Theory Simple_TBOUND_Cond
theory Simple_TBOUND_Cond
imports Time_Reasoning
begin
text ‹This entry stops at showing the correctness and complexity of the operations,
but does not provide a complete or universally usable methods to reason about
programs using these operations.
In this theory, we provide an ad-hoc method, which is showcased
with a simple example later on.
›
text ‹definition of conditional TBOUND relation and setup›
definition cond_TBOUND::"assn ⇒ 'a Heap ⇒ nat⇒ bool"(‹§ _ §/ TBOUND/ _ _›) where
"cond_TBOUND P c t ≡ (∀h as. (h,as) ⊨ P ⟶ time c h ≤ t)"
named_theorems cond_TBOUND
lemma htt_elim:
assumes "<P> c <Q>T[b]"
shows "§P§ TBOUND c b"
using assms
unfolding htt_def cond_TBOUND_def by simp
lemma htt_intro:
assumes "<P> c <Q>"
and "§P§ TBOUND c b"
shows "<P> c <Q> T[b]"
using assms unfolding htt_def cond_TBOUND_def by simp
lemma cond_TBOUND_mono: "§P§ TBOUND c b ⟹ b ≤ b' ⟹ §P§ TBOUND c b'"
unfolding cond_TBOUND_def by auto
lemma time_leq_bindy: "time c h ≤ t1 ⟹ time (d (the_res c h)) (the_heap c h) ≤ t2 ⟹
time (c ⤜ d) h ≤ t1+t2"
by (simp add: time_bind)
lemma cond_TBOUND_bind[cond_TBOUND]:
assumes "§P§ TBOUND c t1"
and "<P> c <Q>"
and "(⋀ x h. x = the_res c h ⟹ §Q x§ TBOUND (d x) t2)"
shows "§P§ TBOUND (c ⤜ d) (t1+t2)"
unfolding cond_TBOUND_def hoare_triple_def
apply auto
subgoal for h as
apply(cases "fails (d (the_res c h)) (the_heap c h)")
apply (simp add: time_bind)
apply(rule time_leq_bindy)
subgoal
using assms unfolding cond_TBOUND_def hoare_triple_def
apply auto
done
using assms(3)[of "(the_res c h)" h]
unfolding cond_TBOUND_def
using assms(2)
unfolding hoare_triple_def Let_def the_res_def the_heap_def
apply(auto split: option.split)
apply force+
done
done
lemma cond_TBOUND_return[cond_TBOUND]: "§ P § TBOUND (return x) 1"
by (simp add: cond_TBOUND_def time_return)
lemma cond_TBOUND_cons:
assumes "P ⟹⇩A Q"
and "§ Q § TBOUND c b"
shows "§ P § TBOUND c b"
using assms
unfolding cond_TBOUND_def
apply sep_auto
by (meson entailsD)
method cond_TBOUND= (rule cond_TBOUND_mono, rule cond_TBOUND)
end