Theory Function_Topology
theory Function_Topology
imports
Elementary_Topology
Abstract_Limits
Connected
begin
section ‹Function Topology›
text ‹We want to define the general product topology.
The product topology on a product of topological spaces is generated by
the sets which are products of open sets along finitely many coordinates, and the whole
space along the other coordinates. This is the coarsest topology for which the projection
to each factor is continuous.
To form a product of objects in Isabelle/HOL, all these objects should be subsets of a common type
'a. The product is then \<^term>‹Pi⇩E I X›, the set of elements from ‹'i› to ‹'a› such that the ‹i›-th
coordinate belongs to ‹X i› for all ‹i ∈ I›.
Hence, to form a product of topological spaces, all these spaces should be subsets of a common type.
This means that type classes can not be used to define such a product if one wants to take the
product of different topological spaces (as the type 'a can only be given one structure of
topological space using type classes). On the other hand, one can define different topologies (as
introduced in ‹thy›) on one type, and these topologies do not need to
share the same maximal open set. Hence, one can form a product of topologies in this sense, and
this works well. The big caveat is that it does not interact well with the main body of
topology in Isabelle/HOL defined in terms of type classes... For instance, continuity of maps
is not defined in this setting.
As the product of different topological spaces is very important in several areas of
mathematics (for instance adeles), I introduce below the product topology in terms of topologies,
and reformulate afterwards the consequences in terms of type classes (which are of course very
handy for applications).
Given this limitation, it looks to me that it would be very beneficial to revamp the theory
of topological spaces in Isabelle/HOL in terms of topologies, and keep the statements involving
type classes as consequences of more general statements in terms of topologies (but I am
probably too naive here).
Here is an example of a reformulation using topologies. Let
@{text [display]
‹continuous_map T1 T2 f =
((∀ U. openin T2 U ⟶ openin T1 (f-`U ∩ topspace(T1)))
∧ (f`(topspace T1) ⊆ (topspace T2)))›}
be the natural continuity definition of a map from the topology ‹T1› to the topology ‹T2›. Then
the current ‹continuous_on› (with type classes) can be redefined as
@{text [display] ‹continuous_on s f =
continuous_map (top_of_set s) (topology euclidean) f›}
In fact, I need ‹continuous_map› to express the continuity of the projection on subfactors
for the product topology, in Lemma~‹continuous_on_restrict_product_topology›, and I show
the above equivalence in Lemma~‹continuous_map_iff_continuous›.
I only develop the basics of the product topology in this theory. The most important missing piece
is Tychonov theorem, stating that a product of compact spaces is always compact for the product
topology, even when the product is not finite (or even countable).
I realized afterwards that this theory has a lot in common with 🗏‹~~/src/HOL/Library/Finite_Map.thy›.
›
subsection ‹The product topology›
text ‹We can now define the product topology, as generated by
the sets which are products of open sets along finitely many coordinates, and the whole
space along the other coordinates. Equivalently, it is generated by sets which are one open
set along one single coordinate, and the whole space along other coordinates. In fact, this is only
equivalent for nonempty products, but for the empty product the first formulation is better
(the second one gives an empty product space, while an empty product should have exactly one
point, equal to ‹undefined› along all coordinates.
So, we use the first formulation, which moreover seems to give rise to more straightforward proofs.
›
definition product_topology::"('i ⇒ ('a topology)) ⇒ ('i set) ⇒ (('i ⇒ 'a) topology)"
where "product_topology T I =
topology_generated_by {(Π⇩E i∈I. X i) |X. (∀i. openin (T i) (X i)) ∧ finite {i. X i ≠ topspace (T i)}}"
abbreviation powertop_real :: "'a set ⇒ ('a ⇒ real) topology"
where "powertop_real ≡ product_topology (λi. euclideanreal)"
text ‹The total set of the product topology is the product of the total sets
along each coordinate.›
proposition product_topology:
"product_topology X I =
topology
(arbitrary union_of
((finite intersection_of
(λF. ∃i U. F = {f. f i ∈ U} ∧ i ∈ I ∧ openin (X i) U))
relative_to (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i))))"
(is "_ = topology (_ union_of ((_ intersection_of ?Ψ) relative_to ?TOP))")
proof -
let ?Ω = "(λF. ∃Y. F = Pi⇩E I Y ∧ (∀i. openin (X i) (Y i)) ∧ finite {i. Y i ≠ topspace (X i)})"
have *: "(finite' intersection_of ?Ω) A = (finite intersection_of ?Ψ relative_to ?TOP) A" for A
proof -
have 1: "∃U. (∃𝒰. finite 𝒰 ∧ 𝒰 ⊆ Collect ?Ψ ∧ ⋂𝒰 = U) ∧ ?TOP ∩ U = ⋂𝒰"
if 𝒰: "𝒰 ⊆ Collect ?Ω" and "finite' 𝒰" "A = ⋂𝒰" "𝒰 ≠ {}" for 𝒰
proof -
have "∀U ∈ 𝒰. ∃Y. U = Pi⇩E I Y ∧ (∀i. openin (X i) (Y i)) ∧ finite {i. Y i ≠ topspace (X i)}"
using 𝒰 by auto
then obtain Y where Y: "⋀U. U ∈ 𝒰 ⟹ U = Pi⇩E I (Y U) ∧ (∀i. openin (X i) (Y U i)) ∧ finite {i. (Y U) i ≠ topspace (X i)}"
by metis
obtain U where "U ∈ 𝒰"
using ‹𝒰 ≠ {}› by blast
let ?F = "λU. (λi. {f. f i ∈ Y U i}) ` {i ∈ I. Y U i ≠ topspace (X i)}"
show ?thesis
proof (intro conjI exI)
show "finite (⋃U∈𝒰. ?F U)"
using Y ‹finite' 𝒰› by auto
show "?TOP ∩ ⋂(⋃U∈𝒰. ?F U) = ⋂𝒰"
proof
have *: "f ∈ U"
if "U ∈ 𝒰" and "∀V∈𝒰. ∀i. i ∈ I ∧ Y V i ≠ topspace (X i) ⟶ f i ∈ Y V i"
and "∀i∈I. f i ∈ topspace (X i)" and "f ∈ extensional I" for f U
by (smt (verit) PiE_iff Y that)
show "?TOP ∩ ⋂(⋃U∈𝒰. ?F U) ⊆ ⋂𝒰"
by (auto simp: PiE_iff *)
show "⋂𝒰 ⊆ ?TOP ∩ ⋂(⋃U∈𝒰. ?F U)"
using Y openin_subset ‹finite' 𝒰› by fastforce
qed
qed (use Y openin_subset in ‹blast+›)
qed
have 2: "∃𝒰'. finite' 𝒰' ∧ 𝒰' ⊆ Collect ?Ω ∧ ⋂𝒰' = ?TOP ∩ ⋂𝒰"
if 𝒰: "𝒰 ⊆ Collect ?Ψ" and "finite 𝒰" for 𝒰
proof (cases "𝒰={}")
case True
then show ?thesis
apply (rule_tac x="{?TOP}" in exI, simp)
apply (rule_tac x="λi. topspace (X i)" in exI)
apply force
done
next
case False
then obtain U where "U ∈ 𝒰"
by blast
have "∀U ∈ 𝒰. ∃i Y. U = {f. f i ∈ Y} ∧ i ∈ I ∧ openin (X i) Y"
using 𝒰 by auto
then obtain J Y where
Y: "⋀U. U ∈ 𝒰 ⟹ U = {f. f (J U) ∈ Y U} ∧ J U ∈ I ∧ openin (X (J U)) (Y U)"
by metis
let ?G = "λU. Π⇩E i∈I. if i = J U then Y U else topspace (X i)"
show ?thesis
proof (intro conjI exI)
show "finite (?G ` 𝒰)" "?G ` 𝒰 ≠ {}"
using ‹finite 𝒰› ‹U ∈ 𝒰› by blast+
have *: "⋀U. U ∈ 𝒰 ⟹ openin (X (J U)) (Y U)"
using Y by force
show "?G ` 𝒰 ⊆ {Pi⇩E I Y |Y. (∀i. openin (X i) (Y i)) ∧ finite {i. Y i ≠ topspace (X i)}}"
apply clarsimp
apply (rule_tac x= "(λi. if i = J U then Y U else topspace (X i))" in exI)
apply (auto simp: *)
done
next
show "(⋂U∈𝒰. ?G U) = ?TOP ∩ ⋂𝒰"
proof
have "(Π⇩E i∈I. if i = J U then Y U else topspace (X i)) ⊆ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i))"
by (simp add: PiE_mono Y ‹U ∈ 𝒰› openin_subset)
then have "(⋂U∈𝒰. ?G U) ⊆ ?TOP"
using ‹U ∈ 𝒰› by fastforce
moreover have "(⋂U∈𝒰. ?G U) ⊆ ⋂𝒰"
using PiE_mem Y by fastforce
ultimately show "(⋂U∈𝒰. ?G U) ⊆ ?TOP ∩ ⋂𝒰"
by auto
qed (use Y in fastforce)
qed
qed
show ?thesis
unfolding relative_to_def intersection_of_def
by (safe; blast dest!: 1 2)
qed
show ?thesis
unfolding product_topology_def generate_topology_on_eq
apply (rule arg_cong [where f = topology])
apply (rule arg_cong [where f = "(union_of)arbitrary"])
apply (force simp: *)
done
qed
lemma topspace_product_topology [simp]:
"topspace (product_topology T I) = (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace(T i))"
proof
show "topspace (product_topology T I) ⊆ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (T i))"
unfolding product_topology_def topology_generated_by_topspace
unfolding topspace_def by auto
have "(Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (T i)) ∈ {(Π⇩E i∈I. X i) |X. (∀i. openin (T i) (X i)) ∧ finite {i. X i ≠ topspace (T i)}}"
using openin_topspace not_finite_existsD by auto
then show "(Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (T i)) ⊆ topspace (product_topology T I)"
unfolding product_topology_def using PiE_def by (auto)
qed
lemma product_topology_trivial_iff:
"product_topology X I = trivial_topology ⟷ (∃i ∈ I. X i = trivial_topology)"
by (auto simp: PiE_eq_empty_iff simp flip: null_topspace_iff_trivial)
lemma topspace_product_topology_alt:
"topspace (product_topology X I) = {x ∈ extensional I. ∀i ∈ I. x i ∈ topspace(X i)}"
by (fastforce simp: PiE_iff)
lemma product_topology_basis:
assumes "⋀i. openin (T i) (X i)" "finite {i. X i ≠ topspace (T i)}"
shows "openin (product_topology T I) (Π⇩E i∈I. X i)"
unfolding product_topology_def
by (rule topology_generated_by_Basis) (use assms in auto)
proposition product_topology_open_contains_basis:
assumes "openin (product_topology T I) U" "x ∈ U"
shows "∃X. x ∈ (Π⇩E i∈I. X i) ∧ (∀i. openin (T i) (X i)) ∧ finite {i. X i ≠ topspace (T i)} ∧ (Π⇩E i∈I. X i) ⊆ U"
proof -
define IT where "IT ≡ λX. {i. X i ≠ topspace (T i)}"
have "generate_topology_on {(Π⇩E i∈I. X i) |X. (∀i. openin (T i) (X i)) ∧ finite (IT X)} U"
using assms unfolding product_topology_def IT_def by (intro openin_topology_generated_by) auto
then have "⋀x. x∈U ⟹ ∃X. x ∈ (Π⇩E i∈I. X i) ∧ (∀i. openin (T i) (X i)) ∧ finite (IT X) ∧ (Π⇩E i∈I. X i) ⊆ U"
proof induction
case (Int U V x)
then obtain XU XV where H:
"x ∈ Pi⇩E I XU" "⋀i. openin (T i) (XU i)" "finite (IT XU)" "Pi⇩E I XU ⊆ U"
"x ∈ Pi⇩E I XV" "⋀i. openin (T i) (XV i)" "finite (IT XV)" "Pi⇩E I XV ⊆ V"
by (meson Int_iff)
define X where "X = (λi. XU i ∩ XV i)"
have "Pi⇩E I X ⊆ Pi⇩E I XU ∩ Pi⇩E I XV"
by (auto simp add: PiE_iff X_def)
then have "Pi⇩E I X ⊆ U ∩ V" using H by auto
moreover have "∀i. openin (T i) (X i)"
unfolding X_def using H by auto
moreover have "finite (IT X)"
apply (rule rev_finite_subset[of "IT XU ∪ IT XV"])
using H by (auto simp: X_def IT_def)
moreover have "x ∈ Pi⇩E I X"
unfolding X_def using H by auto
ultimately show ?case
by auto
next
case (UN K x)
then obtain k where "k ∈ K" "x ∈ k" by auto
with ‹k ∈ K› UN show ?case
by (meson Sup_upper2)
qed auto
then show ?thesis using ‹x ∈ U› IT_def by blast
qed
lemma product_topology_empty_discrete:
"product_topology T {} = discrete_topology {(λx. undefined)}"
by (simp add: subtopology_eq_discrete_topology_sing)
lemma openin_product_topology:
"openin (product_topology X I) =
arbitrary union_of
((finite intersection_of (λF. (∃i U. F = {f. f i ∈ U} ∧ i ∈ I ∧ openin (X i) U)))
relative_to topspace (product_topology X I))"
by (simp add: istopology_subbase product_topology)
lemma subtopology_product_topology:
"subtopology (product_topology X I) (Π⇩E i∈I. (S i)) = product_topology (λi. subtopology (X i) (S i)) I"
proof -
let ?P = "λF. ∃i U. F = {f. f i ∈ U} ∧ i ∈ I ∧ openin (X i) U"
let ?X = "Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i)"
have "finite intersection_of ?P relative_to ?X ∩ Pi⇩E I S =
finite intersection_of (?P relative_to ?X ∩ Pi⇩E I S) relative_to ?X ∩ Pi⇩E I S"
by (rule finite_intersection_of_relative_to)
also have "… = finite intersection_of
((λF. ∃i U. F = {f. f i ∈ U} ∧ i ∈ I ∧ (openin (X i) relative_to S i) U)
relative_to ?X ∩ Pi⇩E I S)
relative_to ?X ∩ Pi⇩E I S"
apply (rule arg_cong2 [where f = "(relative_to)"])
apply (rule arg_cong [where f = "(intersection_of)finite"])
apply (rule ext)
apply (auto simp: relative_to_def intersection_of_def)
done
finally
have "finite intersection_of ?P relative_to ?X ∩ Pi⇩E I S =
finite intersection_of
(λF. ∃i U. F = {f. f i ∈ U} ∧ i ∈ I ∧ (openin (X i) relative_to S i) U)
relative_to ?X ∩ Pi⇩E I S"
by (metis finite_intersection_of_relative_to)
then show ?thesis
unfolding topology_eq
apply clarify
apply (simp add: openin_product_topology flip: openin_relative_to)
apply (simp add: arbitrary_union_of_relative_to flip: PiE_Int)
done
qed
lemma product_topology_base_alt:
"finite intersection_of (λF. (∃i U. F = {f. f i ∈ U} ∧ i ∈ I ∧ openin (X i) U))
relative_to (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i)) =
(λF. (∃U. F = Pi⇩E I U ∧ finite {i ∈ I. U i ≠ topspace(X i)} ∧ (∀i ∈ I. openin (X i) (U i))))"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof -
have "(∀F. ?lhs F ⟶ ?rhs F)"
unfolding all_relative_to all_intersection_of topspace_product_topology
proof clarify
fix ℱ
assume "finite ℱ" and "ℱ ⊆ {{f. f i ∈ U} |i U. i ∈ I ∧ openin (X i) U}"
then show "∃U. (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i)) ∩ ⋂ℱ = Pi⇩E I U ∧
finite {i ∈ I. U i ≠ topspace (X i)} ∧ (∀i∈I. openin (X i) (U i))"
proof (induction)
case (insert F ℱ)
then obtain U where eq: "(Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i)) ∩ ⋂ℱ = Pi⇩E I U"
and fin: "finite {i ∈ I. U i ≠ topspace (X i)}"
and ope: "⋀i. i ∈ I ⟹ openin (X i) (U i)"
by auto
obtain i V where "F = {f. f i ∈ V}" "i ∈ I" "openin (X i) V"
using insert by auto
let ?U = "λj. U j ∩ (if j = i then V else topspace(X j))"
show ?case
proof (intro exI conjI)
show "(Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i)) ∩ ⋂(insert F ℱ) = Pi⇩E I ?U"
using eq PiE_mem ‹i ∈ I› by (auto simp: ‹F = {f. f i ∈ V}›) fastforce
next
show "finite {i ∈ I. ?U i ≠ topspace (X i)}"
by (rule rev_finite_subset [OF finite.insertI [OF fin]]) auto
next
show "∀i∈I. openin (X i) (?U i)"
by (simp add: ‹openin (X i) V› ope openin_Int)
qed
qed (auto intro: dest: not_finite_existsD)
qed
moreover have "(∀F. ?rhs F ⟶ ?lhs F)"
proof clarify
fix U :: "'a ⇒ 'b set"
assume fin: "finite {i ∈ I. U i ≠ topspace (X i)}" and ope: "∀i∈I. openin (X i) (U i)"
let ?U = "⋂i∈{i ∈ I. U i ≠ topspace (X i)}. {x. x i ∈ U i}"
show "?lhs (Pi⇩E I U)"
unfolding relative_to_def topspace_product_topology
proof (intro exI conjI)
show "(finite intersection_of (λF. ∃i U. F = {f. f i ∈ U} ∧ i ∈ I ∧ openin (X i) U)) ?U"
using fin ope by (intro finite_intersection_of_Inter finite_intersection_of_inc) auto
show "(Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i)) ∩ ?U = Pi⇩E I U"
using ope openin_subset by fastforce
qed
qed
ultimately show ?thesis
by meson
qed
corollary openin_product_topology_alt:
"openin (product_topology X I) S ⟷
(∀x ∈ S. ∃U. finite {i ∈ I. U i ≠ topspace(X i)} ∧
(∀i ∈ I. openin (X i) (U i)) ∧ x ∈ Pi⇩E I U ∧ Pi⇩E I U ⊆ S)"
unfolding openin_product_topology arbitrary_union_of_alt product_topology_base_alt topspace_product_topology
by (smt (verit, best))
lemma closure_of_product_topology:
"(product_topology X I) closure_of (PiE I S) = PiE I (λi. (X i) closure_of (S i))"
proof -
have *: "(∀T. f ∈ T ∧ openin (product_topology X I) T ⟶ (∃y∈Pi⇩E I S. y ∈ T))
⟷ (∀i ∈ I. ∀T. f i ∈ T ∧ openin (X i) T ⟶ S i ∩ T ≠ {})"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
if top: "⋀i. i ∈ I ⟹ f i ∈ topspace (X i)" and ext: "f ∈ extensional I" for f
proof
assume L[rule_format]: ?lhs
show ?rhs
proof clarify
fix i T
assume "i ∈ I" "f i ∈ T" "openin (X i) T" "S i ∩ T = {}"
then have "openin (product_topology X I) ((Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i)) ∩ {x. x i ∈ T})"
by (force simp: openin_product_topology intro: arbitrary_union_of_inc relative_to_inc finite_intersection_of_inc)
then show "False"
using L [of "topspace (product_topology X I) ∩ {f. f i ∈ T}"] ‹S i ∩ T = {}› ‹f i ∈ T› ‹i ∈ I›
by (auto simp: top ext PiE_iff)
qed
next
assume R [rule_format]: ?rhs
show ?lhs
proof (clarsimp simp: openin_product_topology union_of_def arbitrary_def)
fix 𝒰 U
assume
𝒰: "𝒰 ⊆ Collect
(finite intersection_of (λF. ∃i U. F = {x. x i ∈ U} ∧ i ∈ I ∧ openin (X i) U) relative_to
(Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i)))" and
"f ∈ U" "U ∈ 𝒰"
then have "(finite intersection_of (λF. ∃i U. F = {x. x i ∈ U} ∧ i ∈ I ∧ openin (X i) U)
relative_to (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i))) U"
by blast
with ‹f ∈ U› ‹U ∈ 𝒰›
obtain 𝒯 where "finite 𝒯"
and 𝒯: "⋀C. C ∈ 𝒯 ⟹ ∃i ∈ I. ∃V. openin (X i) V ∧ C = {x. x i ∈ V}"
and "topspace (product_topology X I) ∩ ⋂ 𝒯 ⊆ U" "f ∈ topspace (product_topology X I) ∩ ⋂ 𝒯"
apply (clarsimp simp add: relative_to_def intersection_of_def)
apply (rule that, auto dest!: subsetD)
done
then have "f ∈ PiE I (topspace ∘ X)" "f ∈ ⋂𝒯" and subU: "PiE I (topspace ∘ X) ∩ ⋂𝒯 ⊆ U"
by (auto simp: PiE_iff)
have *: "f i ∈ topspace (X i) ∩ ⋂{U. openin (X i) U ∧ {x. x i ∈ U} ∈ 𝒯}
∧ openin (X i) (topspace (X i) ∩ ⋂{U. openin (X i) U ∧ {x. x i ∈ U} ∈ 𝒯})"
if "i ∈ I" for i
proof -
have "finite ((λU. {x. x i ∈ U}) -` 𝒯)"
proof (rule finite_vimageI [OF ‹finite 𝒯›])
show "inj (λU. {x. x i ∈ U})"
by (auto simp: inj_on_def)
qed
then have fin: "finite {U. openin (X i) U ∧ {x. x i ∈ U} ∈ 𝒯}"
by (rule rev_finite_subset) auto
have "openin (X i) (⋂ (insert (topspace (X i)) {U. openin (X i) U ∧ {x. x i ∈ U} ∈ 𝒯}))"
by (rule openin_Inter) (auto simp: fin)
then show ?thesis
using ‹f ∈ ⋂ 𝒯› by (fastforce simp: that top)
qed
define Φ where "Φ ≡ λi. topspace (X i) ∩ ⋂{U. openin (X i) U ∧ {f. f i ∈ U} ∈ 𝒯}"
have "∀i ∈ I. ∃x. x ∈ S i ∩ Φ i"
using R [OF _ *] unfolding Φ_def by blast
then obtain θ where θ [rule_format]: "∀i ∈ I. θ i ∈ S i ∩ Φ i"
by metis
show "∃y∈Pi⇩E I S. ∃x∈𝒰. y ∈ x"
proof
show "∃U ∈ 𝒰. (λi ∈ I. θ i) ∈ U"
proof
have "restrict θ I ∈ PiE I (topspace ∘ X) ∩ ⋂𝒯"
using 𝒯 by (fastforce simp: Φ_def PiE_def dest: θ)
then show "restrict θ I ∈ U"
using subU by blast
qed (rule ‹U ∈ 𝒰›)
next
show "(λi ∈ I. θ i) ∈ Pi⇩E I S"
using θ by simp
qed
qed
qed
show ?thesis
apply (simp add: * closure_of_def PiE_iff set_eq_iff cong: conj_cong)
by metis
qed
corollary closedin_product_topology:
"closedin (product_topology X I) (PiE I S) ⟷ PiE I S = {} ∨ (∀i ∈ I. closedin (X i) (S i))"
by (smt (verit, best) PiE_eq closedin_empty closure_of_eq closure_of_product_topology)
corollary closedin_product_topology_singleton:
"f ∈ extensional I ⟹ closedin (product_topology X I) {f} ⟷ (∀i ∈ I. closedin (X i) {f i})"
using PiE_singleton closedin_product_topology [of X I]
by (metis (no_types, lifting) all_not_in_conv insertI1)
lemma product_topology_empty:
"product_topology X {} = topology (λS. S ∈ {{},{λk. undefined}})"
unfolding product_topology union_of_def intersection_of_def arbitrary_def relative_to_def
by (auto intro: arg_cong [where f=topology])
lemma openin_product_topology_empty: "openin (product_topology X {}) S ⟷ S ∈ {{},{λk. undefined}}"
unfolding union_of_def intersection_of_def arbitrary_def relative_to_def openin_product_topology
by auto
subsubsection ‹The basic property of the product topology is the continuity of projections:›
lemma continuous_map_product_coordinates [simp]:
assumes "i ∈ I"
shows "continuous_map (product_topology T I) (T i) (λx. x i)"
proof -
{
fix U assume "openin (T i) U"
define X where "X = (λj. if j = i then U else topspace (T j))"
then have *: "(λx. x i) -` U ∩ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (T i)) = (Π⇩E j∈I. X j)"
unfolding X_def using assms openin_subset[OF ‹openin (T i) U›]
by (auto simp add: PiE_iff, auto, metis subsetCE)
have **: "(∀i. openin (T i) (X i)) ∧ finite {i. X i ≠ topspace (T i)}"
unfolding X_def using ‹openin (T i) U› by auto
have "openin (product_topology T I) ((λx. x i) -` U ∩ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (T i)))"
unfolding product_topology_def
apply (rule topology_generated_by_Basis)
apply (subst *)
using ** by auto
}
then show ?thesis unfolding continuous_map_alt
by (auto simp add: assms PiE_iff)
qed
lemma continuous_map_coordinatewise_then_product [intro]:
assumes "⋀i. i ∈ I ⟹ continuous_map T1 (T i) (λx. f x i)"
"⋀i x. i ∉ I ⟹ x ∈ topspace T1 ⟹ f x i = undefined"
shows "continuous_map T1 (product_topology T I) f"
unfolding product_topology_def
proof (rule continuous_on_generated_topo)
fix U assume "U ∈ {Pi⇩E I X |X. (∀i. openin (T i) (X i)) ∧ finite {i. X i ≠ topspace (T i)}}"
then obtain X where H: "U = Pi⇩E I X" "⋀i. openin (T i) (X i)" "finite {i. X i ≠ topspace (T i)}"
by blast
define J where "J = {i ∈ I. X i ≠ topspace (T i)}"
have "finite J" "J ⊆ I" unfolding J_def using H(3) by auto
have "(λx. f x i)-`(topspace(T i)) ∩ topspace T1 = topspace T1" if "i ∈ I" for i
using that assms(1) by (simp add: continuous_map_preimage_topspace)
then have *: "(λx. f x i)-`(X i) ∩ topspace T1 = topspace T1" if "i ∈ I-J" for i
using that unfolding J_def by auto
have "f-`U ∩ topspace T1 = (⋂i∈I. (λx. f x i)-`(X i) ∩ topspace T1) ∩ (topspace T1)"
by (subst H(1), auto simp add: PiE_iff assms)
also have "... = (⋂i∈J. (λx. f x i)-`(X i) ∩ topspace T1) ∩ (topspace T1)"
using * ‹J ⊆ I› by auto
also have "openin T1 (...)"
using H(2) ‹J ⊆ I› ‹finite J› assms(1) by blast
ultimately show "openin T1 (f-`U ∩ topspace T1)" by simp
next
have "f ∈ topspace T1 → topspace (product_topology T I)"
using assms continuous_map_funspace by (force simp: Pi_iff)
then show "f `topspace T1 ⊆ ⋃{Pi⇩E I X |X. (∀i. openin (T i) (X i)) ∧ finite {i. X i ≠ topspace (T i)}}"
by (fastforce simp add: product_topology_def Pi_iff)
qed
lemma continuous_map_product_then_coordinatewise [intro]:
assumes "continuous_map T1 (product_topology T I) f"
shows "⋀i. i ∈ I ⟹ continuous_map T1 (T i) (λx. f x i)"
"⋀i x. i ∉ I ⟹ x ∈ topspace T1 ⟹ f x i = undefined"
proof -
fix i assume "i ∈ I"
have "(λx. f x i) = (λy. y i) o f" by auto
also have "continuous_map T1 (T i) (...)"
by (metis ‹i ∈ I› assms continuous_map_compose continuous_map_product_coordinates)
ultimately show "continuous_map T1 (T i) (λx. f x i)"
by simp
next
fix i x assume "i ∉ I" "x ∈ topspace T1"
have "f x ∈ topspace (product_topology T I)"
using assms ‹x ∈ topspace T1› unfolding continuous_map_def by auto
then have "f x ∈ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (T i))"
using topspace_product_topology by metis
then show "f x i = undefined"
using ‹i ∉ I› by (auto simp add: PiE_iff extensional_def)
qed
lemma continuous_on_restrict:
assumes "J ⊆ I"
shows "continuous_map (product_topology T I) (product_topology T J) (λx. restrict x J)"
proof (rule continuous_map_coordinatewise_then_product)
fix i assume "i ∈ J"
then have "(λx. restrict x J i) = (λx. x i)" unfolding restrict_def by auto
then show "continuous_map (product_topology T I) (T i) (λx. restrict x J i)"
using ‹i ∈ J› ‹J ⊆ I› by auto
next
fix i assume "i ∉ J"
then show "restrict x J i = undefined" for x::"'a ⇒ 'b"
unfolding restrict_def by auto
qed
subsubsection ‹Powers of a single topological space as a topological space, using type classes›
instantiation "fun" :: (type, topological_space) topological_space
begin
definition open_fun_def:
"open U = openin (product_topology (λi. euclidean) UNIV) U"
instance proof
have "topspace (product_topology (λ(i::'a). euclidean::('b topology)) UNIV) = UNIV"
unfolding topspace_product_topology topspace_euclidean by auto
then show "open (UNIV::('a ⇒ 'b) set)"
unfolding open_fun_def by (metis openin_topspace)
qed (auto simp add: open_fun_def)
end
lemma open_PiE [intro?]:
fixes X::"'i ⇒ ('b::topological_space) set"
assumes "⋀i. open (X i)" "finite {i. X i ≠ UNIV}"
shows "open (Pi⇩E UNIV X)"
by (simp add: assms open_fun_def product_topology_basis)
lemma euclidean_product_topology:
"product_topology (λi. euclidean::('b::topological_space) topology) UNIV = euclidean"
by (metis open_openin topology_eq open_fun_def)
proposition product_topology_basis':
fixes x::"'i ⇒ 'a" and U::"'i ⇒ ('b::topological_space) set"
assumes "finite I" "⋀i. i ∈ I ⟹ open (U i)"
shows "open {f. ∀i∈I. f (x i) ∈ U i}"
proof -
define V where "V ≡ (λy. if y ∈ x`I then ⋂{U i|i. i∈I ∧ x i = y} else UNIV)"
define X where "X ≡ (λy. if y ∈ x`I then V y else UNIV)"
have *: "open (X i)" for i
unfolding X_def V_def using assms by auto
then have "open (Pi⇩E UNIV X)"
by (simp add: X_def assms(1) open_PiE)
moreover have "Pi⇩E UNIV X = {f. ∀i∈I. f (x i) ∈ U i}"
by (fastforce simp add: PiE_iff X_def V_def split: if_split_asm)
ultimately show ?thesis by simp
qed
text ‹The results proved in the general situation of products of possibly different
spaces have their counterparts in this simpler setting.›
lemma continuous_on_product_coordinates [simp]:
"continuous_on UNIV (λx. x i::('b::topological_space))"
using continuous_map_product_coordinates [of _ UNIV "λi. euclidean"]
by (metis (no_types) continuous_map_iff_continuous euclidean_product_topology iso_tuple_UNIV_I subtopology_UNIV)
lemma continuous_on_coordinatewise_then_product [continuous_intros]:
fixes f :: "'a::topological_space ⇒ 'b ⇒ 'c::topological_space"
assumes "⋀i. continuous_on S (λx. f x i)"
shows "continuous_on S f"
by (metis UNIV_I assms continuous_map_iff_continuous euclidean_product_topology
continuous_map_coordinatewise_then_product)
lemma continuous_on_product_then_coordinatewise:
assumes "continuous_on S f"
shows "continuous_on S (λx. f x i)"
by (metis UNIV_I assms continuous_map_iff_continuous continuous_map_product_then_coordinatewise(1) euclidean_product_topology)
lemma continuous_on_coordinatewise_iff:
fixes f :: "('a ⇒ real) ⇒ 'b ⇒ real"
shows "continuous_on (A ∩ S) f ⟷ (∀i. continuous_on (A ∩ S) (λx. f x i))"
by (auto simp: continuous_on_product_then_coordinatewise continuous_on_coordinatewise_then_product)
lemma continuous_map_span_sum:
fixes B :: "'a::real_normed_vector set"
assumes biB: "⋀i. i ∈ I ⟹ b i ∈ B"
shows "continuous_map euclidean (top_of_set (span B)) (λx. ∑i∈I. x i *⇩R b i)"
proof (rule continuous_map_euclidean_top_of_set)
show "(λx. ∑i∈I. x i *⇩R b i) -` span B = UNIV"
by auto (meson biB lessThan_iff span_base span_scale span_sum)
show "continuous_on UNIV (λx. ∑i∈ I. x i *⇩R b i)"
by (intro continuous_intros) auto
qed
subsubsection ‹Topological countability for product spaces›
text ‹The next two lemmas are useful to prove first or second countability
of product spaces, but they have more to do with countability and could
be put in the corresponding theory.›
lemma countable_nat_product_event_const:
fixes F::"'a set" and a::'a
assumes "a ∈ F" "countable F"
shows "countable {x::(nat ⇒ 'a). (∀i. x i ∈ F) ∧ finite {i. x i ≠ a}}"
proof -
have *: "{x::(nat ⇒ 'a). (∀i. x i ∈ F) ∧ finite {i. x i ≠ a}}
⊆ (⋃N. {x. (∀i. x i ∈ F) ∧ (∀i≥N. x i = a)})"
using infinite_nat_iff_unbounded_le by fastforce
have "countable {x. (∀i. x i ∈ F) ∧ (∀i≥N. x i = a)}" for N::nat
proof (induction N)
case 0
have "{x. (∀i. x i ∈ F) ∧ (∀i≥(0::nat). x i = a)} = {(λi. a)}"
using ‹a ∈ F› by auto
then show ?case by auto
next
case (Suc N)
define f::"((nat ⇒ 'a) × 'a) ⇒ (nat ⇒ 'a)"
where "f = (λ(x, b). x(N:=b))"
have "{x. (∀i. x i ∈ F) ∧ (∀i≥Suc N. x i = a)} ⊆ f`({x. (∀i. x i ∈ F) ∧ (∀i≥N. x i = a)} × F)"
proof (auto)
fix x assume H: "∀i::nat. x i ∈ F" "∀i≥Suc N. x i = a"
have "f (x(N:=a), x N) = x"
unfolding f_def by auto
moreover have "(x(N:=a), x N) ∈ {x. (∀i. x i ∈ F) ∧ (∀i≥N. x i = a)} × F"
using H ‹a ∈ F› by auto
ultimately show "x ∈ f ` ({x. (∀i. x i ∈ F) ∧ (∀i≥N. x i = a)} × F)"
by (metis (no_types, lifting) image_eqI)
qed
moreover have "countable ({x. (∀i. x i ∈ F) ∧ (∀i≥N. x i = a)} × F)"
using Suc.IH assms(2) by auto
ultimately show ?case
by (meson countable_image countable_subset)
qed
then show ?thesis using countable_subset[OF *] by auto
qed
lemma countable_product_event_const:
fixes F::"('a::countable) ⇒ 'b set" and b::'b
assumes "⋀i. countable (F i)"
shows "countable {f::('a ⇒ 'b). (∀i. f i ∈ F i) ∧ (finite {i. f i ≠ b})}"
proof -
define G where "G = (⋃i. F i) ∪ {b}"
have "countable G" unfolding G_def using assms by auto
have "b ∈ G" unfolding G_def by auto
define pi where "pi = (λ(x::(nat ⇒ 'b)). (λ i::'a. x ((to_nat::('a ⇒ nat)) i)))"
have "{f::('a ⇒ 'b). (∀i. f i ∈ F i) ∧ (finite {i. f i ≠ b})}
⊆ pi`{g::(nat ⇒ 'b). (∀j. g j ∈ G) ∧ (finite {j. g j ≠ b})}"
proof (auto)
fix f assume H: "∀i. f i ∈ F i" "finite {i. f i ≠ b}"
define I where "I = {i. f i ≠ b}"
define g where "g = (λj. if j ∈ to_nat`I then f (from_nat j) else b)"
have "{j. g j ≠ b} ⊆ to_nat`I" unfolding g_def by auto
then have "finite {j. g j ≠ b}"
unfolding I_def using H(2) using finite_surj by blast
moreover have "g j ∈ G" for j
unfolding g_def G_def using H by auto
ultimately have "g ∈ {g::(nat ⇒ 'b). (∀j. g j ∈ G) ∧ (finite {j. g j ≠ b})}"
by auto
moreover have "f = pi g"
unfolding pi_def g_def I_def using H by fastforce
ultimately show "f ∈ pi`{g. (∀j. g j ∈ G) ∧ finite {j. g j ≠ b}}"
by auto
qed
then show ?thesis
using countable_nat_product_event_const[OF ‹b ∈ G› ‹countable G›]
by (meson countable_image countable_subset)
qed
instance "fun" :: (countable, first_countable_topology) first_countable_topology
proof
fix x::"'a ⇒ 'b"
have "∃A::('b ⇒ nat ⇒ 'b set). ∀x. (∀i. x ∈ A x i ∧ open (A x i)) ∧ (∀S. open S ∧ x ∈ S ⟶ (∃i. A x i ⊆ S))"
apply (rule choice) using first_countable_basis by auto
then obtain A::"('b ⇒ nat ⇒ 'b set)" where A: "⋀x i. x ∈ A x i"
"⋀x i. open (A x i)"
"⋀x S. open S ⟹ x ∈ S ⟹ (∃i. A x i ⊆ S)"
by metis
text ‹‹B i› is a countable basis of neighborhoods of ‹x⇩i›.›
define B where "B = (λi. (A (x i))`UNIV ∪ {UNIV})"
have countB: "countable (B i)" for i unfolding B_def by auto
have open_B: "⋀X i. X ∈ B i ⟹ open X"
by (auto simp: B_def A)
define K where "K = {Pi⇩E UNIV X | X. (∀i. X i ∈ B i) ∧ finite {i. X i ≠ UNIV}}"
have "Pi⇩E UNIV (λi. UNIV) ∈ K"
unfolding K_def B_def by auto
then have "K ≠ {}" by auto
have "countable {X. (∀i. X i ∈ B i) ∧ finite {i. X i ≠ UNIV}}"
by (simp add: countB countable_product_event_const)
moreover have "K = (λX. Pi⇩E UNIV X)`{X. (∀i. X i ∈ B i) ∧ finite {i. X i ≠ UNIV}}"
unfolding K_def by auto
ultimately have "countable K" by auto
have I: "x ∈ k" if "k ∈ K" for k
using that unfolding K_def B_def apply auto using A(1) by auto
have II: "open k" if "k ∈ K" for k
using that unfolding K_def by (blast intro: open_B open_PiE)
have Inc: "∃k∈K. k ⊆ U" if "open U ∧ x ∈ U" for U
proof -
have "openin (product_topology (λi. euclidean) UNIV) U" "x ∈ U"
using ‹open U ∧ x ∈ U› unfolding open_fun_def by auto
with product_topology_open_contains_basis[OF this]
have "∃X. x ∈ (Π⇩E i∈UNIV. X i) ∧ (∀i. open (X i)) ∧ finite {i. X i ≠ UNIV} ∧ (Π⇩E i∈UNIV. X i) ⊆ U"
by simp
then obtain X where H: "x ∈ (Π⇩E i∈UNIV. X i)"
"⋀i. open (X i)"
"finite {i. X i ≠ UNIV}"
"(Π⇩E i∈UNIV. X i) ⊆ U"
by auto
define I where "I = {i. X i ≠ UNIV}"
define Y where "Y = (λi. if i ∈ I then (SOME y. y ∈ B i ∧ y ⊆ X i) else UNIV)"
have *: "∃y. y ∈ B i ∧ y ⊆ X i" for i
unfolding B_def using A(3)[OF H(2)] H(1) by (metis PiE_E UNIV_I UnCI image_iff)
have **: "Y i ∈ B i ∧ Y i ⊆ X i" for i
proof (cases "i ∈ I")
case True
then show ?thesis
by (metis (mono_tags, lifting) "*" Nitpick.Eps_psimp Y_def)
next
case False
then show ?thesis by (simp add: B_def I_def Y_def)
qed
have "{i. Y i ≠ UNIV} ⊆ I"
unfolding Y_def by auto
with ** have "(∀i. Y i ∈ B i) ∧ finite {i. Y i ≠ UNIV}"
using H(3) I_def finite_subset by blast
then have "Pi⇩E UNIV Y ∈ K"
unfolding K_def by auto
have "Y i ⊆ X i" for i
using "**" by auto
then have "Pi⇩E UNIV Y ⊆ U"
by (metis H(4) PiE_mono subset_trans)
then show ?thesis using ‹Pi⇩E UNIV Y ∈ K› by auto
qed
show "∃L. (∀(i::nat). x ∈ L i ∧ open (L i)) ∧ (∀U. open U ∧ x ∈ U ⟶ (∃i. L i ⊆ U))"
using ‹countable K› I II Inc by (simp add: first_countableI)
qed
proposition product_topology_countable_basis:
shows "∃K::(('a::countable ⇒ 'b::second_countable_topology) set set).
topological_basis K ∧ countable K ∧
(∀k∈K. ∃X. (k = Pi⇩E UNIV X) ∧ (∀i. open (X i)) ∧ finite {i. X i ≠ UNIV})"
proof -
obtain B::"'b set set" where B: "countable B ∧ topological_basis B"
using ex_countable_basis by auto
then have "B ≠ {}" by (meson UNIV_I empty_iff open_UNIV topological_basisE)
define B2 where "B2 = B ∪ {UNIV}"
have "countable B2"
unfolding B2_def using B by auto
have "open U" if "U ∈ B2" for U
using that unfolding B2_def using B topological_basis_open by auto
define K where "K = {Pi⇩E UNIV X | X. (∀i::'a. X i ∈ B2) ∧ finite {i. X i ≠ UNIV}}"
have i: "∀k∈K. ∃X. (k = Pi⇩E UNIV X) ∧ (∀i. open (X i)) ∧ finite {i. X i ≠ UNIV}"
unfolding K_def using ‹⋀U. U ∈ B2 ⟹ open U› by auto
have "countable {X. (∀(i::'a). X i ∈ B2) ∧ finite {i. X i ≠ UNIV}}"
using ‹countable B2› by (intro countable_product_event_const) auto
moreover have "K = (λX. Pi⇩E UNIV X)`{X. (∀i. X i ∈ B2) ∧ finite {i. X i ≠ UNIV}}"
unfolding K_def by auto
ultimately have ii: "countable K" by auto
have iii: "topological_basis K"
proof (rule topological_basisI)
fix U and x::"'a⇒'b" assume "open U" "x ∈ U"
then have "openin (product_topology (λi. euclidean) UNIV) U"
unfolding open_fun_def by auto
with product_topology_open_contains_basis[OF this ‹x ∈ U›]
obtain X where H: "x ∈ (Π⇩E i∈UNIV. X i)"
"⋀i. open (X i)"
"finite {i. X i ≠ UNIV}"
"(Π⇩E i∈UNIV. X i) ⊆ U"
by auto
then have "x i ∈ X i" for i by auto
define I where "I = {i. X i ≠ UNIV}"
define Y where "Y = (λi. if i ∈ I then (SOME y. y ∈ B2 ∧ y ⊆ X i ∧ x i ∈ y) else UNIV)"
have *: "∃y. y ∈ B2 ∧ y ⊆ X i ∧ x i ∈ y" for i
unfolding B2_def using B ‹open (X i)› ‹x i ∈ X i› by (meson UnCI topological_basisE)
have **: "Y i ∈ B2 ∧ Y i ⊆ X i ∧ x i ∈ Y i" for i
using someI_ex[OF *] by (simp add: B2_def I_def Y_def)
have "{i. Y i ≠ UNIV} ⊆ I"
unfolding Y_def by auto
then have "(∀i. Y i ∈ B2) ∧ finite {i. Y i ≠ UNIV}"
using "**" H(3) I_def finite_subset by blast
then have "Pi⇩E UNIV Y ∈ K"
unfolding K_def by auto
then show "∃V∈K. x ∈ V ∧ V ⊆ U"
by (meson "**" H(4) PiE_I PiE_mono UNIV_I order.trans)
next
fix U assume "U ∈ K"
show "open U"
using ‹U ∈ K› unfolding open_fun_def K_def by clarify (metis ‹U ∈ K› i open_PiE open_fun_def)
qed
show ?thesis using i ii iii by auto
qed
instance "fun" :: (countable, second_countable_topology) second_countable_topology
proof
show "∃B::('a ⇒ 'b) set set. countable B ∧ open = generate_topology B"
using product_topology_countable_basis topological_basis_imp_subbasis
by auto
qed
subsection‹The Alexander subbase theorem›
theorem Alexander_subbase:
assumes X: "topology (arbitrary union_of (finite intersection_of (λx. x ∈ ℬ) relative_to ⋃ℬ)) = X"
and fin: "⋀C. ⟦C ⊆ ℬ; ⋃C = topspace X⟧ ⟹ ∃C'. finite C' ∧ C' ⊆ C ∧ ⋃C' = topspace X"
shows "compact_space X"
proof -
have Uℬ: "⋃ℬ = topspace X"
by (simp flip: X)
have False if 𝒰: "∀U∈𝒰. openin X U" and sub: "topspace X ⊆ ⋃𝒰"
and neg: "⋀ℱ. ⟦ℱ ⊆ 𝒰; finite ℱ⟧ ⟹ ¬ topspace X ⊆ ⋃ℱ" for 𝒰
proof -
define 𝒜 where "𝒜 ≡ {𝒞. (∀U ∈ 𝒞. openin X U) ∧ topspace X ⊆ ⋃𝒞 ∧ (∀ℱ. finite ℱ ⟶ ℱ ⊆ 𝒞 ⟶ ~(topspace X ⊆ ⋃ℱ))}"
have 1: "𝒜 ≠ {}"
unfolding 𝒜_def using sub 𝒰 neg by force
have 2: "⋃𝒞 ∈ 𝒜" if "𝒞≠{}" and 𝒞: "subset.chain 𝒜 𝒞" for 𝒞
unfolding 𝒜_def
proof (intro CollectI conjI ballI allI impI notI)
show "openin X U" if U: "U ∈ ⋃𝒞" for U
using U 𝒞 unfolding 𝒜_def subset_chain_def by force
have "𝒞 ⊆ 𝒜"
using subset_chain_def 𝒞 by blast
with that 𝒜_def show UUC: "topspace X ⊆ ⋃(⋃𝒞)"
by blast
show "False" if "finite ℱ" and "ℱ ⊆ ⋃𝒞" and "topspace X ⊆ ⋃ℱ" for ℱ
proof -
obtain ℬ where "ℬ ∈ 𝒞" "ℱ ⊆ ℬ"
by (metis Sup_empty 𝒞 ‹ℱ ⊆ ⋃𝒞› ‹finite ℱ› UUC empty_subsetI finite.emptyI finite_subset_Union_chain neg)
then show False
using 𝒜_def ‹𝒞 ⊆ 𝒜› ‹finite ℱ› ‹topspace X ⊆ ⋃ℱ› by blast
qed
qed
obtain 𝒦 where "𝒦 ∈ 𝒜" and "⋀X. ⟦X∈𝒜; 𝒦 ⊆ X⟧ ⟹ X = 𝒦"
using subset_Zorn_nonempty [OF 1 2] by metis
then have *: "⋀𝒲. ⟦⋀W. W∈𝒲 ⟹ openin X W; topspace X ⊆ ⋃𝒲; 𝒦 ⊆ 𝒲;
⋀ℱ. ⟦finite ℱ; ℱ ⊆ 𝒲; topspace X ⊆ ⋃ℱ⟧ ⟹ False⟧
⟹ 𝒲 = 𝒦"
and ope: "∀U∈𝒦. openin X U" and top: "topspace X ⊆ ⋃𝒦"
and non: "⋀ℱ. ⟦finite ℱ; ℱ ⊆ 𝒦; topspace X ⊆ ⋃ℱ⟧ ⟹ False"
unfolding 𝒜_def by simp_all metis+
then obtain x where "x ∈ topspace X" "x ∉ ⋃(ℬ ∩ 𝒦)"
proof -
have "⋃(ℬ ∩ 𝒦) ≠ ⋃ℬ"
by (metis ‹⋃ℬ = topspace X› fin inf.bounded_iff non order_refl)
then have "∃a. a ∉ ⋃(ℬ ∩ 𝒦) ∧ a ∈ ⋃ℬ"
by blast
then show ?thesis
using that by (metis Uℬ)
qed
obtain C where C: "openin X C" "C ∈ 𝒦" "x ∈ C"
using ‹x ∈ topspace X› ope top by auto
then have "C ⊆ topspace X"
by (metis openin_subset)
then have "(arbitrary union_of (finite intersection_of (λx. x ∈ ℬ) relative_to ⋃ℬ)) C"
using openin_subbase C unfolding X [symmetric] by blast
moreover have "C ≠ topspace X"
using ‹𝒦 ∈ 𝒜› ‹C ∈ 𝒦› unfolding 𝒜_def by blast
ultimately obtain 𝒱 W where W: "(finite intersection_of (λx. x ∈ ℬ) relative_to topspace X) W"
and "x ∈ W" "W ∈ 𝒱" "⋃𝒱 ≠ topspace X" "C = ⋃𝒱"
using C by (auto simp: union_of_def Uℬ)
then have "⋃𝒱 ⊆ topspace X"
by (metis ‹C ⊆ topspace X›)
then have "topspace X ∉ 𝒱"
using ‹⋃𝒱 ≠ topspace X› by blast
then obtain ℬ' where ℬ': "finite ℬ'" "ℬ' ⊆ ℬ" "x ∈ ⋂ℬ'" "W = topspace X ∩ ⋂ℬ'"
using W ‹x ∈ W› unfolding relative_to_def intersection_of_def by auto
then have "⋂ℬ' ⊆ ⋃ℬ"
using ‹W ∈ 𝒱› ‹⋃𝒱 ≠ topspace X› ‹⋃𝒱 ⊆ topspace X› by blast
then have "⋂ℬ' ⊆ C"
using Uℬ ‹C = ⋃𝒱› ‹W = topspace X ∩ ⋂ℬ'› ‹W ∈ 𝒱› by auto
have "∀b ∈ ℬ'. ∃C'. finite C' ∧ C' ⊆ 𝒦 ∧ topspace X ⊆ ⋃(insert b C')"
proof
fix b
assume "b ∈ ℬ'"
have "insert b 𝒦 = 𝒦" if neg: "¬ (∃C'. finite C' ∧ C' ⊆ 𝒦 ∧ topspace X ⊆ ⋃(insert b C'))"
proof (rule *)
show "openin X W" if "W ∈ insert b 𝒦" for W
using that
proof
have "b ∈ ℬ"
using ‹b ∈ ℬ'› ‹ℬ' ⊆ ℬ› by blast
then have "∃𝒰. finite 𝒰 ∧ 𝒰 ⊆ ℬ ∧ ⋂𝒰 = b"
by (rule_tac x="{b}" in exI) auto
moreover have "⋃ℬ ∩ b = b"
using ℬ'(2) ‹b ∈ ℬ'› by auto
ultimately show "openin X W" if "W = b"
using that ‹b ∈ ℬ'›
apply (simp add: openin_subbase flip: X)
apply (auto simp: arbitrary_def intersection_of_def relative_to_def intro!: union_of_inc)
done
show "openin X W" if "W ∈ 𝒦"
by (simp add: ‹W ∈ 𝒦› ope)
qed
next
show "topspace X ⊆ ⋃ (insert b 𝒦)"
using top by auto
next
show False if "finite ℱ" and "ℱ ⊆ insert b 𝒦" "topspace X ⊆ ⋃ℱ" for ℱ
proof -
have "insert b (ℱ ∩ 𝒦) = ℱ"
using non that by blast
then show False
by (metis Int_lower2 finite_insert neg that(1) that(3))
qed
qed auto
then show "∃C'. finite C' ∧ C' ⊆ 𝒦 ∧ topspace X ⊆ ⋃(insert b C')"
using ‹b ∈ ℬ'› ‹x ∉ ⋃(ℬ ∩ 𝒦)› ℬ'
by (metis IntI InterE Union_iff subsetD insertI1)
qed
then obtain F where F: "∀b ∈ ℬ'. finite (F b) ∧ F b ⊆ 𝒦 ∧ topspace X ⊆ ⋃(insert b (F b))"
by metis
let ?𝒟 = "insert C (⋃(F ` ℬ'))"
show False
proof (rule non)
have "topspace X ⊆ (⋂b ∈ ℬ'. ⋃(insert b (F b)))"
using F by (simp add: INT_greatest)
also have "… ⊆ ⋃?𝒟"
using ‹⋂ℬ' ⊆ C› by force
finally show "topspace X ⊆ ⋃?𝒟" .
show "?𝒟 ⊆ 𝒦"
using ‹C ∈ 𝒦› F by auto
show "finite ?𝒟"
using ‹finite ℬ'› F by auto
qed
qed
then show ?thesis
by (force simp: compact_space_def compactin_def)
qed
corollary Alexander_subbase_alt:
assumes "U ⊆ ⋃ℬ"
and fin: "⋀C. ⟦C ⊆ ℬ; U ⊆ ⋃C⟧ ⟹ ∃C'. finite C' ∧ C' ⊆ C ∧ U ⊆ ⋃C'"
and X: "topology
(arbitrary union_of
(finite intersection_of (λx. x ∈ ℬ) relative_to U)) = X"
shows "compact_space X"
proof -
have "topspace X = U"
using X topspace_subbase by fastforce
have eq: "⋃ (Collect ((λx. x ∈ ℬ) relative_to U)) = U"
unfolding relative_to_def
using ‹U ⊆ ⋃ℬ› by blast
have *: "∃ℱ. finite ℱ ∧ ℱ ⊆ 𝒞 ∧ ⋃ℱ = topspace X"
if "𝒞 ⊆ Collect ((λx. x ∈ ℬ) relative_to topspace X)" and UC: "⋃𝒞 = topspace X" for 𝒞
proof -
have "𝒞 ⊆ (λU. topspace X ∩ U) ` ℬ"
using that by (auto simp: relative_to_def)
then obtain ℬ' where "ℬ' ⊆ ℬ" and ℬ': "𝒞 = (∩) (topspace X) ` ℬ'"
by (auto simp: subset_image_iff)
moreover have "U ⊆ ⋃ℬ'"
using ℬ' ‹topspace X = U› UC by auto
ultimately obtain 𝒞' where "finite 𝒞'" "𝒞' ⊆ ℬ'" "U ⊆ ⋃𝒞'"
using fin [of ℬ'] ‹topspace X = U› ‹U ⊆ ⋃ℬ› by blast
then show ?thesis
unfolding ℬ' ex_finite_subset_image ‹topspace X = U› by auto
qed
show ?thesis
apply (rule Alexander_subbase [where ℬ = "Collect ((λx. x ∈ ℬ) relative_to (topspace X))"])
apply (simp flip: X)
apply (metis finite_intersection_of_relative_to eq)
apply (blast intro: *)
done
qed
proposition continuous_map_componentwise:
"continuous_map X (product_topology Y I) f ⟷
f ` (topspace X) ⊆ extensional I ∧ (∀k ∈ I. continuous_map X (Y k) (λx. f x k))"
(is "?lhs ⟷ _ ∧ ?rhs")
proof (cases "∀x ∈ topspace X. f x ∈ extensional I")
case True
then have "f ` (topspace X) ⊆ extensional I"
by force
moreover have ?rhs if L: ?lhs
proof -
have "openin X {x ∈ topspace X. f x k ∈ U}" if "k ∈ I" and "openin (Y k) U" for k U
proof -
have "openin (product_topology Y I) ({Y. Y k ∈ U} ∩ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (Y i)))"
apply (simp add: openin_product_topology flip: arbitrary_union_of_relative_to)
apply (simp add: relative_to_def)
using that apply (blast intro: arbitrary_union_of_inc finite_intersection_of_inc)
done
with that have "openin X {x ∈ topspace X. f x ∈ ({Y. Y k ∈ U} ∩ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (Y i)))}"
using L unfolding continuous_map_def by blast
moreover have "{x ∈ topspace X. f x ∈ ({Y. Y k ∈ U} ∩ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (Y i)))} = {x ∈ topspace X. f x k ∈ U}"
using L by (auto simp: continuous_map_def)
ultimately show ?thesis
by metis
qed
with that
show ?thesis
by (auto simp: continuous_map_def)
qed
moreover have ?lhs if ?rhs
proof -
have 1: "⋀x. x ∈ topspace X ⟹ f x ∈ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (Y i))"
using that True by (auto simp: continuous_map_def PiE_iff)
have 2: "{x ∈ S. ∃T∈𝒯. f x ∈ T} = (⋃T∈𝒯. {x ∈ S. f x ∈ T})" for S 𝒯
by blast
have 3: "{x ∈ S. ∀U∈𝒰. f x ∈ U} = (⋂ (insert S ((λU. {x ∈ S. f x ∈ U}) ` 𝒰)))" for S 𝒰
by blast
show ?thesis
unfolding continuous_map_def openin_product_topology arbitrary_def
proof (clarsimp simp: all_union_of 1 2)
fix 𝒯
assume 𝒯: "𝒯 ⊆ Collect (finite intersection_of (λF. ∃i U. F = {f. f i ∈ U} ∧ i ∈ I ∧ openin (Y i) U)
relative_to (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (Y i)))"
show "openin X (⋃T∈𝒯. {x ∈ topspace X. f x ∈ T})"
proof (rule openin_Union; clarify)
fix S T
assume "T ∈ 𝒯"
obtain 𝒰 where "T = (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (Y i)) ∩ ⋂𝒰" and "finite 𝒰"
"𝒰 ⊆ {{f. f i ∈ U} |i U. i ∈ I ∧ openin (Y i) U}"
using subsetD [OF 𝒯 ‹T ∈ 𝒯›] by (auto simp: intersection_of_def relative_to_def)
with that show "openin X {x ∈ topspace X. f x ∈ T}"
apply (simp add: continuous_map_def 1 cong: conj_cong)
unfolding 3
apply (rule openin_Inter; auto)
done
qed
qed
qed
ultimately show ?thesis
by metis
qed (auto simp: continuous_map_def PiE_def)
lemma continuous_map_componentwise_UNIV:
"continuous_map X (product_topology Y UNIV) f ⟷ (∀k. continuous_map X (Y k) (λx. f x k))"
by (simp add: continuous_map_componentwise)
lemma continuous_map_product_projection [continuous_intros]:
"k ∈ I ⟹ continuous_map (product_topology X I) (X k) (λx. x k)"
using continuous_map_componentwise [of "product_topology X I" X I id] by simp
declare continuous_map_from_subtopology [OF continuous_map_product_projection, continuous_intros]
proposition open_map_product_projection:
assumes "i ∈ I"
shows "open_map (product_topology Y I) (Y i) (λf. f i)"
unfolding openin_product_topology all_union_of arbitrary_def open_map_def image_Union
proof clarify
fix 𝒱
assume 𝒱: "𝒱 ⊆ Collect
(finite intersection_of
(λF. ∃i U. F = {f. f i ∈ U} ∧ i ∈ I ∧ openin (Y i) U) relative_to
topspace (product_topology Y I))"
show "openin (Y i) (⋃x∈𝒱. (λf. f i) ` x)"
proof (rule openin_Union, clarify)
fix S V
assume "V ∈ 𝒱"
obtain ℱ where "finite ℱ"
and V: "V = (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (Y i)) ∩ ⋂ℱ"
and ℱ: "ℱ ⊆ {{f. f i ∈ U} |i U. i ∈ I ∧ openin (Y i) U}"
using subsetD [OF 𝒱 ‹V ∈ 𝒱›]
by (auto simp: intersection_of_def relative_to_def)
show "openin (Y i) ((λf. f i) ` V)"
proof (subst openin_subopen; clarify)
fix x f
assume "f ∈ V"
let ?T = "{a ∈ topspace(Y i).
(λj∈I. f j)(i:=a) ∈ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (Y i)) ∩ ⋂ℱ}"
show "∃T. openin (Y i) T ∧ f i ∈ T ∧ T ⊆ (λf. f i) ` V"
proof (intro exI conjI)
show "openin (Y i) ?T"
proof (rule openin_continuous_map_preimage)
have "continuous_map (Y i) (Y k) (λx. if k = i then x else f k)" if "k ∈ I" for k
proof (cases "k=i")
case True
then show ?thesis
by (metis (mono_tags) continuous_map_id eq_id_iff)
next
case False
then show ?thesis
by simp (metis IntD1 PiE_iff V ‹f ∈ V› that)
qed
then show "continuous_map (Y i) (product_topology Y I)
(λx. (λj∈I. f j)(i:=x))"
by (auto simp: continuous_map_componentwise assms extensional_def restrict_def)
next
have "openin (product_topology Y I) (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (Y i))"
by (metis openin_topspace topspace_product_topology)
moreover have "openin (product_topology Y I) (⋂B∈ℱ. (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (Y i)) ∩ B)"
if "ℱ ≠ {}"
proof -
show ?thesis
proof (rule openin_Inter)
show "⋀X. X ∈ (∩) (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (Y i)) ` ℱ ⟹ openin (product_topology Y I) X"
unfolding openin_product_topology relative_to_def
apply (clarify intro!: arbitrary_union_of_inc)
using subsetD [OF ℱ]
by (metis (mono_tags, lifting) finite_intersection_of_inc mem_Collect_eq topspace_product_topology)
qed (use ‹finite ℱ› ‹ℱ ≠ {}› in auto)
qed
ultimately show "openin (product_topology Y I) ((Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (Y i)) ∩ ⋂ℱ)"
by (auto simp only: Int_Inter_eq split: if_split)
qed
next
have eqf: "(λj∈I. f j)(i:=f i) = f"
using PiE_arb V ‹f ∈ V› by force
show "f i ∈ ?T"
using V assms ‹f ∈ V› by (auto simp: PiE_iff eqf)
next
show "?T ⊆ (λf. f i) ` V"
unfolding V by (auto simp: intro!: rev_image_eqI)
qed
qed
qed
qed
lemma retraction_map_product_projection:
assumes "i ∈ I"
shows "(retraction_map (product_topology X I) (X i) (λx. x i) ⟷
((product_topology X I) = trivial_topology) ⟶ (X i) = trivial_topology)"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
assume ?lhs
then show ?rhs
using retraction_imp_surjective_map
by (metis image_empty subtopology_eq_discrete_topology_empty)
next
assume R: ?rhs
show ?lhs
proof (cases "(product_topology X I) = trivial_topology")
case True
then show ?thesis
using R by (auto simp: retraction_map_def retraction_maps_def)
next
case False
have *: "∃g. continuous_map (X i) (product_topology X I) g ∧ (∀x∈topspace (X i). g x i = x)"
if z: "z ∈ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i))" for z
proof -
have cm: "continuous_map (X i) (X j) (λx. if j = i then x else z j)" if "j ∈ I" for j
using ‹j ∈ I› z by (case_tac "j = i") auto
show ?thesis
using ‹i ∈ I› that
by (rule_tac x="λx j. if j = i then x else z j" in exI) (auto simp: continuous_map_componentwise PiE_iff extensional_def cm)
qed
with ‹i ∈ I› False assms show ?thesis
by (auto simp: retraction_map_def retraction_maps_def simp flip: null_topspace_iff_trivial)
qed
qed
subsection ‹Open Pi-sets in the product topology›
proposition openin_PiE_gen:
"openin (product_topology X I) (PiE I S) ⟷
PiE I S = {} ∨
finite {i ∈ I. S i ≠ topspace (X i)} ∧ (∀i ∈ I. openin (X i) (S i))"
(is "?lhs ⟷ _ ∨ ?rhs")
proof (cases "PiE I S = {}")
case False
moreover have "?lhs = ?rhs"
proof
assume L: ?lhs
moreover
obtain z where z: "z ∈ PiE I S"
using False by blast
ultimately obtain U where fin: "finite {i ∈ I. U i ≠ topspace (X i)}"
and "Pi⇩E I U ≠ {}"
and sub: "Pi⇩E I U ⊆ Pi⇩E I S"
by (fastforce simp add: openin_product_topology_alt)
then have *: "⋀i. i ∈ I ⟹ U i ⊆ S i"
by (simp add: subset_PiE)
show ?rhs
proof (intro conjI ballI)
show "finite {i ∈ I. S i ≠ topspace (X i)}"
apply (rule finite_subset [OF _ fin], clarify)
using *
by (metis False L openin_subset topspace_product_topology subset_PiE subset_antisym)
next
fix i :: "'a"
assume "i ∈ I"
then show "openin (X i) (S i)"
using open_map_product_projection [of i I X] L
apply (simp add: open_map_def)
apply (drule_tac x="PiE I S" in spec)
apply (simp add: False image_projection_PiE split: if_split_asm)
done
qed
next
assume ?rhs
then show ?lhs
unfolding openin_product_topology
by (intro arbitrary_union_of_inc) (auto simp: product_topology_base_alt)
qed
ultimately show ?thesis
by simp
qed simp
corollary openin_PiE:
"finite I ⟹ openin (product_topology X I) (PiE I S) ⟷ PiE I S = {} ∨ (∀i ∈ I. openin (X i) (S i))"
by (simp add: openin_PiE_gen)
proposition compact_space_product_topology:
"compact_space(product_topology X I) ⟷
(product_topology X I) = trivial_topology ∨ (∀i ∈ I. compact_space(X i))"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof (cases "(product_topology X I) = trivial_topology")
case False
then obtain z where z: "z ∈ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace(X i))"
by (auto simp flip: null_topspace_iff_trivial)
show ?thesis
proof
assume L: ?lhs
show ?rhs
proof (clarsimp simp add: False compact_space_def)
fix i
assume "i ∈ I"
with L have "continuous_map (product_topology X I) (X i) (λf. f i)"
by (simp add: continuous_map_product_projection)
moreover
have "⋀x. x ∈ topspace (X i) ⟹ x ∈ (λf. f i) ` (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i))"
using ‹i ∈ I› z by (rule_tac x="z(i:=x)" in image_eqI) auto
then have "(λf. f i) ` (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i)) = topspace (X i)"
using ‹i ∈ I› z by auto
ultimately show "compactin (X i) (topspace (X i))"
by (metis L compact_space_def image_compactin topspace_product_topology)
qed
next
assume R: ?rhs
show ?lhs
proof (cases "I = {}")
case True
with R show ?thesis
by (simp add: compact_space_def)
next
case False
then obtain i where "i ∈ I"
by blast
show ?thesis
using R
proof
assume com [rule_format]: "∀i∈I. compact_space (X i)"
let ?𝒞 = "{{f. f i ∈ U} |i U. i ∈ I ∧ openin (X i) U}"
show "compact_space (product_topology X I)"
proof (rule Alexander_subbase_alt)
show "topspace (product_topology X I) ⊆ ⋃?𝒞"
unfolding topspace_product_topology using ‹i ∈ I› by blast
next
fix C
assume Csub: "C ⊆ ?𝒞" and UC: "topspace (product_topology X I) ⊆ ⋃C"
define 𝒟 where "𝒟 ≡ λi. {U. openin (X i) U ∧ {f. f i ∈ U} ∈ C}"
show "∃C'. finite C' ∧ C' ⊆ C ∧ topspace (product_topology X I) ⊆ ⋃C'"
proof (cases "∃i. i ∈ I ∧ topspace (X i) ⊆ ⋃(𝒟 i)")
case True
then obtain i where "i ∈ I"
and i: "topspace (X i) ⊆ ⋃(𝒟 i)"
unfolding 𝒟_def by blast
then have *: "⋀𝒰. ⟦Ball 𝒰 (openin (X i)); topspace (X i) ⊆ ⋃𝒰⟧ ⟹
∃ℱ. finite ℱ ∧ ℱ ⊆ 𝒰 ∧ topspace (X i) ⊆ ⋃ℱ"
using com [OF ‹i ∈ I›] by (auto simp: compact_space_def compactin_def)
have "topspace (X i) ⊆ ⋃(𝒟 i)"
using i by auto
with * obtain ℱ where "finite ℱ ∧ ℱ ⊆ (𝒟 i) ∧ topspace (X i) ⊆ ⋃ℱ"
unfolding 𝒟_def by fastforce
with ‹i ∈ I› show ?thesis
unfolding 𝒟_def
by (rule_tac x="(λU. {x. x i ∈ U}) ` ℱ" in exI) auto
next
case False
then have "∀i ∈ I. ∃y. y ∈ topspace (X i) ∧ y ∉ ⋃(𝒟 i)"
by force
then obtain g where g: "⋀i. i ∈ I ⟹ g i ∈ topspace (X i) ∧ g i ∉ ⋃(𝒟 i)"
by metis
then have "(λi. if i ∈ I then g i else undefined) ∈ topspace (product_topology X I)"
by (simp add: PiE_I)
moreover have "(λi. if i ∈ I then g i else undefined) ∉ ⋃C"
using Csub g unfolding 𝒟_def by force
ultimately show ?thesis
using UC by blast
qed
qed (simp add: product_topology)
qed simp
qed
qed
qed auto
corollary compactin_PiE:
"compactin (product_topology X I) (PiE I S) ⟷
PiE I S = {} ∨ (∀i ∈ I. compactin (X i) (S i))"
by (fastforce simp add: compactin_subspace subtopology_product_topology compact_space_product_topology
subset_PiE product_topology_trivial_iff subtopology_trivial_iff)
lemma in_product_topology_closure_of:
"z ∈ (product_topology X I) closure_of S
⟹ i ∈ I ⟹ z i ∈ ((X i) closure_of ((λx. x i) ` S))"
using continuous_map_product_projection
by (force simp: continuous_map_eq_image_closure_subset image_subset_iff)
lemma homeomorphic_space_singleton_product:
"product_topology X {k} homeomorphic_space (X k)"
unfolding homeomorphic_space
apply (rule_tac x="λx. x k" in exI)
apply (rule bijective_open_imp_homeomorphic_map)
apply (simp_all add: continuous_map_product_projection open_map_product_projection)
unfolding PiE_over_singleton_iff
apply (auto simp: image_iff inj_on_def)
done
subsection‹Relationship with connected spaces, paths, etc.›
proposition connected_space_product_topology:
"connected_space(product_topology X I) ⟷
(∃i ∈ I. X i = trivial_topology) ∨ (∀i ∈ I. connected_space(X i))"
(is "?lhs ⟷ ?eq ∨ ?rhs")
proof (cases ?eq)
case False
moreover have "?lhs = ?rhs"
proof
assume ?lhs
moreover
have "connectedin(X i) (topspace(X i))"
if "i ∈ I" and ci: "connectedin(product_topology X I) (topspace(product_topology X I))" for i
proof -
have cm: "continuous_map (product_topology X I) (X i) (λf. f i)"
by (simp add: ‹i ∈ I› continuous_map_product_projection)
show ?thesis
using connectedin_continuous_map_image [OF cm ci] ‹i ∈ I›
by (simp add: False image_projection_PiE PiE_eq_empty_iff)
qed
ultimately show ?rhs
by (meson connectedin_topspace)
next
assume cs [rule_format]: ?rhs
have False
if disj: "U ∩ V = {}" and subUV: "(Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i)) ⊆ U ∪ V"
and U: "openin (product_topology X I) U"
and V: "openin (product_topology X I) V"
and "U ≠ {}" "V ≠ {}"
for U V
proof -
obtain f where "f ∈ U"
using ‹U ≠ {}› by blast
then have f: "f ∈ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i))"
using U openin_subset by fastforce
have "U ⊆ topspace(product_topology X I)" "V ⊆ topspace(product_topology X I)"
using U V openin_subset by blast+
moreover have "(Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i)) ⊆ U"
proof -
obtain C where "(finite intersection_of (λF. ∃i U. F = {x. x i ∈ U} ∧ i ∈ I ∧ openin (X i) U) relative_to
(Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i))) C" "C ⊆ U" "f ∈ C"
using U ‹f ∈ U› unfolding openin_product_topology union_of_def by auto
then obtain 𝒯 where "finite 𝒯"
and t: "⋀C. C ∈ 𝒯 ⟹ ∃i u. (i ∈ I ∧ openin (X i) u) ∧ C = {x. x i ∈ u}"
and subU: "topspace (product_topology X I) ∩ ⋂𝒯 ⊆ U"
and ftop: "f ∈ topspace (product_topology X I)"
and fint: "f ∈ ⋂ 𝒯"
by (fastforce simp: relative_to_def intersection_of_def subset_iff)
let ?L = "⋃C∈𝒯. {i. (λx. x i) ` C ⊂ topspace (X i)}"
obtain L where "finite L"
and L: "⋀i U. ⟦i ∈ I; openin (X i) U; U ⊂ topspace(X i); {x. x i ∈ U} ∈ 𝒯⟧ ⟹ i ∈ L"
proof
show "finite ?L"
proof (rule finite_Union)
fix M
assume "M ∈ (λC. {i. (λx. x i) ` C ⊂ topspace (X i)}) ` 𝒯"
then obtain C where "C ∈ 𝒯" and C: "M = {i. (λx. x i) ` C ⊂ topspace (X i)}"
by blast
then obtain j V where "j ∈ I" and ope: "openin (X j) V" and Ceq: "C = {x. x j ∈ V}"
using t by meson
then have "f j ∈ V"
using ‹C ∈ 𝒯› fint by force
then have "(λx. x k) ` {x. x j ∈ V} = UNIV" if "k ≠ j" for k
using that
apply (clarsimp simp add: set_eq_iff)
apply (rule_tac x="f(k:=x)" in image_eqI, auto)
done
then have "{i. (λx. x i) ` C ⊂ topspace (X i)} ⊆ {j}"
using Ceq by auto
then show "finite M"
using C finite_subset by fastforce
qed (use ‹finite 𝒯› in blast)
next
fix i U
assume "i ∈ I" and ope: "openin (X i) U" and psub: "U ⊂ topspace (X i)" and int: "{x. x i ∈ U} ∈ 𝒯"
then show "i ∈ ?L"
by (rule_tac a="{x. x i ∈ U}" in UN_I) (force+)
qed
show ?thesis
proof
fix h
assume h: "h ∈ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i))"
define g where "g ≡ λi. if i ∈ L then f i else h i"
have gin: "g ∈ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i))"
unfolding g_def using f h by auto
moreover have "g ∈ X" if "X ∈ 𝒯" for X
using fint openin_subset t [OF that] L g_def h that by fastforce
ultimately have "g ∈ U"
using subU by auto
have "h ∈ U" if "finite M" "h ∈ PiE I (topspace ∘ X)" "{i ∈ I. h i ≠ g i} ⊆ M" for M h
using that
proof (induction arbitrary: h)
case empty
then show ?case
using PiE_ext ‹g ∈ U› gin by force
next
case (insert i M)
define f where "f ≡ h(i:=g i)"
have fin: "f ∈ PiE I (topspace ∘ X)"
unfolding f_def using gin insert.prems(1) by auto
have subM: "{j ∈ I. f j ≠ g j} ⊆ M"
unfolding f_def using insert.prems(2) by auto
have "f ∈ U"
using insert.IH [OF fin subM] .
show ?case
proof (cases "h ∈ V")
case True
show ?thesis
proof (cases "i ∈ I")
case True
let ?U = "{x ∈ topspace(X i). h(i:=x) ∈ U}"
let ?V = "{x ∈ topspace(X i). h(i:=x) ∈ V}"
have False
proof (rule connected_spaceD [OF cs [OF ‹i ∈ I›]])
have "⋀k. k ∈ I ⟹ continuous_map (X i) (X k) (λx. if k = i then x else h k)"
using continuous_map_eq_topcontinuous_at insert.prems(1) topcontinuous_at_def by fastforce
then have cm: "continuous_map (X i) (product_topology X I) (λx. h(i:=x))"
using ‹i ∈ I› insert.prems(1)
by (auto simp: continuous_map_componentwise extensional_def)
show "openin (X i) ?U"
by (rule openin_continuous_map_preimage [OF cm U])
show "openin (X i) ?V"
by (rule openin_continuous_map_preimage [OF cm V])
show "topspace (X i) ⊆ ?U ∪ ?V"
proof clarsimp
fix x
assume "x ∈ topspace (X i)" and "h(i:=x) ∉ V"
with True subUV ‹h ∈ Pi⇩E I (topspace ∘ X)›
show "h(i:=x) ∈ U"
by (force dest: subsetD [where c="h(i:=x)"])
qed
show "?U ∩ ?V = {}"
using disj by blast
show "?U ≠ {}"
using True ‹f ∈ U› f_def gin by auto
show "?V ≠ {}"
using True ‹h ∈ V› V openin_subset by fastforce
qed
then show ?thesis ..
next
case False
show ?thesis
using insert.prems(1) by (metis False gin PiE_E ‹f ∈ U› f_def fun_upd_triv)
qed
next
case False
then show ?thesis
using subUV insert.prems(1) by auto
qed
qed
then show "h ∈ U"
unfolding g_def using PiE_iff ‹finite L› h by fastforce
qed
qed
ultimately show ?thesis
using disj inf_absorb2 ‹V ≠ {}› by fastforce
qed
then show ?lhs
unfolding connected_space_def
by auto
qed
ultimately show ?thesis
by simp
qed (metis connected_space_trivial_topology product_topology_trivial_iff)
lemma connectedin_PiE:
"connectedin (product_topology X I) (PiE I S) ⟷
PiE I S = {} ∨ (∀i ∈ I. connectedin (X i) (S i))"
by (auto simp: connectedin_def subtopology_product_topology connected_space_product_topology subset_PiE
PiE_eq_empty_iff subtopology_trivial_iff)
lemma path_connected_space_product_topology:
"path_connected_space(product_topology X I) ⟷
topspace(product_topology X I) = {} ∨ (∀i ∈ I. path_connected_space(X i))"
(is "?lhs ⟷ ?eq ∨ ?rhs")
proof (cases ?eq)
case False
moreover have "?lhs = ?rhs"
proof
assume L: ?lhs
show ?rhs
proof (clarsimp simp flip: path_connectedin_topspace)
fix i :: "'a"
assume "i ∈ I"
have cm: "continuous_map (product_topology X I) (X i) (λf. f i)"
by (simp add: ‹i ∈ I› continuous_map_product_projection)
show "path_connectedin (X i) (topspace (X i))"
using path_connectedin_continuous_map_image [OF cm L [unfolded path_connectedin_topspace [symmetric]]]
by (metis ‹i ∈ I› False retraction_imp_surjective_map retraction_map_product_projection topspace_discrete_topology)
qed
next
assume R [rule_format]: ?rhs
show ?lhs
unfolding path_connected_space_def topspace_product_topology
proof clarify
fix x y
assume x: "x ∈ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i))" and y: "y ∈ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i))"
have "∀i. ∃g. i ∈ I ⟶ pathin (X i) g ∧ g 0 = x i ∧ g 1 = y i"
using PiE_mem R path_connected_space_def x y by force
then obtain g where g: "⋀i. i ∈ I ⟹ pathin (X i) (g i) ∧ g i 0 = x i ∧ g i 1 = y i"
by metis
with x y show "∃g. pathin (product_topology X I) g ∧ g 0 = x ∧ g 1 = y"
apply (rule_tac x="λa. λi ∈ I. g i a" in exI)
apply (force simp: pathin_def continuous_map_componentwise)
done
qed
qed
ultimately show ?thesis
by simp
next
qed (force simp: path_connected_space_topspace_empty iff: null_topspace_iff_trivial)
lemma path_connectedin_PiE:
"path_connectedin (product_topology X I) (PiE I S) ⟷
PiE I S = {} ∨ (∀i ∈ I. path_connectedin (X i) (S i))"
by (fastforce simp add: path_connectedin_def subtopology_product_topology path_connected_space_product_topology subset_PiE PiE_eq_empty_iff topspace_subtopology_subset)
subsection ‹Projections from a function topology to a component›
lemma quotient_map_product_projection:
assumes "i ∈ I"
shows "quotient_map(product_topology X I) (X i) (λx. x i) ⟷
((product_topology X I) = trivial_topology ⟶ (X i) = trivial_topology)"
by (metis (no_types) assms image_is_empty null_topspace_iff_trivial quotient_imp_surjective_map
retraction_imp_quotient_map retraction_map_product_projection)
lemma product_topology_homeomorphic_component:
assumes "i ∈ I" "⋀j. ⟦j ∈ I; j ≠ i⟧ ⟹ ∃a. topspace(X j) = {a}"
shows "product_topology X I homeomorphic_space (X i)"
proof -
have "quotient_map (product_topology X I) (X i) (λx. x i)"
using assms by (metis (full_types) discrete_topology_unique empty_not_insert
product_topology_trivial_iff quotient_map_product_projection)
moreover
have "inj_on (λx. x i) (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i))"
using assms by (auto simp: inj_on_def PiE_iff) (metis extensionalityI singletonD)
ultimately show ?thesis
unfolding homeomorphic_space_def
by (rule_tac x="λx. x i" in exI) (simp add: homeomorphic_map_def flip: homeomorphic_map_maps)
qed
lemma topological_property_of_product_component:
assumes major: "P (product_topology X I)"
and minor: "⋀z i. ⟦z ∈ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace(X i)); P(product_topology X I); i ∈ I⟧
⟹ P(subtopology (product_topology X I) (PiE I (λj. if j = i then topspace(X i) else {z j})))"
(is "⋀z i. ⟦_; _; _⟧ ⟹ P (?SX z i)")
and PQ: "⋀X X'. X homeomorphic_space X' ⟹ (P X ⟷ Q X')"
shows "(∃i∈I. (X i) = trivial_topology) ∨ (∀i ∈ I. Q(X i))"
proof -
have "Q(X i)" if "∀i∈I. (X i) ≠ trivial_topology" "i ∈ I" for i
proof -
from that obtain f where f: "f ∈ (Π⇩E i∈I. topspace (X i))"
by (meson null_topspace_iff_trivial PiE_eq_empty_iff ex_in_conv)
have "?SX f i homeomorphic_space X i"
using f product_topology_homeomorphic_component [OF ‹i ∈ I›, of "λj. subtopology (X j) (if j = i then topspace (X i) else {f j})"]
by (force simp add: subtopology_product_topology)
then show ?thesis
using minor [OF f major ‹i ∈ I›] PQ by auto
qed
then show ?thesis by metis
qed
subsection ‹Limits›
text ‹The original HOL Light proof was a mess, yuk›
lemma limitin_componentwise:
"limitin (product_topology X I) f l F ⟷
l ∈ extensional I ∧
eventually (λa. f a ∈ topspace(product_topology X I)) F ∧
(∀i ∈ I. limitin (X i) (λc. f c i) (l i) F)"
(is "?L ⟷ _ ∧ ?R1 ∧ ?R2")
proof (cases "l ∈ extensional I")
case l: True
show ?thesis
proof (cases "∀i∈I. l i ∈ topspace (X i)")
case True
have ?R1 if ?L
by (metis limitin_subtopology subtopology_topspace that)
moreover
have ?R2 if ?L
unfolding limitin_def
proof (intro conjI strip)
fix i U
assume "i ∈ I" and U: "openin (X i) U ∧ l i ∈ U"
then have "openin (product_topology X I) ({y. y i ∈ U} ∩ topspace (product_topology X I))"
unfolding openin_product_topology arbitrary_union_of_relative_to [symmetric]
apply (simp add: relative_to_def topspace_product_topology_alt)
by (smt (verit, del_insts) Collect_cong arbitrary_union_of_inc finite_intersection_of_inc inf_commute)
moreover have "l ∈ {y. y i ∈ U} ∩ topspace (product_topology X I)"
using U True l by (auto simp: extensional_def)
ultimately have "eventually (λx. f x ∈ {y. y i ∈ U} ∩ topspace (product_topology X I)) F"
by (metis limitin_def that)
then show "∀⇩F x in F. f x i ∈ U"
by (simp add: eventually_conj_iff)
qed (use True in auto)
moreover
have ?L if R1: ?R1 and R2: ?R2
unfolding limitin_def openin_product_topology all_union_of imp_conjL arbitrary_def
proof (intro conjI strip)
show l: "l ∈ topspace (product_topology X I)"
by (simp add: PiE_iff True l)
fix 𝒱
assume "𝒱 ⊆ Collect (finite intersection_of (λF. ∃i U. F = {f. f i ∈ U} ∧ i ∈ I ∧ openin (X i) U)
relative_to topspace (product_topology X I))"
and "l ∈ ⋃ 𝒱"
then obtain 𝒲 where "finite 𝒲" and 𝒲X: "∀X∈𝒲. l ∈ X"
and 𝒲: "⋀C. C ∈ 𝒲 ⟹ C ∈ {{x. x i ∈ U} |i U. i ∈ I ∧ openin (X i) U}"
and 𝒲𝒱: "topspace (product_topology X I) ∩ ⋂ 𝒲 ∈ 𝒱"
by (fastforce simp: intersection_of_def relative_to_def subset_eq)
have "∀⇩F x in F. f x ∈ topspace (product_topology X I) ∩ ⋂𝒲"
proof -
have "⋀W. W ∈ {{x. x i ∈ U} | i U. i ∈ I ∧ openin (X i) U} ⟹ W ∈ 𝒲 ⟹ ∀⇩F x in F. f x ∈ W"
using 𝒲X R2 by (auto simp: limitin_def)
with 𝒲 have "∀⇩F x in F. ∀W∈𝒲. f x ∈ W"
by (simp add: ‹finite 𝒲› eventually_ball_finite)
with R1 show ?thesis
by (simp add: eventually_conj_iff)
qed
then show "∀⇩F x in F. f x ∈ ⋃𝒱"
by (smt (verit, ccfv_threshold) 𝒲𝒱 UnionI eventually_mono)
qed
ultimately show ?thesis
using l by blast
next
case False
then show ?thesis
by (metis PiE_iff limitin_def topspace_product_topology)
qed
next
case False
then show ?thesis
by (simp add: limitin_def PiE_iff)
qed
end