Theory MTX_Examples
section ‹ Verification examples ›
theory MTX_Examples
imports
MTX_Flows
Hybrid_Systems_VCs.HS_VC_Spartan
begin
subsection ‹ Examples ›
abbreviation hoareT :: "('a ⇒ bool) ⇒ ('a ⇒ 'a set) ⇒ ('a ⇒ bool) ⇒ bool"
(‹PRE_ HP _ POST _› [85,85]85) where "PRE P HP X POST Q ≡ (P ≤ |X]Q)"
subsubsection ‹ Verification by uniqueness. ›
abbreviation mtx_circ :: "2 sq_mtx" (‹A›)
where "A ≡ mtx
([0, 1] #
[-1, 0] # [])"
abbreviation mtx_circ_flow :: "real ⇒ real^2 ⇒ real^2" (‹φ›)
where "φ t s ≡ (χ i. if i = 1 then s$1 * cos t + s$2 * sin t else - s$1 * sin t + s$2 * cos t)"
lemma mtx_circ_flow_eq: "exp (t *⇩R A) *⇩V s = φ t s"
apply(rule local_flow.eq_solution[OF local_flow_sq_mtx_linear, symmetric, of _ "λs. UNIV"], simp_all)
apply(rule ivp_solsI, simp_all add: sq_mtx_vec_mult_eq vec_eq_iff)
unfolding UNIV_2 using exhaust_2
by (force intro!: poly_derivatives simp: matrix_vector_mult_def)+
lemma mtx_circ:
"PRE(λs. r⇧2 = (s $ 1)⇧2 + (s $ 2)⇧2)
HP x´=(*⇩V) A & G
POST (λs. r⇧2 = (s $ 1)⇧2 + (s $ 2)⇧2)"
apply(subst local_flow.fbox_g_ode_subset[OF local_flow_sq_mtx_linear])
unfolding mtx_circ_flow_eq by auto
no_notation mtx_circ (‹A›)
and mtx_circ_flow (‹φ›)
subsubsection ‹ Flow of diagonalisable matrix. ›
abbreviation mtx_hOsc :: "real ⇒ real ⇒ 2 sq_mtx" (‹A›)
where "A a b ≡ mtx
([0, 1] #
[a, b] # [])"
abbreviation mtx_chB_hOsc :: "real ⇒ real ⇒ 2 sq_mtx" (‹P›)
where "P a b ≡ mtx
([a, b] #
[1, 1] # [])"
lemma inv_mtx_chB_hOsc:
"a ≠ b ⟹ (P a b)⇧-⇧1 = (1/(a - b)) *⇩R mtx
([ 1, -b] #
[-1, a] # [])"
apply(rule sq_mtx_inv_unique, unfold scaleR_mtx2 times_mtx2)
by (simp add: diff_divide_distrib[symmetric] one_mtx2)+
lemma invertible_mtx_chB_hOsc: "a ≠ b ⟹ mtx_invertible (P a b)"
apply(rule mtx_invertibleI[of _ "(P a b)⇧-⇧1"])
apply(unfold inv_mtx_chB_hOsc scaleR_mtx2 times_mtx2 one_mtx2)
by (subst sq_mtx_eq_iff, simp add: vector_def frac_diff_eq1)+
lemma mtx_hOsc_diagonalizable:
fixes a b :: real
defines "ι⇩1 ≡ (b - sqrt (b^2+4*a))/2" and "ι⇩2 ≡ (b + sqrt (b^2+4*a))/2"
assumes "b⇧2 + a * 4 > 0" and "a ≠ 0"
shows "A a b = P (-ι⇩2/a) (-ι⇩1/a) * (𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗀 i. if i = 1 then ι⇩1 else ι⇩2) * (P (-ι⇩2/a) (-ι⇩1/a))⇧-⇧1"
unfolding assms apply(subst inv_mtx_chB_hOsc)
using assms(3,4) apply(simp_all add: diag2_eq[symmetric])
unfolding sq_mtx_times_eq sq_mtx_scaleR_eq UNIV_2 apply(subst sq_mtx_eq_iff)
using exhaust_2 assms by (auto simp: field_simps, auto simp: field_power_simps)
lemma mtx_hOsc_solution_eq:
fixes a b :: real
defines "ι⇩1 ≡ (b - sqrt (b⇧2+4*a))/2" and "ι⇩2 ≡ (b + sqrt (b⇧2+4*a))/2"
defines "Φ t ≡ mtx (
[ι⇩2*exp(t*ι⇩1) - ι⇩1*exp(t*ι⇩2), exp(t*ι⇩2)-exp(t*ι⇩1)]#
[a*exp(t*ι⇩2) - a*exp(t*ι⇩1), ι⇩2*exp(t*ι⇩2)-ι⇩1*exp(t*ι⇩1)]#[])"
assumes "b⇧2 + a * 4 > 0" and "a ≠ 0"
shows "P (-ι⇩2/a) (-ι⇩1/a) * (𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗀 i. exp (t * (if i=1 then ι⇩1 else ι⇩2))) * (P (-ι⇩2/a) (-ι⇩1/a))⇧-⇧1
= (1/sqrt (b⇧2 + a * 4)) *⇩R (Φ t)"
unfolding assms apply(subst inv_mtx_chB_hOsc)
using assms apply(simp_all add: mtx_times_scaleR_commute, subst sq_mtx_eq_iff)
unfolding UNIV_2 sq_mtx_times_eq sq_mtx_scaleR_eq sq_mtx_uminus_eq apply(simp_all add: axis_def)
by (auto simp: field_simps, auto simp: field_power_simps)+
lemma local_flow_mtx_hOsc:
fixes a b
defines "ι⇩1 ≡ (b - sqrt (b^2+4*a))/2" and "ι⇩2 ≡ (b + sqrt (b^2+4*a))/2"
defines "Φ t ≡ mtx (
[ι⇩2*exp(t*ι⇩1) - ι⇩1*exp(t*ι⇩2), exp(t*ι⇩2)-exp(t*ι⇩1)]#
[a*exp(t*ι⇩2) - a*exp(t*ι⇩1), ι⇩2*exp(t*ι⇩2)-ι⇩1*exp(t*ι⇩1)]#[])"
assumes "b⇧2 + a * 4 > 0" and "a ≠ 0"
shows "local_flow ((*⇩V) (A a b)) UNIV UNIV (λt. (*⇩V) ((1/sqrt (b⇧2 + a * 4)) *⇩R Φ t))"
unfolding assms using local_flow_sq_mtx_linear[of "A a b"] assms
apply(subst (asm) exp_scaleR_diagonal2[OF invertible_mtx_chB_hOsc mtx_hOsc_diagonalizable])
apply(simp, simp, simp)
by (subst (asm) mtx_hOsc_solution_eq) simp_all
lemma overdamped_door_arith:
assumes "b⇧2 + a * 4 > 0" and "a < 0" and "b ≤ 0" and "t ≥ 0" and "s1 > 0"
shows "0 ≤ ((b + sqrt (b⇧2 + 4 * a)) * exp (t * (b - sqrt (b⇧2 + 4 * a)) / 2) / 2 -
(b - sqrt (b⇧2 + 4 * a)) * exp (t * (b + sqrt (b⇧2 + 4 * a)) / 2) / 2) * s1 / sqrt (b⇧2 + a * 4)"
proof(subst diff_divide_distrib[symmetric], simp)
have f0: "s1 / (2 * sqrt (b⇧2 + a * 4)) > 0" (is "s1/?c3 > 0")
using assms(1,5) by simp
have f1: "(b - sqrt (b⇧2 + 4 * a)) < (b + sqrt (b⇧2 + 4 * a))" (is "?c2 < ?c1")
and f2: "(b + sqrt (b⇧2 + 4 * a)) < 0"
using sqrt_ge_absD[of b "b⇧2 + 4 * a"] assms by (force, linarith)
hence f3: "exp (t * ?c2 / 2) ≤ exp (t * ?c1 / 2)" (is "exp ?t1 ≤ exp ?t2")
unfolding exp_le_cancel_iff
using assms(4) by (case_tac "t=0", simp_all)
hence "?c2 * exp ?t2 ≤ ?c2 * exp ?t1"
using f1 f2 mult_le_cancel_left_pos[of "-?c2" "exp ?t1" "exp ?t2"] by linarith
also have "... < ?c1 * exp ?t1"
using f1 by auto
also have"... ≤ ?c1 * exp ?t1"
using f1 f2 by auto
ultimately show "0 ≤ (?c1 * exp ?t1 - ?c2 * exp ?t2) * s1 / ?c3"
using f0 f1 assms(5) by auto
qed
abbreviation "open_door s ≡ {s. s$1 > 0 ∧ s$2 = 0}"
lemma overdamped_door:
assumes "b⇧2 + a * 4 > 0" and "a < 0" and "b ≤ 0"
shows "PRE (λs. s$1 = 0)
HP (LOOP open_door; (x´=((*⇩V) (A a b)) & G) INV (λs. 0 ≤ s$1))
POST (λs. 0 ≤ s $ 1)"
apply(rule fbox_loopI, simp_all add: le_fun_def)
apply(subst local_flow.fbox_g_ode_subset[OF local_flow_mtx_hOsc[OF assms(1)]])
using assms apply(simp_all add: le_fun_def fbox_def)
unfolding sq_mtx_scaleR_eq UNIV_2 sq_mtx_vec_mult_eq
by (clarsimp simp: overdamped_door_arith)
no_notation mtx_hOsc (‹A›)
and mtx_chB_hOsc (‹P›)
subsubsection ‹ Flow of non-diagonalisable matrix. ›
abbreviation mtx_cnst_acc :: "3 sq_mtx" (‹K›)
where "K ≡ mtx (
[0,1,0] #
[0,0,1] #
[0,0,0] # [])"
lemma pow2_scaleR_mtx_cnst_acc: "(t *⇩R K)⇧2 = mtx (
[0,0,t⇧2] #
[0,0,0] #
[0,0,0] # [])"
unfolding power2_eq_square apply(subst sq_mtx_eq_iff)
unfolding sq_mtx_times_eq UNIV_3 by auto
lemma powN_scaleR_mtx_cnst_acc: "n > 2 ⟹ (t *⇩R K)^n = 0"
apply(induct n, simp, case_tac "n ≤ 2")
apply(subgoal_tac "n = 2", erule ssubst)
unfolding power_Suc2 pow2_scaleR_mtx_cnst_acc sq_mtx_times_eq UNIV_3
by (auto simp: sq_mtx_eq_iff)
lemma exp_mtx_cnst_acc: "exp (t *⇩R K) = ((t *⇩R K)⇧2/⇩R 2) + (t *⇩R K) + 1"
unfolding exp_def apply(subst suminf_eq_sum[of 2])
using powN_scaleR_mtx_cnst_acc by (simp_all add: numeral_2_eq_2)
lemma exp_mtx_cnst_acc_simps:
"exp (t *⇩R K) $$ 1 $ 1 = 1" "exp (t *⇩R K) $$ 1 $ 2 = t" "exp (t *⇩R K) $$ 1 $ 3 = t^2/2"
"exp (t *⇩R K) $$ 2 $ 1 = 0" "exp (t *⇩R K) $$ 2 $ 2 = 1" "exp (t *⇩R K) $$ 2 $ 3 = t"
"exp (t *⇩R K) $$ 3 $ 1 = 0" "exp (t *⇩R K) $$ 3 $ 2 = 0" "exp (t *⇩R K) $$ 3 $ 3 = 1"
unfolding exp_mtx_cnst_acc one_mtx3 pow2_scaleR_mtx_cnst_acc by simp_all
lemma exp_mtx_cnst_acc_vec_mult_eq: "exp (t *⇩R K) *⇩V s =
vector [s$3 * t^2/2 + s$2 * t + s$1, s$3 * t + s$2, s$3]"
apply(subst exp_mtx_cnst_acc, subst pow2_scaleR_mtx_cnst_acc)
apply(simp add: sq_mtx_vec_mult_eq vector_def)
unfolding UNIV_3 by (simp add: fun_eq_iff)
lemma local_flow_mtx_cnst_acc:
"local_flow ((*⇩V) K) UNIV UNIV (λt s. ((t *⇩R K)⇧2/⇩R 2 + (t *⇩R K) + 1) *⇩V s)"
using local_flow_sq_mtx_linear[of K] unfolding exp_mtx_cnst_acc .
lemma docking_station_arith:
assumes "(d::real) > x" and "v > 0"
shows "(v = v⇧2 * t / (2 * d - 2 * x)) ⟷ (v * t - v⇧2 * t⇧2 / (4 * d - 4 * x) + x = d)"
proof
assume "v = v⇧2 * t / (2 * d - 2 * x)"
hence "v * t = 2 * (d - x)"
using assms by (simp add: eq_divide_eq power2_eq_square)
hence "v * t - v⇧2 * t⇧2 / (4 * d - 4 * x) + x = 2 * (d - x) - 4 * (d - x)⇧2 / (4 * (d - x)) + x"
apply(subst power_mult_distrib[symmetric])
by (erule ssubst, subst power_mult_distrib, simp)
also have "... = d"
apply(simp only: mult_divide_mult_cancel_left_if)
using assms by (auto simp: power2_eq_square)
finally show "v * t - v⇧2 * t⇧2 / (4 * d - 4 * x) + x = d" .
next
assume "v * t - v⇧2 * t⇧2 / (4 * d - 4 * x) + x = d"
hence "0 = v⇧2 * t⇧2 / (4 * (d - x)) + (d - x) - v * t"
by auto
hence "0 = (4 * (d - x)) * (v⇧2 * t⇧2 / (4 * (d - x)) + (d - x) - v * t)"
by auto
also have "... = v⇧2 * t⇧2 + 4 * (d - x)⇧2 - (4 * (d - x)) * (v * t)"
using assms apply(simp add: distrib_left right_diff_distrib)
apply(subst right_diff_distrib[symmetric])+
by (simp add: power2_eq_square)
also have "... = (v * t - 2 * (d - x))⇧2"
by (simp only: power2_diff, auto simp: field_simps power2_diff)
finally have "0 = (v * t - 2 * (d - x))⇧2" .
hence "v * t = 2 * (d - x)"
by auto
thus "v = v⇧2 * t / (2 * d - 2 * x)"
apply(subst power2_eq_square, subst mult.assoc)
apply(erule ssubst, subst right_diff_distrib[symmetric])
using assms by auto
qed
lemma docking_station:
assumes "d > x⇩0" and "v⇩0 > 0"
shows "PRE (λs. s$1 = x⇩0 ∧ s$2 = v⇩0)
HP ((3 ::= (λs. -(v⇩0^2/(2*(d-x⇩0))))); x´=(*⇩V) K & G)
POST (λs. s$2 = 0 ⟷ s$1 = d)"
apply(clarsimp simp: le_fun_def local_flow.fbox_g_ode_subset[OF local_flow_sq_mtx_linear[of K]])
unfolding exp_mtx_cnst_acc_vec_mult_eq using assms by (simp add: docking_station_arith)
no_notation mtx_cnst_acc (‹K›)
end