps X X' f f' ∧ homeomorphic_maps Y Y' g g'"  (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
  show "?lhs ⟹ ?rhs"
    by (fastforce simp: homeomorphic_maps_def continuous_map_prod_top ball_conj_distrib)
next
  show "?rhs ⟹ ?lhs"
  by (auto simp: homeomorphic_maps_def continuous_map_prod_top)
qed


lemma homeomorphic_maps_swap:
   "homeomorphic_maps (prod_topology X Y) (prod_topology Y X) (λ(x,y). (y,x)) (λ(y,x). (x,y))"
  by (auto simp: homeomorphic_maps_def case_prod_unfold continuous_map_fst continuous_map_pairedI continuous_map_snd)

lemma homeomorphic_map_swap:
   "homeomorphic_map (prod_topology X Y) (prod_topology Y X) (λ(x,y). (y,x))"
  using homeomorphic_map_maps homeomorphic_maps_swap by metis

lemma homeomorphic_space_prod_topology_swap:
   "(prod_topology X Y) homeomorphic_space (prod_topology Y X)"
  using homeomorphic_map_swap homeomorphic_space by blast

lemma embedding_map_graph:
   "embedding_map X (prod_topology X Y) (λx. (x, f x)) ⟷ continuous_map X Y f"
    (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
  assume L: ?lhs
  have "snd ∘ (λx. (x, f x)) = f"
    by force
  moreover have "continuous_map X Y (snd ∘ (λx. (x, f x)))"
    using L unfolding embedding_map_def
    by (meson continuous_map_in_subtopology continuous_map_snd_of homeomorphic_imp_continuous_map)
  ultimately show ?rhs
    by simp
next
  assume R: ?rhs
  then show ?lhs
    unfolding homeomorphic_map_maps embedding_map_def homeomorphic_maps_def
    by (rule_tac x=fst in exI)
       (auto simp: continuous_map_in_subtopology continuous_map_paired continuous_map_from_subtopology
                   continuous_map_fst)
qed

lemma homeomorphic_space_prod_topology:
   "⟦X homeomorphic_space X''; Y homeomorphic_space Y'⟧
        ⟹ prod_topology X Y homeomorphic_space prod_topology X'' Y'"
using homeomorphic_maps_prod unfolding homeomorphic_space_def by blast

lemma prod_topology_homeomorphic_space_left:
   "Y = discrete_topology {b} ⟹ prod_topology X Y homeomorphic_space X"
  unfolding homeomorphic_space_def
  apply (rule_tac x=fst in exI)
  apply (simp add: homeomorphic_map_def inj_on_def discrete_topology_unique flip: homeomorphic_map_maps)
  done

lemma prod_topology_homeomorphic_space_right:
   "X = discrete_topology {a} ⟹ prod_topology X Y homeomorphic_space Y"
  unfolding homeomorphic_space_def
  by (meson homeomorphic_space_def homeomorphic_space_prod_topology_swap homeomorphic_space_trans prod_topology_homeomorphic_space_left)


lemma homeomorphic_space_prod_topology_sing1:
     "b ∈ topspace Y ⟹ X homeomorphic_space (prod_topology X (subtopology Y {b}))"
  by (metis empty_subsetI homeomorphic_space_sym insert_subset prod_topology_homeomorphic_space_left subtopology_eq_discrete_topology_sing topspace_subtopology_subset)

lemma homeomorphic_space_prod_topology_sing2:
     "a ∈ topspace X ⟹ Y homeomorphic_space (prod_topology (subtopology X {a}) Y)"
  by (metis empty_subsetI homeomorphic_space_sym insert_subset prod_topology_homeomorphic_space_right subtopology_eq_discrete_topology_sing topspace_subtopology_subset)

lemma topological_property_of_prod_component:
  assumes major: "P(prod_topology X Y)"
    and X: "⋀x. ⟦x ∈ topspace X; P(prod_topology X Y)⟧ ⟹ P(subtopology (prod_topology X Y) ({x} × topspace Y))"
    and Y: "⋀y. ⟦y ∈ topspace Y; P(prod_topology X Y)⟧ ⟹ P(subtopology (prod_topology X Y) (topspace X × {y}))"
    and PQ:  "⋀X X'. X homeomorphic_space X' ⟹ (P X ⟷ Q X')"
    and PR: "⋀X X'. X homeomorphic_space X' ⟹ (P X ⟷ R X')"
  shows "(prod_topology X Y) = trivial_topology ∨ Q X ∧ R Y"
proof -
  have "Q X ∧ R Y" if "topspace(prod_topology X Y) ≠ {}"
  proof -
    from that obtain a b where a: "a ∈ topspace X" and b: "b ∈ topspace Y"
      by force
    show ?thesis
      using X [OF a major] and Y [OF b major] homeomorphic_space_prod_topology_sing1 [OF b, of X] homeomorphic_space_prod_topology_sing2 [OF a, of Y]
      by (simp add: subtopology_Times) (meson PQ PR homeomorphic_space_prod_topology_sing2 homeomorphic_space_sym)
  qed
  then show ?thesis by force
qed

lemma limitin_pairwise:
   "limitin (prod_topology X Y) f l F ⟷ limitin X (fst ∘ f) (fst l) F ∧ limitin Y (snd ∘ f) (snd l) F"
    (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
  assume ?lhs
  then obtain a b where ev: "⋀U. ⟦(a,b) ∈ U; openin (prod_topology X Y) U⟧ ⟹ ∀⇩F x in F. f x ∈ U"
                        and a: "a ∈ topspace X" and b: "b ∈ topspace Y" and l: "l = (a,b)"
    by (auto simp: limitin_def)
  moreover have "∀⇩F x in F. fst (f x) ∈ U" if "openin X U" "a ∈ U" for U
  proof -
    have "∀⇩F c in F. f c ∈ U × topspace Y"
      using b that ev [of "U × topspace Y"] by (auto simp: openin_prod_topology_alt)
    then show ?thesis
      by (rule eventually_mono) (metis (mono_tags, lifting) SigmaE2 prod.collapse)
  qed
  moreover have "∀⇩F x in F. snd (f x) ∈ U" if "openin Y U" "b ∈ U" for U
  proof -
    have "∀⇩F c in F. f c ∈ topspace X × U"
      using a that ev [of "topspace X × U"] by (auto simp: openin_prod_topology_alt)
    then show ?thesis
      by (rule eventually_mono) (metis (mono_tags, lifting) SigmaE2 prod.collapse)
  qed
  ultimately show ?rhs
    by (simp add: limitin_def)
next
  have "limitin (prod_topology X Y) f (a,b) F"
    if "limitin X (fst ∘ f) a F" "limitin Y (snd ∘ f) b F" for a b
    using that
  proof (clarsimp simp: limitin_def)
    fix Z :: "('a × 'b) set"
    assume a: "a ∈ topspace X" "∀U. openin X U ∧ a ∈ U ⟶ (∀⇩F x in F. fst (f x) ∈ U)"
      and b: "b ∈ topspace Y" "∀U. openin Y U ∧ b ∈ U ⟶ (∀⇩F x in F. snd (f x) ∈ U)"
      and Z: "openin (prod_topology X Y) Z" "(a, b) ∈ Z"
    then obtain U V where "openin X U" "openin Y V" "a ∈ U" "b ∈ V" "U × V ⊆ Z"
      using Z by (force simp: openin_prod_topology_alt)
    then have "∀⇩F x in F. fst (f x) ∈ U" "∀⇩F x in F. snd (f x) ∈ V"
      by (simp_all add: a b)
    then show "∀⇩F x in F. f x ∈ Z"
      by (rule eventually_elim2) (use ‹U × V ⊆ Z› subsetD in auto)
  qed
  then show "?rhs ⟹ ?lhs"
    by (metis prod.collapse)
qed

proposition connected_space_prod_topology:
   "connected_space(prod_topology X Y) ⟷
    (prod_topology X Y) = trivial_topology ∨ connected_space X ∧ connected_space Y" (is "?lhs=?rhs")
proof (cases "(prod_topology X Y) = trivial_topology")
  case True
  then show ?thesis
    by auto
next
  case False
  then have nonempty: "topspace X ≠ {}" "topspace Y ≠ {}"
    by force+
  show ?thesis 
  proof
    assume ?lhs
    then show ?rhs
      by (metis connected_space_quotient_map_image nonempty quotient_map_fst quotient_map_snd 
          subtopology_eq_discrete_topology_empty)
  next
    assume ?rhs
    then have conX: "connected_space X" and conY: "connected_space Y"
      using False by blast+
    have False
      if "openin (prod_topology X Y) U" and "openin (prod_topology X Y) V"
        and UV: "topspace X × topspace Y ⊆ U ∪ V" "U ∩ V = {}" 
        and "U ≠ {}" and "V ≠ {}"
      for U V
    proof -
      have Usub: "U ⊆ topspace X × topspace Y" and Vsub: "V ⊆ topspace X × topspace Y"
        using that by (metis openin_subset topspace_prod_topology)+
      obtain a b where ab: "(a,b) ∈ U" and a: "a ∈ topspace X" and b: "b ∈ topspace Y"
        using ‹U ≠ {}› Usub by auto
      have "¬ topspace X × topspace Y ⊆ U"
        using Usub Vsub ‹U ∩ V = {}› ‹V ≠ {}› by auto
      then obtain x y where x: "x ∈ topspace X" and y: "y ∈ topspace Y" and "(x,y) ∉ U"
        by blast
      have oX: "openin X {x ∈ topspace X. (x,y) ∈ U}" "openin X {x ∈ topspace X. (x,y) ∈ V}"
       and oY: "openin Y {y ∈ topspace Y. (a,y) ∈ U}" "openin Y {y ∈ topspace Y. (a,y) ∈ V}"
        by (force intro: openin_continuous_map_preimage [where Y = "prod_topology X Y"] 
            simp: that continuous_map_pairwise o_def x y a)+
      have 1: "topspace Y ⊆ {y ∈ topspace Y. (a,y) ∈ U} ∪ {y ∈ topspace Y. (a,y) ∈ V}"
        using a that(3) by auto
      have 2: "{y ∈ topspace Y. (a,y) ∈ U} ∩ {y ∈ topspace Y. (a,y) ∈ V} = {}"
        using that(4) by auto
      have 3: "{y ∈ topspace Y. (a,y) ∈ U} ≠ {}"
        using ab b by auto
      have 4: "{y ∈ topspace Y. (a,y) ∈ V} ≠ {}"
      proof -
        show ?thesis
          using connected_spaceD [OF conX oX] UV ‹(x,y) ∉ U› a x y
                disjoint_iff_not_equal by blast
      qed
      show ?thesis
        using connected_spaceD [OF conY oY 1 2 3 4] by auto
    qed
    then show ?lhs
      unfolding connected_space_def topspace_prod_topology by blast 
  qed
qed

lemma connectedin_Times:
   "connectedin (prod_topology X Y) (S × T) ⟷
        S = {} ∨ T = {} ∨ connectedin X S ∧ connectedin Y T"
  by (auto simp: connectedin_def subtopology_Times connected_space_prod_topology subtopology_trivial_iff)

end