Theory BVSpec
section ‹ The Bytecode Verifier \label{sec:BVSpec} ›
theory BVSpec
imports Effect
begin
text ‹
This theory contains a specification of the BV. The specification
describes correct typings of method bodies; it corresponds
to type \emph{checking}.
›
definition
check_types :: "'m prog ⇒ nat ⇒ nat ⇒ ty⇩i' err list ⇒ bool"
where
"check_types P mxs mxl τs ≡ set τs ⊆ states P mxs mxl"
definition
wt_instr :: "['m prog,ty,nat,pc,ex_table,instr,pc,ty⇩m] ⇒ bool"
(‹_,_,_,_,_ ⊢ _,_ :: _› [60,0,0,0,0,0,0,61] 60)
where
"P,T,mxs,mpc,xt ⊢ i,pc :: τs ≡
app i P mxs T pc mpc xt (τs!pc) ∧
(∀(pc',τ') ∈ set (eff i P pc xt (τs!pc)). P ⊢ τ' ≤' τs!pc')"
definition wt_start :: "['m prog,cname,staticb,ty list,nat,ty⇩m] ⇒ bool"
where
"wt_start P C b Ts mxl⇩0 τs ≡
case b of NonStatic ⇒ P ⊢ Some ([],OK (Class C)#map OK Ts@replicate mxl⇩0 Err) ≤' τs!0
| Static ⇒ P ⊢ Some ([],map OK Ts@replicate mxl⇩0 Err) ≤' τs!0"
definition wt_method :: "['m prog,cname,staticb,ty list,ty,nat,nat,instr list,
ex_table,ty⇩m] ⇒ bool"
where
"wt_method P C b Ts T⇩r mxs mxl⇩0 is xt τs ≡ (b = Static ∨ b = NonStatic) ∧
0 < size is ∧ size τs = size is ∧
check_types P mxs ((case b of Static ⇒ 0 | NonStatic ⇒ 1)+size Ts+mxl⇩0) (map OK τs) ∧
wt_start P C b Ts mxl⇩0 τs ∧
(∀pc < size is. P,T⇩r,mxs,size is,xt ⊢ is!pc,pc :: τs)"
definition wf_jvm_prog_phi :: "ty⇩P ⇒ jvm_prog ⇒ bool" (‹wf'_jvm'_prog⇘_⇙›)
where
"wf_jvm_prog⇘Φ⇙ ≡
wf_prog (λP C (M,b,Ts,T⇩r,(mxs,mxl⇩0,is,xt)).
wt_method P C b Ts T⇩r mxs mxl⇩0 is xt (Φ C M))"
definition wf_jvm_prog :: "jvm_prog ⇒ bool"
where
"wf_jvm_prog P ≡ ∃Φ. wf_jvm_prog⇘Φ⇙ P"
lemma wt_jvm_progD:
"wf_jvm_prog⇘Φ⇙ P ⟹ ∃wt. wf_prog wt P"
by (unfold wf_jvm_prog_phi_def, blast)
lemma wt_jvm_prog_impl_wt_instr:
assumes wf: "wf_jvm_prog⇘Φ⇙ P" and
sees: "P ⊢ C sees M,b:Ts → T = (mxs,mxl⇩0,ins,xt) in C" and
pc: "pc < size ins"
shows "P,T,mxs,size ins,xt ⊢ ins!pc,pc :: Φ C M"
proof -
have wfm: "wf_prog
(λP C (M, b, Ts, T⇩r, mxs, mxl⇩0, is, xt).
wt_method P C b Ts T⇩r mxs mxl⇩0 is xt (Φ C M)) P" using wf
by (unfold wf_jvm_prog_phi_def)
show ?thesis using sees_wf_mdecl[OF wfm sees] pc
by (simp add: wf_mdecl_def wt_method_def)
qed
lemma wt_jvm_prog_impl_wt_start:
assumes wf: "wf_jvm_prog⇘Φ⇙ P" and
sees: "P ⊢ C sees M,b:Ts → T = (mxs,mxl⇩0,ins,xt) in C"
shows "0 < size ins ∧ wt_start P C b Ts mxl⇩0 (Φ C M)"
proof -
have wfm: "wf_prog
(λP C (M, b, Ts, T⇩r, mxs, mxl⇩0, is, xt).
wt_method P C b Ts T⇩r mxs mxl⇩0 is xt (Φ C M)) P" using wf
by (unfold wf_jvm_prog_phi_def)
show ?thesis using sees_wf_mdecl[OF wfm sees]
by (simp add: wf_mdecl_def wt_method_def)
qed
lemma wf_jvm_prog_nclinit:
assumes wtp: "wf_jvm_prog⇘Φ⇙ P"
and meth: "P ⊢ C sees M, b : Ts→T = (mxs, mxl⇩0, ins, xt) in D"
and wt: "P,T,mxs,size ins,xt ⊢ ins!pc,pc :: Φ C M"
and pc: "pc < length ins" and Φ: "Φ C M ! pc = Some(ST,LT)"
and ins: "ins ! pc = Invokestatic C⇩0 M⇩0 n"
shows "M⇩0 ≠ clinit"
using assms by(simp add: wf_jvm_prog_phi_def wt_instr_def app_def)
end