Theory HOL-Library.Complete_Partial_Order2
section ‹Formalisation of chain-complete partial orders, continuity and admissibility›
theory Complete_Partial_Order2
imports Main
begin
unbundle lattice_syntax
lemma chain_transfer [transfer_rule]:
includes lifting_syntax
shows "((A ===> A ===> (=)) ===> rel_set A ===> (=)) Complete_Partial_Order.chain Complete_Partial_Order.chain"
unfolding chain_def[abs_def] by transfer_prover
lemma linorder_chain [simp, intro!]:
fixes Y :: "_ :: linorder set"
shows "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) Y"
by(auto intro: chainI)
lemma fun_lub_apply: "⋀Sup. fun_lub Sup Y x = Sup ((λf. f x) ` Y)"
by(simp add: fun_lub_def image_def)
lemma fun_lub_empty [simp]: "fun_lub lub {} = (λ_. lub {})"
by(rule ext)(simp add: fun_lub_apply)
lemma chain_fun_ordD:
assumes "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (fun_ord le) Y"
shows "Complete_Partial_Order.chain le ((λf. f x) ` Y)"
by(rule chainI)(auto dest: chainD[OF assms] simp add: fun_ord_def)
lemma chain_Diff:
"Complete_Partial_Order.chain ord A
⟹ Complete_Partial_Order.chain ord (A - B)"
by(erule chain_subset) blast
lemma chain_rel_prodD1:
"Complete_Partial_Order.chain (rel_prod orda ordb) Y
⟹ Complete_Partial_Order.chain orda (fst ` Y)"
by(auto 4 3 simp add: chain_def)
lemma chain_rel_prodD2:
"Complete_Partial_Order.chain (rel_prod orda ordb) Y
⟹ Complete_Partial_Order.chain ordb (snd ` Y)"
by(auto 4 3 simp add: chain_def)
context ccpo begin
lemma ccpo_fun: "class.ccpo (fun_lub Sup) (fun_ord (≤)) (mk_less (fun_ord (≤)))"
by standard (auto 4 3 simp add: mk_less_def fun_ord_def fun_lub_apply
intro: order.trans order.antisym chain_imageI ccpo_Sup_upper ccpo_Sup_least)
lemma ccpo_Sup_below_iff: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) Y ⟹ Sup Y ≤ x ⟷ (∀y∈Y. y ≤ x)"
by(fast intro: order_trans[OF ccpo_Sup_upper] ccpo_Sup_least)
lemma Sup_minus_bot:
assumes chain: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) A"
shows "⨆(A - {⨆{}}) = ⨆A"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof (rule order.antisym)
show "?lhs ≤ ?rhs"
by (blast intro: ccpo_Sup_least chain_Diff[OF chain] ccpo_Sup_upper[OF chain])
show "?rhs ≤ ?lhs"
proof (rule ccpo_Sup_least [OF chain])
show "x ∈ A ⟹ x ≤ ?lhs" for x
by (cases "x = ⨆{}")
(blast intro: ccpo_Sup_least chain_empty ccpo_Sup_upper[OF chain_Diff[OF chain]])+
qed
qed
lemma mono_lub:
fixes le_b (infix ‹⊑› 60)
assumes chain: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (fun_ord (≤)) Y"
and mono: "⋀f. f ∈ Y ⟹ monotone le_b (≤) f"
shows "monotone (⊑) (≤) (fun_lub Sup Y)"
proof(rule monotoneI)
fix x y
assume "x ⊑ y"
have chain'': "⋀x. Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) ((λf. f x) ` Y)"
using chain by(rule chain_imageI)(simp add: fun_ord_def)
then show "fun_lub Sup Y x ≤ fun_lub Sup Y y" unfolding fun_lub_apply
proof(rule ccpo_Sup_least)
fix x'
assume "x' ∈ (λf. f x) ` Y"
then obtain f where "f ∈ Y" "x' = f x" by blast
note ‹x' = f x› also
from ‹f ∈ Y› ‹x ⊑ y› have "f x ≤ f y" by(blast dest: mono monotoneD)
also have "… ≤ ⨆((λf. f y) ` Y)" using chain''
by(rule ccpo_Sup_upper)(simp add: ‹f ∈ Y›)
finally show "x' ≤ ⨆((λf. f y) ` Y)" .
qed
qed
context
fixes le_b (infix ‹⊑› 60) and Y f
assumes chain: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain le_b Y"
and mono1: "⋀y. y ∈ Y ⟹ monotone le_b (≤) (λx. f x y)"
and mono2: "⋀x a b. ⟦ x ∈ Y; a ⊑ b; a ∈ Y; b ∈ Y ⟧ ⟹ f x a ≤ f x b"
begin
lemma Sup_mono:
assumes le: "x ⊑ y" and x: "x ∈ Y" and y: "y ∈ Y"
shows "⨆(f x ` Y) ≤ ⨆(f y ` Y)" (is "_ ≤ ?rhs")
proof(rule ccpo_Sup_least)
from chain show chain': "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) (f x ` Y)" when "x ∈ Y" for x
by(rule chain_imageI) (insert that, auto dest: mono2)
fix x'
assume "x' ∈ f x ` Y"
then obtain y' where "y' ∈ Y" "x' = f x y'" by blast note this(2)
also from mono1[OF ‹y' ∈ Y›] le have "… ≤ f y y'" by(rule monotoneD)
also have "… ≤ ?rhs" using chain'[OF y]
by (auto intro!: ccpo_Sup_upper simp add: ‹y' ∈ Y›)
finally show "x' ≤ ?rhs" .
qed(rule x)
lemma diag_Sup: "⨆((λx. ⨆(f x ` Y)) ` Y) = ⨆((λx. f x x) ` Y)" (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof(rule order.antisym)
have chain1: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) ((λx. ⨆(f x ` Y)) ` Y)"
using chain by(rule chain_imageI)(rule Sup_mono)
have chain2: "⋀y'. y' ∈ Y ⟹ Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) (f y' ` Y)" using chain
by(rule chain_imageI)(auto dest: mono2)
have chain3: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) ((λx. f x x) ` Y)"
using chain by(rule chain_imageI)(auto intro: monotoneD[OF mono1] mono2 order.trans)
show "?lhs ≤ ?rhs" using chain1
proof(rule ccpo_Sup_least)
fix x'
assume "x' ∈ (λx. ⨆(f x ` Y)) ` Y"
then obtain y' where "y' ∈ Y" "x' = ⨆(f y' ` Y)" by blast note this(2)
also have "… ≤ ?rhs" using chain2[OF ‹y' ∈ Y›]
proof(rule ccpo_Sup_least)
fix x
assume "x ∈ f y' ` Y"
then obtain y where "y ∈ Y" and x: "x = f y' y" by blast
define y'' where "y'' = (if y ⊑ y' then y' else y)"
from chain ‹y ∈ Y› ‹y' ∈ Y› have "y ⊑ y' ∨ y' ⊑ y" by(rule chainD)
hence "f y' y ≤ f y'' y''" using ‹y ∈ Y› ‹y' ∈ Y›
by(auto simp add: y''_def intro: mono2 monotoneD[OF mono1])
also from ‹y ∈ Y› ‹y' ∈ Y› have "y'' ∈ Y" by(simp add: y''_def)
from chain3 have "f y'' y'' ≤ ?rhs" by(rule ccpo_Sup_upper)(simp add: ‹y'' ∈ Y›)
finally show "x ≤ ?rhs" by(simp add: x)
qed
finally show "x' ≤ ?rhs" .
qed
show "?rhs ≤ ?lhs" using chain3
proof(rule ccpo_Sup_least)
fix y
assume "y ∈ (λx. f x x) ` Y"
then obtain x where "x ∈ Y" and "y = f x x" by blast note this(2)
also from chain2[OF ‹x ∈ Y›] have "… ≤ ⨆(f x ` Y)"
by(rule ccpo_Sup_upper)(simp add: ‹x ∈ Y›)
also have "… ≤ ?lhs" by(rule ccpo_Sup_upper[OF chain1])(simp add: ‹x ∈ Y›)
finally show "y ≤ ?lhs" .
qed
qed
end
lemma Sup_image_mono_le:
fixes le_b (infix ‹⊑› 60) and Sup_b (‹⋁›)
assumes ccpo: "class.ccpo Sup_b (⊑) lt_b"
assumes chain: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (⊑) Y"
and mono: "⋀x y. ⟦ x ⊑ y; x ∈ Y ⟧ ⟹ f x ≤ f y"
shows "Sup (f ` Y) ≤ f (⋁Y)"
proof(rule ccpo_Sup_least)
show "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) (f ` Y)"
using chain by(rule chain_imageI)(rule mono)
fix x
assume "x ∈ f ` Y"
then obtain y where "y ∈ Y" and "x = f y" by blast note this(2)
also have "y ⊑ ⋁Y" using ccpo chain ‹y ∈ Y› by(rule ccpo.ccpo_Sup_upper)
hence "f y ≤ f (⋁Y)" using ‹y ∈ Y› by(rule mono)
finally show "x ≤ …" .
qed
lemma swap_Sup:
fixes le_b (infix ‹⊑› 60)
assumes Y: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (⊑) Y"
and Z: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (fun_ord (≤)) Z"
and mono: "⋀f. f ∈ Z ⟹ monotone (⊑) (≤) f"
shows "⨆((λx. ⨆(x ` Y)) ` Z) = ⨆((λx. ⨆((λf. f x) ` Z)) ` Y)"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof(cases "Y = {}")
case True
then show ?thesis
by (simp add: image_constant_conv cong del: SUP_cong_simp)
next
case False
have chain1: "⋀f. f ∈ Z ⟹ Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) (f ` Y)"
by(rule chain_imageI[OF Y])(rule monotoneD[OF mono])
have chain2: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) ((λx. ⨆(x ` Y)) ` Z)" using Z
proof(rule chain_imageI)
fix f g
assume "f ∈ Z" "g ∈ Z"
and "fun_ord (≤) f g"
from chain1[OF ‹f ∈ Z›] show "⨆(f ` Y) ≤ ⨆(g ` Y)"
proof(rule ccpo_Sup_least)
fix x
assume "x ∈ f ` Y"
then obtain y where "y ∈ Y" "x = f y" by blast note this(2)
also have "… ≤ g y" using ‹fun_ord (≤) f g› by(simp add: fun_ord_def)
also have "… ≤ ⨆(g ` Y)" using chain1[OF ‹g ∈ Z›]
by(rule ccpo_Sup_upper)(simp add: ‹y ∈ Y›)
finally show "x ≤ ⨆(g ` Y)" .
qed
qed
have chain3: "⋀x. Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) ((λf. f x) ` Z)"
using Z by(rule chain_imageI)(simp add: fun_ord_def)
have chain4: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) ((λx. ⨆((λf. f x) ` Z)) ` Y)"
using Y
proof(rule chain_imageI)
fix f x y
assume "x ⊑ y"
show "⨆((λf. f x) ` Z) ≤ ⨆((λf. f y) ` Z)" (is "_ ≤ ?rhs") using chain3
proof(rule ccpo_Sup_least)
fix x'
assume "x' ∈ (λf. f x) ` Z"
then obtain f where "f ∈ Z" "x' = f x" by blast note this(2)
also have "f x ≤ f y" using ‹f ∈ Z› ‹x ⊑ y› by(rule monotoneD[OF mono])
also have "f y ≤ ?rhs" using chain3
by(rule ccpo_Sup_upper)(simp add: ‹f ∈ Z›)
finally show "x' ≤ ?rhs" .
qed
qed
from chain2 have "?lhs ≤ ?rhs"
proof(rule ccpo_Sup_least)
fix x
assume "x ∈ (λx. ⨆(x ` Y)) ` Z"
then obtain f where "f ∈ Z" "x = ⨆(f ` Y)" by blast note this(2)
also have "… ≤ ?rhs" using chain1[OF ‹f ∈ Z›]
proof(rule ccpo_Sup_least)
fix x'
assume "x' ∈ f ` Y"
then obtain y where "y ∈ Y" "x' = f y" by blast note this(2)
also have "f y ≤ ⨆((λf. f y) ` Z)" using chain3
by(rule ccpo_Sup_upper)(simp add: ‹f ∈ Z›)
also have "… ≤ ?rhs" using chain4 by(rule ccpo_Sup_upper)(simp add: ‹y ∈ Y›)
finally show "x' ≤ ?rhs" .
qed
finally show "x ≤ ?rhs" .
qed
moreover
have "?rhs ≤ ?lhs" using chain4
proof(rule ccpo_Sup_least)
fix x
assume "x ∈ (λx. ⨆((λf. f x) ` Z)) ` Y"
then obtain y where "y ∈ Y" "x = ⨆((λf. f y) ` Z)" by blast note this(2)
also have "… ≤ ?lhs" using chain3
proof(rule ccpo_Sup_least)
fix x'
assume "x' ∈ (λf. f y) ` Z"
then obtain f where "f ∈ Z" "x' = f y" by blast note this(2)
also have "f y ≤ ⨆(f ` Y)" using chain1[OF ‹f ∈ Z›]
by(rule ccpo_Sup_upper)(simp add: ‹y ∈ Y›)
also have "… ≤ ?lhs" using chain2
by(rule ccpo_Sup_upper)(simp add: ‹f ∈ Z›)
finally show "x' ≤ ?lhs" .
qed
finally show "x ≤ ?lhs" .
qed
ultimately show "?lhs = ?rhs"
by (rule order.antisym)
qed
lemma fixp_mono:
assumes fg: "fun_ord (≤) f g"
and f: "monotone (≤) (≤) f"
and g: "monotone (≤) (≤) g"
shows "ccpo_class.fixp f ≤ ccpo_class.fixp g"
unfolding fixp_def
proof(rule ccpo_Sup_least)
fix x
assume "x ∈ ccpo_class.iterates f"
thus "x ≤ ⨆ccpo_class.iterates g"
proof induction
case (step x)
from f step.IH have "f x ≤ f (⨆ccpo_class.iterates g)" by(rule monotoneD)
also have "… ≤ g (⨆ccpo_class.iterates g)" using fg by(simp add: fun_ord_def)
also have "… = ⨆ccpo_class.iterates g" by(fold fixp_def fixp_unfold[OF g]) simp
finally show ?case .
qed(blast intro: ccpo_Sup_least)
qed(rule chain_iterates[OF f])
context fixes ordb :: "'b ⇒ 'b ⇒ bool" (infix ‹⊑› 60) begin
lemma iterates_mono:
assumes f: "f ∈ ccpo.iterates (fun_lub Sup) (fun_ord (≤)) F"
and mono: "⋀f. monotone (⊑) (≤) f ⟹ monotone (⊑) (≤) (F f)"
shows "monotone (⊑) (≤) f"
using f
by(induction rule: ccpo.iterates.induct[OF ccpo_fun, consumes 1, case_names step Sup])(blast intro: mono mono_lub)+
lemma fixp_preserves_mono:
assumes mono: "⋀x. monotone (fun_ord (≤)) (≤) (λf. F f x)"
and mono2: "⋀f. monotone (⊑) (≤) f ⟹ monotone (⊑) (≤) (F f)"
shows "monotone (⊑) (≤) (ccpo.fixp (fun_lub Sup) (fun_ord (≤)) F)"
(is "monotone _ _ ?fixp")
proof(rule monotoneI)
have mono: "monotone (fun_ord (≤)) (fun_ord (≤)) F"
by(rule monotoneI)(auto simp add: fun_ord_def intro: monotoneD[OF mono])
let ?iter = "ccpo.iterates (fun_lub Sup) (fun_ord (≤)) F"
have chain: "⋀x. Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) ((λf. f x) ` ?iter)"
by(rule chain_imageI[OF ccpo.chain_iterates[OF ccpo_fun mono]])(simp add: fun_ord_def)
fix x y
assume "x ⊑ y"
show "?fixp x ≤ ?fixp y"
apply (simp only: ccpo.fixp_def[OF ccpo_fun] fun_lub_apply)
using chain
proof(rule ccpo_Sup_least)
fix x'
assume "x' ∈ (λf. f x) ` ?iter"
then obtain f where "f ∈ ?iter" "x' = f x" by blast note this(2)
also have "f x ≤ f y"
by(rule monotoneD[OF iterates_mono[OF ‹f ∈ ?iter› mono2]])(blast intro: ‹x ⊑ y›)+
also have "f y ≤ ⨆((λf. f y) ` ?iter)" using chain
by(rule ccpo_Sup_upper)(simp add: ‹f ∈ ?iter›)
finally show "x' ≤ …" .
qed
qed
end
end
lemma monotone2monotone:
assumes 2: "⋀x. monotone ordb ordc (λy. f x y)"
and t: "monotone orda ordb (λx. t x)"
and 1: "⋀y. monotone orda ordc (λx. f x y)"
and trans: "transp ordc"
shows "monotone orda ordc (λx. f x (t x))"
by(blast intro: monotoneI transpD[OF trans] monotoneD[OF t] monotoneD[OF 2] monotoneD[OF 1])
subsection ‹Continuity›
definition cont :: "('a set ⇒ 'a) ⇒ ('a ⇒ 'a ⇒ bool) ⇒ ('b set ⇒ 'b) ⇒ ('b ⇒ 'b ⇒ bool) ⇒ ('a ⇒ 'b) ⇒ bool"
where
"cont luba orda lubb ordb f ⟷
(∀Y. Complete_Partial_Order.chain orda Y ⟶ Y ≠ {} ⟶ f (luba Y) = lubb (f ` Y))"
definition mcont :: "('a set ⇒ 'a) ⇒ ('a ⇒ 'a ⇒ bool) ⇒ ('b set ⇒ 'b) ⇒ ('b ⇒ 'b ⇒ bool) ⇒ ('a ⇒ 'b) ⇒ bool"
where
"mcont luba orda lubb ordb f ⟷
monotone orda ordb f ∧ cont luba orda lubb ordb f"
subsubsection ‹Theorem collection ‹cont_intro››
named_theorems cont_intro "continuity and admissibility intro rules"
ML ‹
fun cont_intro_tac ctxt =
REPEAT_ALL_NEW (resolve_tac ctxt (rev (Named_Theorems.get ctxt \<^named_theorems>‹cont_intro›)))
THEN_ALL_NEW (SOLVED' (simp_tac ctxt))
fun cont_intro_simproc ctxt ct =
let
fun mk_stmt t = t
|> HOLogic.mk_Trueprop
|> Thm.cterm_of ctxt
|> Goal.init
fun mk_thm t =
if exists_subterm Term.is_Var t then
NONE
else
case SINGLE (cont_intro_tac ctxt 1) (mk_stmt t) of
SOME thm => SOME (Goal.finish ctxt thm RS @{thm Eq_TrueI})
| NONE => NONE
in
case Thm.term_of ct of
t as \<^Const_>‹ccpo.admissible _ for _ _ _› => mk_thm t
| t as \<^Const_>‹mcont _ _ for _ _ _ _ _› => mk_thm t
| t as \<^Const_>‹monotone_on _ _ for _ _ _ _› => mk_thm t
| _ => NONE
end
handle THM _ => NONE
| TYPE _ => NONE
›
simproc_setup "cont_intro"
( "ccpo.admissible lub ord P"
| "mcont lub ord lub' ord' f"
| "monotone ord ord' f"
) = ‹K cont_intro_simproc›
lemmas [cont_intro] =
call_mono
let_mono
if_mono
option.const_mono
tailrec.const_mono
bind_mono
experiment begin
text ‹The following proof by simplification diverges if variables are not handled properly.›
lemma "(⋀f. monotone R S f ⟹ thesis) ⟹ monotone R S g ⟹ thesis"
by simp
end
declare if_mono[simp]
lemma monotone_id' [cont_intro]: "monotone ord ord (λx. x)"
by(simp add: monotone_def)
lemma monotone_applyI:
"monotone orda ordb F ⟹ monotone (fun_ord orda) ordb (λf. F (f x))"
by(rule monotoneI)(auto simp add: fun_ord_def dest: monotoneD)
lemma monotone_if_fun [partial_function_mono]:
"⟦ monotone (fun_ord orda) (fun_ord ordb) F; monotone (fun_ord orda) (fun_ord ordb) G ⟧
⟹ monotone (fun_ord orda) (fun_ord ordb) (λf n. if c n then F f n else G f n)"
by(simp add: monotone_def fun_ord_def)
lemma monotone_fun_apply_fun [partial_function_mono]:
"monotone (fun_ord (fun_ord ord)) (fun_ord ord) (λf n. f t (g n))"
by(rule monotoneI)(simp add: fun_ord_def)
lemma monotone_fun_ord_apply:
"monotone orda (fun_ord ordb) f ⟷ (∀x. monotone orda ordb (λy. f y x))"
by(auto simp add: monotone_def fun_ord_def)
context preorder begin
declare transp_on_le[cont_intro]
lemma monotone_const [simp, cont_intro]: "monotone ord (≤) (λ_. c)"
by(rule monotoneI) simp
end
lemma transp_le [cont_intro, simp]:
"class.preorder ord (mk_less ord) ⟹ transp ord"
by(rule preorder.transp_on_le)
context partial_function_definitions begin
declare const_mono [cont_intro, simp]
lemma transp_le [cont_intro, simp]: "transp leq"
by(rule transpI)(rule leq_trans)
lemma preorder [cont_intro, simp]: "class.preorder leq (mk_less leq)"
by(unfold_locales)(auto simp add: mk_less_def intro: leq_refl leq_trans)
declare ccpo[cont_intro, simp]
end
lemma contI [intro?]:
"(⋀Y. ⟦ Complete_Partial_Order.chain orda Y; Y ≠ {} ⟧ ⟹ f (luba Y) = lubb (f ` Y))
⟹ cont luba orda lubb ordb f"
unfolding cont_def by blast
lemma contD:
"⟦ cont luba orda lubb ordb f; Complete_Partial_Order.chain orda Y; Y ≠ {} ⟧
⟹ f (luba Y) = lubb (f ` Y)"
unfolding cont_def by blast
lemma cont_id [simp, cont_intro]: "⋀Sup. cont Sup ord Sup ord id"
by(rule contI) simp
lemma cont_id' [simp, cont_intro]: "⋀Sup. cont Sup ord Sup ord (λx. x)"
using cont_id[unfolded id_def] .
lemma cont_applyI [cont_intro]:
assumes cont: "cont luba orda lubb ordb g"
shows "cont (fun_lub luba) (fun_ord orda) lubb ordb (λf. g (f x))"
by(rule contI)(drule chain_fun_ordD[where x=x], simp add: fun_lub_apply image_image contD[OF cont])
lemma call_cont: "cont (fun_lub lub) (fun_ord ord) lub ord (λf. f t)"
by(simp add: cont_def fun_lub_apply)
lemma cont_if [cont_intro]:
"⟦ cont luba orda lubb ordb f; cont luba orda lubb ordb g ⟧
⟹ cont luba orda lubb ordb (λx. if c then f x else g x)"
by(cases c) simp_all
lemma mcontI [intro?]:
"⟦ monotone orda ordb f; cont luba orda lubb ordb f ⟧ ⟹ mcont luba orda lubb ordb f"
by(simp add: mcont_def)
lemma mcont_mono: "mcont luba orda lubb ordb f ⟹ monotone orda ordb f"
by(simp add: mcont_def)
lemma mcont_cont [simp]: "mcont luba orda lubb ordb f ⟹ cont luba orda lubb ordb f"
by(simp add: mcont_def)
lemma mcont_monoD:
"⟦ mcont luba orda lubb ordb f; orda x y ⟧ ⟹ ordb (f x) (f y)"
by(auto simp add: mcont_def dest: monotoneD)
lemma mcont_contD:
"⟦ mcont luba orda lubb ordb f; Complete_Partial_Order.chain orda Y; Y ≠ {} ⟧
⟹ f (luba Y) = lubb (f ` Y)"
by(auto simp add: mcont_def dest: contD)
lemma mcont_call [cont_intro, simp]:
"mcont (fun_lub lub) (fun_ord ord) lub ord (λf. f t)"
by(simp add: mcont_def call_mono call_cont)
lemma mcont_id' [cont_intro, simp]: "mcont lub ord lub ord (λx. x)"
by(simp add: mcont_def monotone_id')
lemma mcont_applyI:
"mcont luba orda lubb ordb (λx. F x) ⟹ mcont (fun_lub luba) (fun_ord orda) lubb ordb (λf. F (f x))"
by(simp add: mcont_def monotone_applyI cont_applyI)
lemma mcont_if [cont_intro, simp]:
"⟦ mcont luba orda lubb ordb (λx. f x); mcont luba orda lubb ordb (λx. g x) ⟧
⟹ mcont luba orda lubb ordb (λx. if c then f x else g x)"
by(simp add: mcont_def cont_if)
lemma cont_fun_lub_apply:
"cont luba orda (fun_lub lubb) (fun_ord ordb) f ⟷ (∀x. cont luba orda lubb ordb (λy. f y x))"
by(simp add: cont_def fun_lub_def fun_eq_iff)(auto simp add: image_def)
lemma mcont_fun_lub_apply:
"mcont luba orda (fun_lub lubb) (fun_ord ordb) f ⟷ (∀x. mcont luba orda lubb ordb (λy. f y x))"
by(auto simp add: monotone_fun_ord_apply cont_fun_lub_apply mcont_def)
context ccpo begin
lemma cont_const [simp, cont_intro]: "cont luba orda Sup (≤) (λx. c)"
by (rule contI) (simp add: image_constant_conv cong del: SUP_cong_simp)
lemma mcont_const [cont_intro, simp]:
"mcont luba orda Sup (≤) (λx. c)"
by(simp add: mcont_def)
lemma cont_apply:
assumes 2: "⋀x. cont lubb ordb Sup (≤) (λy. f x y)"
and t: "cont luba orda lubb ordb (λx. t x)"
and 1: "⋀y. cont luba orda Sup (≤) (λx. f x y)"
and mono: "monotone orda ordb (λx. t x)"
and mono2: "⋀x. monotone ordb (≤) (λy. f x y)"
and mono1: "⋀y. monotone orda (≤) (λx. f x y)"
shows "cont luba orda Sup (≤) (λx. f x (t x))"
proof
fix Y
assume chain: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain orda Y" and "Y ≠ {}"
moreover from chain have chain': "Complete_Partial_Order.chain ordb (t ` Y)"
by(rule chain_imageI)(rule monotoneD[OF mono])
ultimately show "f (luba Y) (t (luba Y)) = ⨆((λx. f x (t x)) ` Y)"
by(simp add: contD[OF 1] contD[OF t] contD[OF 2] image_image)
(rule diag_Sup[OF chain], auto intro: monotone2monotone[OF mono2 mono monotone_const transpI] monotoneD[OF mono1])
qed
lemma mcont2mcont':
"⟦ ⋀x. mcont lub' ord' Sup (≤) (λy. f x y);
⋀y. mcont lub ord Sup (≤) (λx. f x y);
mcont lub ord lub' ord' (λy. t y) ⟧
⟹ mcont lub ord Sup (≤) (λx. f x (t x))"
unfolding mcont_def by(blast intro: transp_on_le monotone2monotone cont_apply)
lemma mcont2mcont:
"⟦mcont lub' ord' Sup (≤) (λx. f x); mcont lub ord lub' ord' (λx. t x)⟧
⟹ mcont lub ord Sup (≤) (λx. f (t x))"
by(rule mcont2mcont'[OF _ mcont_const])
context
fixes ord :: "'b ⇒ 'b ⇒ bool" (infix ‹⊑› 60)
and lub :: "'b set ⇒ 'b" (‹⋁›)
begin
lemma cont_fun_lub_Sup:
assumes chainM: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (fun_ord (≤)) M"
and mcont [rule_format]: "∀f∈M. mcont lub (⊑) Sup (≤) f"
shows "cont lub (⊑) Sup (≤) (fun_lub Sup M)"
proof(rule contI)
fix Y
assume chain: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (⊑) Y"
and Y: "Y ≠ {}"
from swap_Sup[OF chain chainM mcont[THEN mcont_mono]]
show "fun_lub Sup M (⋁Y) = ⨆(fun_lub Sup M ` Y)"
by(simp add: mcont_contD[OF mcont chain Y] fun_lub_apply cong: image_cong)
qed
lemma mcont_fun_lub_Sup:
"⟦ Complete_Partial_Order.chain (fun_ord (≤)) M;
∀f∈M. mcont lub ord Sup (≤) f ⟧
⟹ mcont lub (⊑) Sup (≤) (fun_lub Sup M)"
by(simp add: mcont_def cont_fun_lub_Sup mono_lub)
lemma iterates_mcont:
assumes f: "f ∈ ccpo.iterates (fun_lub Sup) (fun_ord (≤)) F"
and mono: "⋀f. mcont lub (⊑) Sup (≤) f ⟹ mcont lub (⊑) Sup (≤) (F f)"
shows "mcont lub (⊑) Sup (≤) f"
using f
by(induction rule: ccpo.iterates.induct[OF ccpo_fun, consumes 1, case_names step Sup])(blast intro: mono mcont_fun_lub_Sup)+
lemma fixp_preserves_mcont:
assumes mono: "⋀x. monotone (fun_ord (≤)) (≤) (λf. F f x)"
and mcont: "⋀f. mcont lub (⊑) Sup (≤) f ⟹ mcont lub (⊑) Sup (≤) (F f)"
shows "mcont lub (⊑) Sup (≤) (ccpo.fixp (fun_lub Sup) (fun_ord (≤)) F)"
(is "mcont _ _ _ _ ?fixp")
unfolding mcont_def
proof(intro conjI monotoneI contI)
have mono: "monotone (fun_ord (≤)) (fun_ord (≤)) F"
by(rule monotoneI)(auto simp add: fun_ord_def intro: monotoneD[OF mono])
let ?iter = "ccpo.iterates (fun_lub Sup) (fun_ord (≤)) F"
have chain: "⋀x. Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) ((λf. f x) ` ?iter)"
by(rule chain_imageI[OF ccpo.chain_iterates[OF ccpo_fun mono]])(simp add: fun_ord_def)
show "?fixp x ≤ ?fixp y" if "x ⊑ y" for x y
apply (simp only: ccpo.fixp_def[OF ccpo_fun] fun_lub_apply)
using chain
proof(rule ccpo_Sup_least)
fix x'
assume "x' ∈ (λf. f x) ` ?iter"
then obtain f where "f ∈ ?iter" "x' = f x" by blast note this(2)
also from _ ‹x ⊑ y› have "f x ≤ f y"
by(rule mcont_monoD[OF iterates_mcont[OF ‹f ∈ ?iter› mcont]])
also have "f y ≤ ⨆((λf. f y) ` ?iter)" using chain
by(rule ccpo_Sup_upper)(simp add: ‹f ∈ ?iter›)
finally show "x' ≤ …" .
qed
show "?fixp (⋁Y) = ⨆(?fixp ` Y)"
if chain: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (⊑) Y" and Y: "Y ≠ {}" for Y
proof -
have "f (⋁Y) = ⨆(f ` Y)" if "f ∈ ?iter" for f
using that mcont chain Y
by (rule mcont_contD[OF iterates_mcont])
moreover have "⨆((λf. ⨆(f ` Y)) ` ?iter) = ⨆((λx. ⨆((λf. f x) ` ?iter)) ` Y)"
using chain ccpo.chain_iterates[OF ccpo_fun mono]
by (rule swap_Sup)(rule mcont_mono[OF iterates_mcont[OF _ mcont]])
ultimately show ?thesis
unfolding ccpo.fixp_def[OF ccpo_fun]
by (simp add: fun_lub_apply cong: image_cong)
qed
qed
end
context
fixes F :: "'c ⇒ 'c" and U :: "'c ⇒ 'b ⇒ 'a" and C :: "('b ⇒ 'a) ⇒ 'c" and f
assumes mono: "⋀x. monotone (fun_ord (≤)) (≤) (λf. U (F (C f)) x)"
and eq: "f ≡ C (ccpo.fixp (fun_lub Sup) (fun_ord (≤)) (λf. U (F (C f))))"
and inverse: "⋀f. U (C f) = f"
begin
lemma fixp_preserves_mono_uc:
assumes mono2: "⋀f. monotone ord (≤) (U f) ⟹ monotone ord (≤) (U (F f))"
shows "monotone ord (≤) (U f)"
using fixp_preserves_mono[OF mono mono2] by(subst eq)(simp add: inverse)
lemma fixp_preserves_mcont_uc:
assumes mcont: "⋀f. mcont lubb ordb Sup (≤) (U f) ⟹ mcont lubb ordb Sup (≤) (U (F f))"
shows "mcont lubb ordb Sup (≤) (U f)"
using fixp_preserves_mcont[OF mono mcont] by(subst eq)(simp add: inverse)
end
lemmas fixp_preserves_mono1 = fixp_preserves_mono_uc[of "λx. x" _ "λx. x", OF _ _ refl]
lemmas fixp_preserves_mono2 =
fixp_preserves_mono_uc[of "case_prod" _ "curry", unfolded case_prod_curry curry_case_prod, OF _ _ refl]
lemmas fixp_preserves_mono3 =
fixp_preserves_mono_uc[of "λf. case_prod (case_prod f)" _ "λf. curry (curry f)", unfolded case_prod_curry curry_case_prod, OF _ _ refl]
lemmas fixp_preserves_mono4 =
fixp_preserves_mono_uc[of "λf. case_prod (case_prod (case_prod f))" _ "λf. curry (curry (curry f))", unfolded case_prod_curry curry_case_prod, OF _ _ refl]
lemmas fixp_preserves_mcont1 = fixp_preserves_mcont_uc[of "λx. x" _ "λx. x", OF _ _ refl]
lemmas fixp_preserves_mcont2 =
fixp_preserves_mcont_uc[of "case_prod" _ "curry", unfolded case_prod_curry curry_case_prod, OF _ _ refl]
lemmas fixp_preserves_mcont3 =
fixp_preserves_mcont_uc[of "λf. case_prod (case_prod f)" _ "λf. curry (curry f)", unfolded case_prod_curry curry_case_prod, OF _ _ refl]
lemmas fixp_preserves_mcont4 =
fixp_preserves_mcont_uc[of "λf. case_prod (case_prod (case_prod f))" _ "λf. curry (curry (curry f))", unfolded case_prod_curry curry_case_prod, OF _ _ refl]
end
lemma (in preorder) monotone_if_bot:
fixes bot
assumes mono: "⋀x y. ⟦ x ≤ y; ¬ (x ≤ bound) ⟧ ⟹ ord (f x) (f y)"
and bot: "⋀x. ¬ x ≤ bound ⟹ ord bot (f x)" "ord bot bot"
shows "monotone (≤) ord (λx. if x ≤ bound then bot else f x)"
by(rule monotoneI)(auto intro: bot intro: mono order_trans)
lemma (in ccpo) mcont_if_bot:
fixes bot and lub (‹⋁›) and ord (infix ‹⊑› 60)
assumes ccpo: "class.ccpo lub (⊑) lt"
and mono: "⋀x y. ⟦ x ≤ y; ¬ x ≤ bound ⟧ ⟹ f x ⊑ f y"
and cont: "⋀Y. ⟦ Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) Y; Y ≠ {}; ⋀x. x ∈ Y ⟹ ¬ x ≤ bound ⟧ ⟹ f (⨆Y) = ⋁(f ` Y)"
and bot: "⋀x. ¬ x ≤ bound ⟹ bot ⊑ f x"
shows "mcont Sup (≤) lub (⊑) (λx. if x ≤ bound then bot else f x)" (is "mcont _ _ _ _ ?g")
proof(intro mcontI contI)
interpret c: ccpo lub "(⊑)" lt by(fact ccpo)
show "monotone (≤) (⊑) ?g" by(rule monotone_if_bot)(simp_all add: mono bot)
fix Y
assume chain: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) Y" and Y: "Y ≠ {}"
show "?g (⨆Y) = ⋁(?g ` Y)"
proof(cases "Y ⊆ {x. x ≤ bound}")
case True
hence "⨆Y ≤ bound" using chain by(auto intro: ccpo_Sup_least)
moreover have "Y ∩ {x. ¬ x ≤ bound} = {}" using True by auto
ultimately show ?thesis using True Y
by (auto simp add: image_constant_conv cong del: c.SUP_cong_simp)
next
case False
let ?Y = "Y ∩ {x. ¬ x ≤ bound}"
have chain': "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) ?Y"
using chain by(rule chain_subset) simp
from False obtain y where ybound: "¬ y ≤ bound" and y: "y ∈ Y" by blast
hence "¬ ⨆Y ≤ bound" by (metis ccpo_Sup_upper chain order.trans)
hence "?g (⨆Y) = f (⨆Y)" by simp
also have "⨆Y ≤ ⨆?Y" using chain
proof(rule ccpo_Sup_least)
fix x
assume x: "x ∈ Y"
show "x ≤ ⨆?Y"
proof(cases "x ≤ bound")
case True
with chainD[OF chain x y] have "x ≤ y" using ybound by(auto intro: order_trans)
thus ?thesis by(rule order_trans)(auto intro: ccpo_Sup_upper[OF chain'] simp add: y ybound)
qed(auto intro: ccpo_Sup_upper[OF chain'] simp add: x)
qed
hence "⨆Y = ⨆?Y" by(rule order.antisym)(blast intro: ccpo_Sup_least[OF chain'] ccpo_Sup_upper[OF chain])
hence "f (⨆Y) = f (⨆?Y)" by simp
also have "f (⨆?Y) = ⋁(f ` ?Y)" using chain' by(rule cont)(insert y ybound, auto)
also have "⋁(f ` ?Y) = ⋁(?g ` Y)"
proof(cases "Y ∩ {x. x ≤ bound} = {}")
case True
hence "f ` ?Y = ?g ` Y" by auto
thus ?thesis by(rule arg_cong)
next
case False
have chain'': "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (⊑) (insert bot (f ` ?Y))"
using chain by(auto intro!: chainI bot dest: chainD intro: mono)
hence chain''': "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (⊑) (f ` ?Y)" by(rule chain_subset) blast
have "bot ⊑ ⋁(f ` ?Y)" using y ybound by(blast intro: c.order_trans[OF bot] c.ccpo_Sup_upper[OF chain'''])
hence "⋁(insert bot (f ` ?Y)) ⊑ ⋁(f ` ?Y)" using chain''
by(auto intro: c.ccpo_Sup_least c.ccpo_Sup_upper[OF chain'''])
with _ have "… = ⋁(insert bot (f ` ?Y))"
by(rule c.order.antisym)(blast intro: c.ccpo_Sup_least[OF chain'''] c.ccpo_Sup_upper[OF chain''])
also have "insert bot (f ` ?Y) = ?g ` Y" using False by auto
finally show ?thesis .
qed
finally show ?thesis .
qed
qed
context partial_function_definitions begin
lemma mcont_const [cont_intro, simp]:
"mcont luba orda lub leq (λx. c)"
by(rule ccpo.mcont_const)(rule Partial_Function.ccpo[OF partial_function_definitions_axioms])
lemmas [cont_intro, simp] =
ccpo.cont_const[OF Partial_Function.ccpo[OF partial_function_definitions_axioms]]
lemma mono2mono:
assumes "monotone ordb leq (λy. f y)" "monotone orda ordb (λx. t x)"
shows "monotone orda leq (λx. f (t x))"
using assms by(rule monotone2monotone) simp_all
lemmas mcont2mcont' = ccpo.mcont2mcont'[OF Partial_Function.ccpo[OF partial_function_definitions_axioms]]
lemmas mcont2mcont = ccpo.mcont2mcont[OF Partial_Function.ccpo[OF partial_function_definitions_axioms]]
lemmas fixp_preserves_mono1 = ccpo.fixp_preserves_mono1[OF Partial_Function.ccpo[OF partial_function_definitions_axioms]]
lemmas fixp_preserves_mono2 = ccpo.fixp_preserves_mono2[OF Partial_Function.ccpo[OF partial_function_definitions_axioms]]
lemmas fixp_preserves_mono3 = ccpo.fixp_preserves_mono3[OF Partial_Function.ccpo[OF partial_function_definitions_axioms]]
lemmas fixp_preserves_mono4 = ccpo.fixp_preserves_mono4[OF Partial_Function.ccpo[OF partial_function_definitions_axioms]]
lemmas fixp_preserves_mcont1 = ccpo.fixp_preserves_mcont1[OF Partial_Function.ccpo[OF partial_function_definitions_axioms]]
lemmas fixp_preserves_mcont2 = ccpo.fixp_preserves_mcont2[OF Partial_Function.ccpo[OF partial_function_definitions_axioms]]
lemmas fixp_preserves_mcont3 = ccpo.fixp_preserves_mcont3[OF Partial_Function.ccpo[OF partial_function_definitions_axioms]]
lemmas fixp_preserves_mcont4 = ccpo.fixp_preserves_mcont4[OF Partial_Function.ccpo[OF partial_function_definitions_axioms]]
lemma monotone_if_bot:
fixes bot
assumes g: "⋀x. g x = (if leq x bound then bot else f x)"
and mono: "⋀x y. ⟦ leq x y; ¬ leq x bound ⟧ ⟹ ord (f x) (f y)"
and bot: "⋀x. ¬ leq x bound ⟹ ord bot (f x)" "ord bot bot"
shows "monotone leq ord g"
unfolding g[abs_def] using preorder mono bot by(rule preorder.monotone_if_bot)
lemma mcont_if_bot:
fixes bot
assumes ccpo: "class.ccpo lub' ord (mk_less ord)"
and bot: "⋀x. ¬ leq x bound ⟹ ord bot (f x)"
and g: "⋀x. g x = (if leq x bound then bot else f x)"
and mono: "⋀x y. ⟦ leq x y; ¬ leq x bound ⟧ ⟹ ord (f x) (f y)"
and cont: "⋀Y. ⟦ Complete_Partial_Order.chain leq Y; Y ≠ {}; ⋀x. x ∈ Y ⟹ ¬ leq x bound ⟧ ⟹ f (lub Y) = lub' (f ` Y)"
shows "mcont lub leq lub' ord g"
unfolding g[abs_def] using ccpo mono cont bot by(rule ccpo.mcont_if_bot[OF Partial_Function.ccpo[OF partial_function_definitions_axioms]])
end
subsection ‹Admissibility›
lemma admissible_subst:
assumes adm: "ccpo.admissible luba orda (λx. P x)"
and mcont: "mcont lubb ordb luba orda f"
shows "ccpo.admissible lubb ordb (λx. P (f x))"
apply(rule ccpo.admissibleI)
apply(frule (1) mcont_contD[OF mcont])
apply(auto intro: ccpo.admissibleD[OF adm] chain_imageI dest: mcont_monoD[OF mcont])
done
lemmas [simp, cont_intro] =
admissible_all
admissible_ball
admissible_const
admissible_conj
lemma admissible_disj' [simp, cont_intro]:
"⟦ class.ccpo lub ord (mk_less ord); ccpo.admissible lub ord P; ccpo.admissible lub ord Q ⟧
⟹ ccpo.admissible lub ord (λx. P x ∨ Q x)"
by(rule ccpo.admissible_disj)
lemma admissible_imp' [cont_intro]:
"⟦ class.ccpo lub ord (mk_less ord);
ccpo.admissible lub ord (λx. ¬ P x);
ccpo.admissible lub ord (λx. Q x) ⟧
⟹ ccpo.admissible lub ord (λx. P x ⟶ Q x)"
unfolding imp_conv_disj by(rule ccpo.admissible_disj)
lemma admissible_imp [cont_intro]:
"(Q ⟹ ccpo.admissible lub ord (λx. P x))
⟹ ccpo.admissible lub ord (λx. Q ⟶ P x)"
by(rule ccpo.admissibleI)(auto dest: ccpo.admissibleD)
lemma admissible_not_mem' [THEN admissible_subst, cont_intro, simp]:
shows admissible_not_mem: "ccpo.admissible Union (⊆) (λA. x ∉ A)"
by(rule ccpo.admissibleI) auto
lemma admissible_eqI:
assumes f: "cont luba orda lub ord (λx. f x)"
and g: "cont luba orda lub ord (λx. g x)"
shows "ccpo.admissible luba orda (λx. f x = g x)"
apply(rule ccpo.admissibleI)
apply(simp_all add: contD[OF f] contD[OF g] cong: image_cong)
done
corollary admissible_eq_mcontI [cont_intro]:
"⟦ mcont luba orda lub ord (λx. f x);
mcont luba orda lub ord (λx. g x) ⟧
⟹ ccpo.admissible luba orda (λx. f x = g x)"
by(rule admissible_eqI)(auto simp add: mcont_def)
lemma admissible_iff [cont_intro, simp]:
"⟦ ccpo.admissible lub ord (λx. P x ⟶ Q x); ccpo.admissible lub ord (λx. Q x ⟶ P x) ⟧
⟹ ccpo.admissible lub ord (λx. P x ⟷ Q x)"
by(subst iff_conv_conj_imp)(rule admissible_conj)
context ccpo begin
lemma admissible_leI:
assumes f: "mcont luba orda Sup (≤) (λx. f x)"
and g: "mcont luba orda Sup (≤) (λx. g x)"
shows "ccpo.admissible luba orda (λx. f x ≤ g x)"
proof(rule ccpo.admissibleI)
fix A
assume chain: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain orda A"
and le: "∀x∈A. f x ≤ g x"
and False: "A ≠ {}"
have "f (luba A) = ⨆(f ` A)" by(simp add: mcont_contD[OF f] chain False)
also have "… ≤ ⨆(g ` A)"
proof(rule ccpo_Sup_least)
from chain show "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) (f ` A)"
by(rule chain_imageI)(rule mcont_monoD[OF f])
fix x
assume "x ∈ f ` A"
then obtain y where "y ∈ A" "x = f y" by blast note this(2)
also have "f y ≤ g y" using le ‹y ∈ A› by simp
also have "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (≤) (g ` A)"
using chain by(rule chain_imageI)(rule mcont_monoD[OF g])
hence "g y ≤ ⨆(g ` A)" by(rule ccpo_Sup_upper)(simp add: ‹y ∈ A›)
finally show "x ≤ …" .
qed
also have "… = g (luba A)" by(simp add: mcont_contD[OF g] chain False)
finally show "f (luba A) ≤ g (luba A)" .
qed
end
lemma admissible_leI:
fixes ord (infix ‹⊑› 60) and lub (‹⋁›)
assumes "class.ccpo lub (⊑) (mk_less (⊑))"
and "mcont luba orda lub (⊑) (λx. f x)"
and "mcont luba orda lub (⊑) (λx. g x)"
shows "ccpo.admissible luba orda (λx. f x ⊑ g x)"
using assms by(rule ccpo.admissible_leI)
declare ccpo_class.admissible_leI[cont_intro]
context ccpo begin
lemma admissible_not_below: "ccpo.admissible Sup (≤) (λx. ¬ (≤) x y)"
by(rule ccpo.admissibleI)(simp add: ccpo_Sup_below_iff)
end
lemma (in preorder) preorder [cont_intro, simp]: "class.preorder (≤) (mk_less (≤))"
by(unfold_locales)(auto simp add: mk_less_def intro: order_trans)
context partial_function_definitions begin
lemmas [cont_intro, simp] =
admissible_leI[OF Partial_Function.ccpo[OF partial_function_definitions_axioms]]
ccpo.admissible_not_below[THEN admissible_subst, OF Partial_Function.ccpo[OF partial_function_definitions_axioms]]
end
setup ‹Sign.map_naming (Name_Space.mandatory_path "ccpo")›
inductive compact :: "('a set ⇒ 'a) ⇒ ('a ⇒ 'a ⇒ bool) ⇒ 'a ⇒ bool"
for lub ord x
where compact:
"⟦ ccpo.admissible lub ord (λy. ¬ ord x y);
ccpo.admissible lub ord (λy. x ≠ y) ⟧
⟹ compact lub ord x"
setup ‹Sign.map_naming Name_Space.parent_path›
context ccpo begin
lemma compactI:
assumes "ccpo.admissible Sup (≤) (λy. ¬ x ≤ y)"
shows "ccpo.compact Sup (≤) x"
using assms
proof(rule ccpo.compact.intros)
have neq: "(λy. x ≠ y) = (λy. ¬ x ≤ y ∨ ¬ y ≤ x)" by(auto)
show "ccpo.admissible Sup (≤) (λy. x ≠ y)"
by(subst neq)(rule admissible_disj admissible_not_below assms)+
qed
lemma compact_bot:
assumes "x = Sup {}"
shows "ccpo.compact Sup (≤) x"
proof(rule compactI)
show "ccpo.admissible Sup (≤) (λy. ¬ x ≤ y)" using assms
by(auto intro!: ccpo.admissibleI intro: ccpo_Sup_least chain_empty)
qed
end
lemma admissible_compact_neq' [THEN admissible_subst, cont_intro, simp]:
shows admissible_compact_neq: "ccpo.compact lub ord k ⟹ ccpo.admissible lub ord (λx. k ≠ x)"
by(simp add: ccpo.compact.simps)
lemma admissible_neq_compact' [THEN admissible_subst, cont_intro, simp]:
shows admissible_neq_compact: "ccpo.compact lub ord k ⟹ ccpo.admissible lub ord (λx. x ≠ k)"
by(subst eq_commute)(rule admissible_compact_neq)
context partial_function_definitions begin
lemmas [cont_intro, simp] = ccpo.compact_bot[OF Partial_Function.ccpo[OF partial_function_definitions_axioms]]
end
context ccpo begin
lemma fixp_strong_induct:
assumes [cont_intro]: "ccpo.admissible Sup (≤) P"
and mono: "monotone (≤) (≤) f"
and bot: "P (⨆{})"
and step: "⋀x. ⟦ x ≤ ccpo_class.fixp f; P x ⟧ ⟹ P (f x)"
shows "P (ccpo_class.fixp f)"
proof(rule fixp_induct[where P="λx. x ≤ ccpo_class.fixp f ∧ P x", THEN conjunct2])
note [cont_intro] = admissible_leI
show "ccpo.admissible Sup (≤) (λx. x ≤ ccpo_class.fixp f ∧ P x)" by simp
next
show "⨆{} ≤ ccpo_class.fixp f ∧ P (⨆{})"
by(auto simp add: bot intro: ccpo_Sup_least chain_empty)
next
fix x
assume "x ≤ ccpo_class.fixp f ∧ P x"
thus "f x ≤ ccpo_class.fixp f ∧ P (f x)"
by(subst fixp_unfold[OF mono])(auto dest: monotoneD[OF mono] intro: step)
qed(rule mono)
end
context partial_function_definitions begin
lemma fixp_strong_induct_uc:
fixes F :: "'c ⇒ 'c"
and U :: "'c ⇒ 'b ⇒ 'a"
and C :: "('b ⇒ 'a) ⇒ 'c"
and P :: "('b ⇒ 'a) ⇒ bool"
assumes mono: "⋀x. mono_body (λf. U (F (C f)) x)"
and eq: "f ≡ C (fixp_fun (λf. U (F (C f))))"
and inverse: "⋀f. U (C f) = f"
and adm: "ccpo.admissible lub_fun le_fun P"
and bot: "P (λ_. lub {})"
and step: "⋀f'. ⟦ P (U f'); le_fun (U f') (U f) ⟧ ⟹ P (U (F f'))"
shows "P (U f)"
unfolding eq inverse
apply (rule ccpo.fixp_strong_induct[OF ccpo adm])
apply (insert mono, auto simp: monotone_def fun_ord_def bot fun_lub_def)[2]
apply (rule_tac f'5="C x" in step)
apply (simp_all add: inverse eq)
done
end
subsection ‹\<^term>‹(=)› as order›
definition lub_singleton :: "('a set ⇒ 'a) ⇒ bool"
where "lub_singleton lub ⟷ (∀a. lub {a} = a)"
definition the_Sup :: "'a set ⇒ 'a"
where "the_Sup A = (THE a. a ∈ A)"
lemma lub_singleton_the_Sup [cont_intro, simp]: "lub_singleton the_Sup"
by(simp add: lub_singleton_def the_Sup_def)
lemma (in ccpo) lub_singleton: "lub_singleton Sup"
by(simp add: lub_singleton_def)
lemma (in partial_function_definitions) lub_singleton [cont_intro, simp]: "lub_singleton lub"
by(rule ccpo.lub_singleton)(rule Partial_Function.ccpo[OF partial_function_definitions_axioms])
lemma preorder_eq [cont_intro, simp]:
"class.preorder (=) (mk_less (=))"
by(unfold_locales)(simp_all add: mk_less_def)
lemma monotone_eqI [cont_intro]:
assumes "class.preorder ord (mk_less ord)"
shows "monotone (=) ord f"
proof -
interpret preorder ord "mk_less ord" by fact
show ?thesis by(simp add: monotone_def)
qed
lemma cont_eqI [cont_intro]:
fixes f :: "'a ⇒ 'b"
assumes "lub_singleton lub"
shows "cont the_Sup (=) lub ord f"
proof(rule contI)
fix Y :: "'a set"
assume "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (=) Y" "Y ≠ {}"
then obtain a where "Y = {a}" by(auto simp add: chain_def)
thus "f (the_Sup Y) = lub (f ` Y)" using assms
by(simp add: the_Sup_def lub_singleton_def)
qed
lemma mcont_eqI [cont_intro, simp]:
"⟦ class.preorder ord (mk_less ord); lub_singleton lub ⟧
⟹ mcont the_Sup (=) lub ord f"
by(simp add: mcont_def cont_eqI monotone_eqI)
subsection ‹ccpo for products›
definition prod_lub :: "('a set ⇒ 'a) ⇒ ('b set ⇒ 'b) ⇒ ('a × 'b) set ⇒ 'a × 'b"
where "prod_lub Sup_a Sup_b Y = (Sup_a (fst ` Y), Sup_b (snd ` Y))"
lemma lub_singleton_prod_lub [cont_intro, simp]:
"⟦ lub_singleton luba; lub_singleton lubb ⟧ ⟹ lub_singleton (prod_lub luba lubb)"
by(simp add: lub_singleton_def prod_lub_def)
lemma prod_lub_empty [simp]: "prod_lub luba lubb {} = (luba {}, lubb {})"
by(simp add: prod_lub_def)
lemma preorder_rel_prodI [cont_intro, simp]:
assumes "class.preorder orda (mk_less orda)"
and "class.preorder ordb (mk_less ordb)"
shows "class.preorder (rel_prod orda ordb) (mk_less (rel_prod orda ordb))"
proof -
interpret a: preorder orda "mk_less orda" by fact
interpret b: preorder ordb "mk_less ordb" by fact
show ?thesis by(unfold_locales)(auto simp add: mk_less_def intro: a.order_trans b.order_trans)
qed
lemma order_rel_prodI:
assumes a: "class.order orda (mk_less orda)"
and b: "class.order ordb (mk_less ordb)"
shows "class.order (rel_prod orda ordb) (mk_less (rel_prod orda ordb))"
(is "class.order ?ord ?ord'")
proof(intro class.order.intro class.order_axioms.intro)
interpret a: order orda "mk_less orda" by(fact a)
interpret b: order ordb "mk_less ordb" by(fact b)
show "class.preorder ?ord ?ord'" by(rule preorder_rel_prodI) unfold_locales
fix x y
assume "?ord x y" "?ord y x"
thus "x = y" by(cases x y rule: prod.exhaust[case_product prod.exhaust]) auto
qed
lemma monotone_rel_prodI:
assumes mono2: "⋀a. monotone ordb ordc (λb. f (a, b))"
and mono1: "⋀b. monotone orda ordc (λa. f (a, b))"
and a: "class.preorder orda (mk_less orda)"
and b: "class.preorder ordb (mk_less ordb)"
and c: "class.preorder ordc (mk_less ordc)"
shows "monotone (rel_prod orda ordb) ordc f"
proof -
interpret a: preorder orda "mk_less orda" by(rule a)
interpret b: preorder ordb "mk_less ordb" by(rule b)
interpret c: preorder ordc "mk_less ordc" by(rule c)
show ?thesis using mono2 mono1
by(auto 7 2 simp add: monotone_def intro: c.order_trans)
qed
lemma monotone_rel_prodD1:
assumes mono: "monotone (rel_prod orda ordb) ordc f"
and preorder: "class.preorder ordb (mk_less ordb)"
shows "monotone orda ordc (λa. f (a, b))"
proof -
interpret preorder ordb "mk_less ordb" by(rule preorder)
show ?thesis using mono by(simp add: monotone_def)
qed
lemma monotone_rel_prodD2:
assumes mono: "monotone (rel_prod orda ordb) ordc f"
and preorder: "class.preorder orda (mk_less orda)"
shows "monotone ordb ordc (λb. f (a, b))"
proof -
interpret preorder orda "mk_less orda" by(rule preorder)
show ?thesis using mono by(simp add: monotone_def)
qed
lemma monotone_case_prodI:
"⟦ ⋀a. monotone ordb ordc (f a); ⋀b. monotone orda ordc (λa. f a b);
class.preorder orda (mk_less orda); class.preorder ordb (mk_less ordb);
class.preorder ordc (mk_less ordc) ⟧
⟹ monotone (rel_prod orda ordb) ordc (case_prod f)"
by(rule monotone_rel_prodI) simp_all
lemma monotone_case_prodD1:
assumes mono: "monotone (rel_prod orda ordb) ordc (case_prod f)"
and preorder: "class.preorder ordb (mk_less ordb)"
shows "monotone orda ordc (λa. f a b)"
using monotone_rel_prodD1[OF assms] by simp
lemma monotone_case_prodD2:
assumes mono: "monotone (rel_prod orda ordb) ordc (case_prod f)"
and preorder: "class.preorder orda (mk_less orda)"
shows "monotone ordb ordc (f a)"
using monotone_rel_prodD2[OF assms] by simp
context
fixes orda ordb ordc
assumes a: "class.preorder orda (mk_less orda)"
and b: "class.preorder ordb (mk_less ordb)"
and c: "class.preorder ordc (mk_less ordc)"
begin
lemma monotone_rel_prod_iff:
"monotone (rel_prod orda ordb) ordc f ⟷
(∀a. monotone ordb ordc (λb. f (a, b))) ∧
(∀b. monotone orda ordc (λa. f (a, b)))"
using a b c by(blast intro: monotone_rel_prodI dest: monotone_rel_prodD1 monotone_rel_prodD2)
lemma monotone_case_prod_iff [simp]:
"monotone (rel_prod orda ordb) ordc (case_prod f) ⟷
(∀a. monotone ordb ordc (f a)) ∧ (∀b. monotone orda ordc (λa. f a b))"
by(simp add: monotone_rel_prod_iff)
end
lemma monotone_case_prod_apply_iff:
"monotone orda ordb (λx. (case_prod f x) y) ⟷ monotone orda ordb (case_prod (λa b. f a b y))"
by(simp add: monotone_def)
lemma monotone_case_prod_applyD:
"monotone orda ordb (λx. (case_prod f x) y)
⟹ monotone orda ordb (case_prod (λa b. f a b y))"
by(simp add: monotone_case_prod_apply_iff)
lemma monotone_case_prod_applyI:
"monotone orda ordb (case_prod (λa b. f a b y))
⟹ monotone orda ordb (λx. (case_prod f x) y)"
by(simp add: monotone_case_prod_apply_iff)
lemma cont_case_prod_apply_iff:
"cont luba orda lubb ordb (λx. (case_prod f x) y) ⟷ cont luba orda lubb ordb (case_prod (λa b. f a b y))"
by(simp add: cont_def split_def)
lemma cont_case_prod_applyI:
"cont luba orda lubb ordb (case_prod (λa b. f a b y))
⟹ cont luba orda lubb ordb (λx. (case_prod f x) y)"
by(simp add: cont_case_prod_apply_iff)
lemma cont_case_prod_applyD:
"cont luba orda lubb ordb (λx. (case_prod f x) y)
⟹ cont luba orda lubb ordb (case_prod (λa b. f a b y))"
by(simp add: cont_case_prod_apply_iff)
lemma mcont_case_prod_apply_iff [simp]:
"mcont luba orda lubb ordb (λx. (case_prod f x) y) ⟷
mcont luba orda lubb ordb (case_prod (λa b. f a b y))"
by(simp add: mcont_def monotone_case_prod_apply_iff cont_case_prod_apply_iff)
lemma cont_prodD1:
assumes cont: "cont (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) lubc ordc f"
and "class.preorder orda (mk_less orda)"
and luba: "lub_singleton luba"
shows "cont lubb ordb lubc ordc (λy. f (x, y))"
proof(rule contI)
interpret preorder orda "mk_less orda" by fact
fix Y :: "'b set"
let ?Y = "{x} × Y"
assume "Complete_Partial_Order.chain ordb Y" "Y ≠ {}"
hence "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (rel_prod orda ordb) ?Y" "?Y ≠ {}"
by(simp_all add: chain_def)
with cont have "f (prod_lub luba lubb ?Y) = lubc (f ` ?Y)" by(rule contD)
moreover have "f ` ?Y = (λy. f (x, y)) ` Y" by auto
ultimately show "f (x, lubb Y) = lubc ((λy. f (x, y)) ` Y)" using luba
by(simp add: prod_lub_def ‹Y ≠ {}› lub_singleton_def)
qed
lemma cont_prodD2:
assumes cont: "cont (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) lubc ordc f"
and "class.preorder ordb (mk_less ordb)"
and lubb: "lub_singleton lubb"
shows "cont luba orda lubc ordc (λx. f (x, y))"
proof(rule contI)
interpret preorder ordb "mk_less ordb" by fact
fix Y
assume Y: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain orda Y" "Y ≠ {}"
let ?Y = "Y × {y}"
have "f (luba Y, y) = f (prod_lub luba lubb ?Y)"
using lubb by(simp add: prod_lub_def Y lub_singleton_def)
also from Y have "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (rel_prod orda ordb) ?Y" "?Y ≠ {}"
by(simp_all add: chain_def)
with cont have "f (prod_lub luba lubb ?Y) = lubc (f ` ?Y)" by(rule contD)
also have "f ` ?Y = (λx. f (x, y)) ` Y" by auto
finally show "f (luba Y, y) = lubc …" .
qed
lemma cont_case_prodD1:
assumes "cont (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) lubc ordc (case_prod f)"
and "class.preorder orda (mk_less orda)"
and "lub_singleton luba"
shows "cont lubb ordb lubc ordc (f x)"
using cont_prodD1[OF assms] by simp
lemma cont_case_prodD2:
assumes "cont (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) lubc ordc (case_prod f)"
and "class.preorder ordb (mk_less ordb)"
and "lub_singleton lubb"
shows "cont luba orda lubc ordc (λx. f x y)"
using cont_prodD2[OF assms] by simp
context ccpo begin
lemma cont_prodI:
assumes mono: "monotone (rel_prod orda ordb) (≤) f"
and cont1: "⋀x. cont lubb ordb Sup (≤) (λy. f (x, y))"
and cont2: "⋀y. cont luba orda Sup (≤) (λx. f (x, y))"
and "class.preorder orda (mk_less orda)"
and "class.preorder ordb (mk_less ordb)"
shows "cont (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) Sup (≤) f"
proof(rule contI)
interpret a: preorder orda "mk_less orda" by fact
interpret b: preorder ordb "mk_less ordb" by fact
fix Y
assume chain: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (rel_prod orda ordb) Y"
and "Y ≠ {}"
have "f (prod_lub luba lubb Y) = f (luba (fst ` Y), lubb (snd ` Y))"
by(simp add: prod_lub_def)
also from cont2 have "f (luba (fst ` Y), lubb (snd ` Y)) = ⨆((λx. f (x, lubb (snd ` Y))) ` fst ` Y)"
by(rule contD)(simp_all add: chain_rel_prodD1[OF chain] ‹Y ≠ {}›)
also from cont1 have "⋀x. f (x, lubb (snd ` Y)) = ⨆((λy. f (x, y)) ` snd ` Y)"
by(rule contD)(simp_all add: chain_rel_prodD2[OF chain] ‹Y ≠ {}›)
hence "⨆((λx. f (x, lubb (snd ` Y))) ` fst ` Y) = ⨆((λx. … x) ` fst ` Y)" by simp
also have "… = ⨆((λx. f (fst x, snd x)) ` Y)"
unfolding image_image split_def using chain
apply(rule diag_Sup)
using monotoneD[OF mono]
by(auto intro: monotoneI)
finally show "f (prod_lub luba lubb Y) = ⨆(f ` Y)" by simp
qed
lemma cont_case_prodI:
assumes "monotone (rel_prod orda ordb) (≤) (case_prod f)"
and "⋀x. cont lubb ordb Sup (≤) (λy. f x y)"
and "⋀y. cont luba orda Sup (≤) (λx. f x y)"
and "class.preorder orda (mk_less orda)"
and "class.preorder ordb (mk_less ordb)"
shows "cont (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) Sup (≤) (case_prod f)"
by(rule cont_prodI)(simp_all add: assms)
lemma cont_case_prod_iff:
"⟦ monotone (rel_prod orda ordb) (≤) (case_prod f);
class.preorder orda (mk_less orda); lub_singleton luba;
class.preorder ordb (mk_less ordb); lub_singleton lubb ⟧
⟹ cont (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) Sup (≤) (case_prod f) ⟷
(∀x. cont lubb ordb Sup (≤) (λy. f x y)) ∧ (∀y. cont luba orda Sup (≤) (λx. f x y))"
by(blast dest: cont_case_prodD1 cont_case_prodD2 intro: cont_case_prodI)
end
context partial_function_definitions begin
lemma mono2mono2:
assumes f: "monotone (rel_prod ordb ordc) leq (λ(x, y). f x y)"
and t: "monotone orda ordb (λx. t x)"
and t': "monotone orda ordc (λx. t' x)"
shows "monotone orda leq (λx. f (t x) (t' x))"
proof(rule monotoneI)
fix x y
assume "orda x y"
hence "rel_prod ordb ordc (t x, t' x) (t y, t' y)"
using t t' by(auto dest: monotoneD)
from monotoneD[OF f this] show "leq (f (t x) (t' x)) (f (t y) (t' y))" by simp
qed
lemma cont_case_prodI [cont_intro]:
"⟦ monotone (rel_prod orda ordb) leq (case_prod f);
⋀x. cont lubb ordb lub leq (λy. f x y);
⋀y. cont luba orda lub leq (λx. f x y);
class.preorder orda (mk_less orda);
class.preorder ordb (mk_less ordb) ⟧
⟹ cont (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) lub leq (case_prod f)"
by(rule ccpo.cont_case_prodI)(rule Partial_Function.ccpo[OF partial_function_definitions_axioms])
lemma cont_case_prod_iff:
"⟦ monotone (rel_prod orda ordb) leq (case_prod f);
class.preorder orda (mk_less orda); lub_singleton luba;
class.preorder ordb (mk_less ordb); lub_singleton lubb ⟧
⟹ cont (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) lub leq (case_prod f) ⟷
(∀x. cont lubb ordb lub leq (λy. f x y)) ∧ (∀y. cont luba orda lub leq (λx. f x y))"
by(blast dest: cont_case_prodD1 cont_case_prodD2 intro: cont_case_prodI)
lemma mcont_case_prod_iff [simp]:
"⟦ class.preorder orda (mk_less orda); lub_singleton luba;
class.preorder ordb (mk_less ordb); lub_singleton lubb ⟧
⟹ mcont (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) lub leq (case_prod f) ⟷
(∀x. mcont lubb ordb lub leq (λy. f x y)) ∧ (∀y. mcont luba orda lub leq (λx. f x y))"
unfolding mcont_def by(auto simp add: cont_case_prod_iff)
end
lemma mono2mono_case_prod [cont_intro]:
assumes "⋀x y. monotone orda ordb (λf. pair f x y)"
shows "monotone orda ordb (λf. case_prod (pair f) x)"
by(rule monotoneI)(auto split: prod.split dest: monotoneD[OF assms])
subsection ‹Complete lattices as ccpo›
context complete_lattice begin
lemma complete_lattice_ccpo: "class.ccpo Sup (≤) (<)"
by(unfold_locales)(fast intro: Sup_upper Sup_least)+
lemma complete_lattice_ccpo': "class.ccpo Sup (≤) (mk_less (≤))"
by(unfold_locales)(auto simp add: mk_less_def intro: Sup_upper Sup_least)
lemma complete_lattice_partial_function_definitions:
"partial_function_definitions (≤) Sup"
by(unfold_locales)(auto intro: Sup_least Sup_upper)
lemma complete_lattice_partial_function_definitions_dual:
"partial_function_definitions (≥) Inf"
by(unfold_locales)(auto intro: Inf_lower Inf_greatest)
lemmas [cont_intro, simp] =
Partial_Function.ccpo[OF complete_lattice_partial_function_definitions]
Partial_Function.ccpo[OF complete_lattice_partial_function_definitions_dual]
lemma mono2mono_inf:
assumes f: "monotone ord (≤) (λx. f x)"
and g: "monotone ord (≤) (λx. g x)"
shows "monotone ord (≤) (λx. f x ⊓ g x)"
by(auto 4 3 dest: monotoneD[OF f] monotoneD[OF g] intro: le_infI1 le_infI2 intro!: monotoneI)
lemma mcont_const [simp]: "mcont lub ord Sup (≤) (λ_. c)"
by(rule ccpo.mcont_const[OF complete_lattice_ccpo])
lemma mono2mono_sup:
assumes f: "monotone ord (≤) (λx. f x)"
and g: "monotone ord (≤) (λx. g x)"
shows "monotone ord (≤) (λx. f x ⊔ g x)"
by(auto 4 3 intro!: monotoneI intro: sup.coboundedI1 sup.coboundedI2 dest: monotoneD[OF f] monotoneD[OF g])
lemma Sup_image_sup:
assumes "Y ≠ {}"
shows "⨆((⊔) x ` Y) = x ⊔ ⨆Y"
proof(rule Sup_eqI)
fix y
assume "y ∈ (⊔) x ` Y"
then obtain z where "y = x ⊔ z" and "z ∈ Y" by blast
from ‹z ∈ Y› have "z ≤ ⨆Y" by(rule Sup_upper)
with _ show "y ≤ x ⊔ ⨆Y" unfolding ‹y = x ⊔ z› by(rule sup_mono) simp
next
fix y
assume upper: "⋀z. z ∈ (⊔) x ` Y ⟹ z ≤ y"
show "x ⊔ ⨆Y ≤ y" unfolding Sup_insert[symmetric]
proof(rule Sup_least)
fix z
assume "z ∈ insert x Y"
from assms obtain z' where "z' ∈ Y" by blast
let ?z = "if z ∈ Y then x ⊔ z else x ⊔ z'"
have "z ≤ x ⊔ ?z" using ‹z' ∈ Y› ‹z ∈ insert x Y› by auto
also have "… ≤ y" by(rule upper)(auto split: if_split_asm intro: ‹z' ∈ Y›)
finally show "z ≤ y" .
qed
qed
lemma mcont_sup1: "mcont Sup (≤) Sup (≤) (λy. x ⊔ y)"
by(auto 4 3 simp add: mcont_def sup.coboundedI1 sup.coboundedI2 intro!: monotoneI contI intro: Sup_image_sup[symmetric])
lemma mcont_sup2: "mcont Sup (≤) Sup (≤) (λx. x ⊔ y)"
by(subst sup_commute)(rule mcont_sup1)
lemma mcont2mcont_sup [cont_intro, simp]:
"⟦ mcont lub ord Sup (≤) (λx. f x);
mcont lub ord Sup (≤) (λx. g x) ⟧
⟹ mcont lub ord Sup (≤) (λx. f x ⊔ g x)"
by(best intro: ccpo.mcont2mcont'[OF complete_lattice_ccpo] mcont_sup1 mcont_sup2 ccpo.mcont_const[OF complete_lattice_ccpo])
end
lemmas [cont_intro] = admissible_leI[OF complete_lattice_ccpo']
context complete_distrib_lattice begin
lemma mcont_inf1: "mcont Sup (≤) Sup (≤) (λy. x ⊓ y)"
by(auto intro: monotoneI contI simp add: le_infI2 inf_Sup mcont_def)
lemma mcont_inf2: "mcont Sup (≤) Sup (≤) (λx. x ⊓ y)"
by(auto intro: monotoneI contI simp add: le_infI1 Sup_inf mcont_def)
lemma mcont2mcont_inf [cont_intro, simp]:
"⟦ mcont lub ord Sup (≤) (λx. f x);
mcont lub ord Sup (≤) (λx. g x) ⟧
⟹ mcont lub ord Sup (≤) (λx. f x ⊓ g x)"
by(best intro: ccpo.mcont2mcont'[OF complete_lattice_ccpo] mcont_inf1 mcont_inf2 ccpo.mcont_const[OF complete_lattice_ccpo])
end
interpretation lfp: partial_function_definitions "(≤) :: _ :: complete_lattice ⇒ _" Sup
by(rule complete_lattice_partial_function_definitions)
declaration ‹Partial_Function.init "lfp" \<^term>‹lfp.fixp_fun› \<^term>‹lfp.mono_body›
@{thm lfp.fixp_rule_uc} @{thm lfp.fixp_induct_uc} NONE›
interpretation gfp: partial_function_definitions "(≥) :: _ :: complete_lattice ⇒ _" Inf
by(rule complete_lattice_partial_function_definitions_dual)
declaration ‹Partial_Function.init "gfp" \<^term>‹gfp.fixp_fun› \<^term>‹gfp.mono_body›
@{thm gfp.fixp_rule_uc} @{thm gfp.fixp_induct_uc} NONE›
lemma insert_mono [partial_function_mono]:
"monotone (fun_ord (⊆)) (⊆) A ⟹ monotone (fun_ord (⊆)) (⊆) (λy. insert x (A y))"
by(rule monotoneI)(auto simp add: fun_ord_def dest: monotoneD)
lemma mono2mono_insert [THEN lfp.mono2mono, cont_intro, simp]:
shows monotone_insert: "monotone (⊆) (⊆) (insert x)"
by(rule monotoneI) blast
lemma mcont2mcont_insert[THEN lfp.mcont2mcont, cont_intro, simp]:
shows mcont_insert: "mcont Union (⊆) Union (⊆) (insert x)"
by(blast intro: mcontI contI monotone_insert)
lemma mono2mono_image [THEN lfp.mono2mono, cont_intro, simp]:
shows monotone_image: "monotone (⊆) (⊆) ((`) f)"
by(rule monotoneI) blast
lemma cont_image: "cont Union (⊆) Union (⊆) ((`) f)"
by(rule contI)(auto)
lemma mcont2mcont_image [THEN lfp.mcont2mcont, cont_intro, simp]:
shows mcont_image: "mcont Union (⊆) Union (⊆) ((`) f)"
by(blast intro: mcontI monotone_image cont_image)
context complete_lattice begin
lemma monotone_Sup [cont_intro, simp]:
"monotone ord (⊆) f ⟹ monotone ord (≤) (λx. ⨆f x)"
by(blast intro: monotoneI Sup_least Sup_upper dest: monotoneD)
lemma cont_Sup:
assumes "cont lub ord Union (⊆) f"
shows "cont lub ord Sup (≤) (λx. ⨆f x)"
apply(rule contI)
apply(simp add: contD[OF assms])
apply(blast intro: Sup_least Sup_upper order_trans order.antisym)
done
lemma mcont_Sup: "mcont lub ord Union (⊆) f ⟹ mcont lub ord Sup (≤) (λx. ⨆f x)"
unfolding mcont_def by(blast intro: monotone_Sup cont_Sup)
lemma monotone_SUP:
"⟦ monotone ord (⊆) f; ⋀y. monotone ord (≤) (λx. g x y) ⟧ ⟹ monotone ord (≤) (λx. ⨆y∈f x. g x y)"
by(rule monotoneI)(blast dest: monotoneD intro: Sup_upper order_trans intro!: Sup_least)
lemma monotone_SUP2:
"(⋀y. y ∈ A ⟹ monotone ord (≤) (λx. g x y)) ⟹ monotone ord (≤) (λx. ⨆y∈A. g x y)"
by(rule monotoneI)(blast intro: Sup_upper order_trans dest: monotoneD intro!: Sup_least)
lemma cont_SUP:
assumes f: "mcont lub ord Union (⊆) f"
and g: "⋀y. mcont lub ord Sup (≤) (λx. g x y)"
shows "cont lub ord Sup (≤) (λx. ⨆y∈f x. g x y)"
proof(rule contI)
fix Y
assume chain: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain ord Y"
and Y: "Y ≠ {}"
show "⨆(g (lub Y) ` f (lub Y)) = ⨆((λx. ⨆(g x ` f x)) ` Y)" (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof(rule order.antisym)
show "?lhs ≤ ?rhs"
proof(rule Sup_least)
fix x
assume "x ∈ g (lub Y) ` f (lub Y)"
with mcont_contD[OF f chain Y] mcont_contD[OF g chain Y]
obtain y z where "y ∈ Y" "z ∈ f y"
and x: "x = ⨆((λx. g x z) ` Y)" by auto
show "x ≤ ?rhs" unfolding x
proof(rule Sup_least)
fix u
assume "u ∈ (λx. g x z) ` Y"
then obtain y' where "u = g y' z" "y' ∈ Y" by auto
from chain ‹y ∈ Y› ‹y' ∈ Y› have "ord y y' ∨ ord y' y" by(rule chainD)
thus "u ≤ ?rhs"
proof
note ‹u = g y' z› also
assume "ord y y'"
with f have "f y ⊆ f y'" by(rule mcont_monoD)
with ‹z ∈ f y›
have "g y' z ≤ ⨆(g y' ` f y')" by(auto intro: Sup_upper)
also have "… ≤ ?rhs" using ‹y' ∈ Y› by(auto intro: Sup_upper)
finally show ?thesis .
next
note ‹u = g y' z› also
assume "ord y' y"
with g have "g y' z ≤ g y z" by(rule mcont_monoD)
also have "… ≤ ⨆(g y ` f y)" using ‹z ∈ f y›
by(auto intro: Sup_upper)
also have "… ≤ ?rhs" using ‹y ∈ Y› by(auto intro: Sup_upper)
finally show ?thesis .
qed
qed
qed
next
show "?rhs ≤ ?lhs"
proof(rule Sup_least)
fix x
assume "x ∈ (λx. ⨆(g x ` f x)) ` Y"
then obtain y where x: "x = ⨆(g y ` f y)" and "y ∈ Y" by auto
show "x ≤ ?lhs" unfolding x
proof(rule Sup_least)
fix u
assume "u ∈ g y ` f y"
then obtain z where "u = g y z" "z ∈ f y" by auto
note ‹u = g y z›
also have "g y z ≤ ⨆((λx. g x z) ` Y)"
using ‹y ∈ Y› by(auto intro: Sup_upper)
also have "… = g (lub Y) z" by(simp add: mcont_contD[OF g chain Y])
also have "… ≤ ?lhs" using ‹z ∈ f y› ‹y ∈ Y›
by(auto intro: Sup_upper simp add: mcont_contD[OF f chain Y])
finally show "u ≤ ?lhs" .
qed
qed
qed
qed
lemma mcont_SUP [cont_intro, simp]:
"⟦ mcont lub ord Union (⊆) f; ⋀y. mcont lub ord Sup (≤) (λx. g x y) ⟧
⟹ mcont lub ord Sup (≤) (λx. ⨆y∈f x. g x y)"
by(blast intro: mcontI cont_SUP monotone_SUP mcont_mono)
end
lemma admissible_Ball [cont_intro, simp]:
"⟦ ⋀x. ccpo.admissible lub ord (λA. P A x);
mcont lub ord Union (⊆) f;
class.ccpo lub ord (mk_less ord) ⟧
⟹ ccpo.admissible lub ord (λA. ∀x∈f A. P A x)"
unfolding Ball_def by simp
lemma admissible_Bex'[THEN admissible_subst, cont_intro, simp]:
shows admissible_Bex: "ccpo.admissible Union (⊆) (λA. ∃x∈A. P x)"
by(rule ccpo.admissibleI)(auto)
subsection ‹Parallel fixpoint induction›
context
fixes luba :: "'a set ⇒ 'a"
and orda :: "'a ⇒ 'a ⇒ bool"
and lubb :: "'b set ⇒ 'b"
and ordb :: "'b ⇒ 'b ⇒ bool"
assumes a: "class.ccpo luba orda (mk_less orda)"
and b: "class.ccpo lubb ordb (mk_less ordb)"
begin
interpretation a: ccpo luba orda "mk_less orda" by(rule a)
interpretation b: ccpo lubb ordb "mk_less ordb" by(rule b)
lemma ccpo_rel_prodI:
"class.ccpo (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) (mk_less (rel_prod orda ordb))"
(is "class.ccpo ?lub ?ord ?ord'")
proof(intro class.ccpo.intro class.ccpo_axioms.intro)
show "class.order ?ord ?ord'" by(rule order_rel_prodI) intro_locales
qed(auto 4 4 simp add: prod_lub_def intro: a.ccpo_Sup_upper b.ccpo_Sup_upper a.ccpo_Sup_least b.ccpo_Sup_least rev_image_eqI dest: chain_rel_prodD1 chain_rel_prodD2)
interpretation ab: ccpo "prod_lub luba lubb" "rel_prod orda ordb" "mk_less (rel_prod orda ordb)"
by(rule ccpo_rel_prodI)
lemma monotone_map_prod [simp]:
"monotone (rel_prod orda ordb) (rel_prod ordc ordd) (map_prod f g) ⟷
monotone orda ordc f ∧ monotone ordb ordd g"
by(auto simp add: monotone_def)
lemma parallel_fixp_induct:
assumes adm: "ccpo.admissible (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) (λx. P (fst x) (snd x))"
and f: "monotone orda orda f"
and g: "monotone ordb ordb g"
and bot: "P (luba {}) (lubb {})"
and step: "⋀x y. P x y ⟹ P (f x) (g y)"
shows "P (ccpo.fixp luba orda f) (ccpo.fixp lubb ordb g)"
proof -
let ?lub = "prod_lub luba lubb"
and ?ord = "rel_prod orda ordb"
and ?P = "λ(x, y). P x y"
from adm have adm': "ccpo.admissible ?lub ?ord ?P" by(simp add: split_def)
hence "?P (ccpo.fixp (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) (map_prod f g))"
by(rule ab.fixp_induct)(auto simp add: f g step bot)
also have "ccpo.fixp (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) (map_prod f g) =
(ccpo.fixp luba orda f, ccpo.fixp lubb ordb g)" (is "?lhs = (?rhs1, ?rhs2)")
proof(rule ab.order.antisym)
have "ccpo.admissible ?lub ?ord (λxy. ?ord xy (?rhs1, ?rhs2))"
by(rule admissible_leI[OF ccpo_rel_prodI])(auto simp add: prod_lub_def chain_empty intro: a.ccpo_Sup_least b.ccpo_Sup_least)
thus "?ord ?lhs (?rhs1, ?rhs2)"
by(rule ab.fixp_induct)(auto 4 3 dest: monotoneD[OF f] monotoneD[OF g] simp add: b.fixp_unfold[OF g, symmetric] a.fixp_unfold[OF f, symmetric] f g intro: a.ccpo_Sup_least b.ccpo_Sup_least chain_empty)
next
have "ccpo.admissible luba orda (λx. orda x (fst ?lhs))"
by(rule admissible_leI[OF a])(auto intro: a.ccpo_Sup_least simp add: chain_empty)
hence "orda ?rhs1 (fst ?lhs)" using f
proof(rule a.fixp_induct)
fix x
assume "orda x (fst ?lhs)"
thus "orda (f x) (fst ?lhs)"
by(subst ab.fixp_unfold)(auto simp add: f g dest: monotoneD[OF f])
qed(auto intro: a.ccpo_Sup_least chain_empty)
moreover
have "ccpo.admissible lubb ordb (λy. ordb y (snd ?lhs))"
by(rule admissible_leI[OF b])(auto intro: b.ccpo_Sup_least simp add: chain_empty)
hence "ordb ?rhs2 (snd ?lhs)" using g
proof(rule b.fixp_induct)
fix y
assume "ordb y (snd ?lhs)"
thus "ordb (g y) (snd ?lhs)"
by(subst ab.fixp_unfold)(auto simp add: f g dest: monotoneD[OF g])
qed(auto intro: b.ccpo_Sup_least chain_empty)
ultimately show "?ord (?rhs1, ?rhs2) ?lhs"
by(simp add: rel_prod_conv split_beta)
qed
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
end
lemma parallel_fixp_induct_uc:
assumes a: "partial_function_definitions orda luba"
and b: "partial_function_definitions ordb lubb"
and F: "⋀x. monotone (fun_ord orda) orda (λf. U1 (F (C1 f)) x)"
and G: "⋀y. monotone (fun_ord ordb) ordb (λg. U2 (G (C2 g)) y)"
and eq1: "f ≡ C1 (ccpo.fixp (fun_lub luba) (fun_ord orda) (λf. U1 (F (C1 f))))"
and eq2: "g ≡ C2 (ccpo.fixp (fun_lub lubb) (fun_ord ordb) (λg. U2 (G (C2 g))))"
and inverse: "⋀f. U1 (C1 f) = f"
and inverse2: "⋀g. U2 (C2 g) = g"
and adm: "ccpo.admissible (prod_lub (fun_lub luba) (fun_lub lubb)) (rel_prod (fun_ord orda) (fun_ord ordb)) (λx. P (fst x) (snd x))"
and bot: "P (λ_. luba {}) (λ_. lubb {})"
and step: "⋀f g. P (U1 f) (U2 g) ⟹ P (U1 (F f)) (U2 (G g))"
shows "P (U1 f) (U2 g)"
apply(unfold eq1 eq2 inverse inverse2)
apply(rule parallel_fixp_induct[OF partial_function_definitions.ccpo[OF a] partial_function_definitions.ccpo[OF b] adm])
using F apply(simp add: monotone_def fun_ord_def)
using G apply(simp add: monotone_def fun_ord_def)
apply(simp add: fun_lub_def bot)
apply(rule step, simp add: inverse inverse2)
done
lemmas parallel_fixp_induct_1_1 = parallel_fixp_induct_uc[
of _ _ _ _ "λx. x" _ "λx. x" "λx. x" _ "λx. x",
OF _ _ _ _ _ _ refl refl]
lemmas parallel_fixp_induct_2_2 = parallel_fixp_induct_uc[
of _ _ _ _ "case_prod" _ "curry" "case_prod" _ "curry",
where P="λf g. P (curry f) (curry g)",
unfolded case_prod_curry curry_case_prod curry_K,
OF _ _ _ _ _ _ refl refl]
for P
lemma monotone_fst: "monotone (rel_prod orda ordb) orda fst"
by(auto intro: monotoneI)
lemma mcont_fst: "mcont (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) luba orda fst"
by(auto intro!: mcontI monotoneI contI simp add: prod_lub_def)
lemma mcont2mcont_fst [cont_intro, simp]:
"mcont lub ord (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) t
⟹ mcont lub ord luba orda (λx. fst (t x))"
by(auto intro!: mcontI monotoneI contI dest: mcont_monoD mcont_contD simp add: rel_prod_sel split_beta prod_lub_def image_image)
lemma monotone_snd: "monotone (rel_prod orda ordb) ordb snd"
by(auto intro: monotoneI)
lemma mcont_snd: "mcont (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) lubb ordb snd"
by(auto intro!: mcontI monotoneI contI simp add: prod_lub_def)
lemma mcont2mcont_snd [cont_intro, simp]:
"mcont lub ord (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) t
⟹ mcont lub ord lubb ordb (λx. snd (t x))"
by(auto intro!: mcontI monotoneI contI dest: mcont_monoD mcont_contD simp add: rel_prod_sel split_beta prod_lub_def image_image)
lemma monotone_Pair:
"⟦ monotone ord orda f; monotone ord ordb g ⟧
⟹ monotone ord (rel_prod orda ordb) (λx. (f x, g x))"
by(simp add: monotone_def)
lemma cont_Pair:
"⟦ cont lub ord luba orda f; cont lub ord lubb ordb g ⟧
⟹ cont lub ord (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) (λx. (f x, g x))"
by(rule contI)(auto simp add: prod_lub_def image_image dest!: contD)
lemma mcont_Pair:
"⟦ mcont lub ord luba orda f; mcont lub ord lubb ordb g ⟧
⟹ mcont lub ord (prod_lub luba lubb) (rel_prod orda ordb) (λx. (f x, g x))"
by(rule mcontI)(simp_all add: monotone_Pair mcont_mono cont_Pair)
context partial_function_definitions begin
text ‹Specialised versions of @{thm [source] mcont_call} for admissibility proofs for parallel fixpoint inductions›
lemmas mcont_call_fst [cont_intro] = mcont_call[THEN mcont2mcont, OF mcont_fst]
lemmas mcont_call_snd [cont_intro] = mcont_call[THEN mcont2mcont, OF mcont_snd]
end
lemma map_option_mono [partial_function_mono]:
"mono_option B ⟹ mono_option (λf. map_option g (B f))"
unfolding map_conv_bind_option by(rule bind_mono) simp_all
lemma compact_flat_lub [cont_intro]: "ccpo.compact (flat_lub x) (flat_ord x) y"
using flat_interpretation[THEN ccpo]
proof(rule ccpo.compactI[OF _ ccpo.admissibleI])
fix A
assume chain: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain (flat_ord x) A"
and A: "A ≠ {}"
and *: "∀z∈A. ¬ flat_ord x y z"
from A obtain z where "z ∈ A" by blast
with * have z: "¬ flat_ord x y z" ..
hence y: "x ≠ y" "y ≠ z" by(auto simp add: flat_ord_def)
have "y ≠ (THE z. z ∈ A - {x})" if "¬ A ⊆ {x}"
proof -
from that obtain z' where "z' ∈ A" "z' ≠ x" by auto
then have "(THE z. z ∈ A - {x}) = z'"
by(intro the_equality)(auto dest: chainD[OF chain] simp add: flat_ord_def)
moreover have "z' ≠ y" using ‹z' ∈ A› * by(auto simp add: flat_ord_def)
ultimately show ?thesis by simp
qed
with z show "¬ flat_ord x y (flat_lub x A)" by(simp add: flat_ord_def flat_lub_def)
qed
end