Theory Transport_Functions_Galois_Relator

✐‹creator "Kevin Kappelmann"›
subsection ‹Galois Relator›
theory Transport_Functions_Galois_Relator
  imports
    Transport_Functions_Relation_Simplifications
begin

paragraph ‹Dependent Function Relator›

context transport_Dep_Fun_Rel
begin

interpretation flip : transport_Dep_Fun_Rel R1 L1 r1 l1 R2 L2 r2 l2
  rewrites "flip.t1.counit  η1" by (simp only: t1.flip_counit_eq_unit)

lemma Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_left_GaloisI:
  assumes "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and refl_L1: "reflexive_on (in_dom (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and mono_r2: "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x x')"
  and L2_le2: "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  (≤⇘L2 x1 x1)  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and ge_L2_r2_le2: "x x' y'. x L1x'  in_dom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x') y' 
    (≥⇘L2 x (r1 x')) (r2⇘x (l1 x)y')  (≥⇘L2 x (r1 x')) (r2⇘x x'y')"
  and trans_L2: "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "gR g"
  and "f Lg"
  shows "((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
proof (intro Dep_Fun_Rel_relI)
  fix x x' assume "x L1x'"
  show "f x ⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅ g x'"
  proof (intro t2.left_GaloisI)
    from x L1x' ((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1 have "xL1 r1 x'" "l1 xR1 x'" by auto
    with gR g have "g (l1 x) ≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x'g x'" by blast
    then show "in_codom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x') (g x')" by blast

    from f Lg have "fL r g" by blast
    moreover from refl_L1 x L1x' have "xL1 x" by blast
    ultimately have "f x ≤⇘L2 x x(r g) x" by blast
    with L2_le2 xL1 r1 x' have "f x ≤⇘L2 x (r1 x')(r g) x" by blast
    then have "f x ≤⇘L2 x (r1 x')⇙ r2⇘x (l1 x)(g (l1 x))" by simp
    with ge_L2_r2_le2 have "f x ≤⇘L2 x (r1 x')⇙ r2⇘x x'(g (l1 x))"
      using x L1x' g (l1 x) ≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x'_ by blast
    moreover have "... ≤⇘L2 x (r1 x')⇙ r2⇘x x'(g x')"
      using mono_r2 x L1x' g (l1 x) ≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x'g x' by blast
    ultimately show "f x ≤⇘L2 x (r1 x')⇙ r2⇘x x'(g x')"
      using trans_L2 x L1x' by blast
  qed
qed

lemma left_rel_right_if_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI:
  assumes mono_l1: "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1"
  and half_galois_prop_right1: "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and L2_unit_le2: "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  (≤⇘L2 x1 (η1 x2))  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and ge_L2_r2_le1: "x1 x2 y'. x1L1 x2  in_codom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) (l1 x2)) y' 
    (≥⇘L2 x1 x2) (r2⇘x1 (l1 x2)y')  (≥⇘L2 x1 x2) (r2⇘x2 (l1 x2)y')"
  and rel_f_g: "((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
  shows "fL r g"
proof (intro left_relI)
  fix x1 x2 assume "x1L1 x2"
  with mono_l1 half_galois_prop_right1 have "x1 L1l1 x2"
    by (intro t1.left_Galois_left_if_left_relI) auto
  with rel_f_g have "f x1 ⇘L2 x1 (l1 x2)⇙⪅ g (l1 x2)" by blast
  then have "in_codom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) (l1 x2)) (g (l1 x2))"
    "f x1 ≤⇘L2 x1 (η1 x2)⇙ r2⇘x1 (l1 x2)(g (l1 x2))" by auto
  with L2_unit_le2 x1L1 x2 have "f x1 ≤⇘L2 x1 x2⇙ r2⇘x1 (l1 x2)(g (l1 x2))" by blast
  with ge_L2_r2_le1 x1L1 x2 in_codom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) (l1 x2)) (g (l1 x2))
    have "f x1 ≤⇘L2 x1 x2⇙ r2⇘x2 (l1 x2)(g (l1 x2))" by blast
  then show "f x1 ≤⇘L2 x1 x2r g x2" by simp
qed

lemma left_Galois_if_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI:
  assumes "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1"
  and "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  (≤⇘L2 x1 (η1 x2))  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "x1 x2 y'. x1L1 x2  in_codom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) (l1 x2)) y' 
    (≥⇘L2 x1 x2) (r2⇘x1 (l1 x2)y')  (≥⇘L2 x1 x2) (r2⇘x2 (l1 x2)y')"
  and "in_codom (≤R) g"
  and "((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
  shows "f Lg"
  using assms by (intro left_GaloisI left_rel_right_if_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI) auto

lemma left_right_rel_if_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI:
  assumes mono_r1: "((≤R1)  (≤L1)) r1"
  and half_galois_prop_left2: "x1' x2'. x1'R1 x2' 
    ((≤⇘L2 (r1 x1') (r1 x2')) h (≤⇘R2 (ε1 x1') x2')) (l2⇘x2' (r1 x1')) (r2⇘(r1 x1') x2')"
  and R2_le1: "x1' x2'. x1'R1 x2'  (≤⇘R2 (ε1 x1') x2')  (≤⇘R2 x1' x2')"
  and R2_l2_le1: "x1' x2' y. x1'R1 x2'  in_dom (≤⇘L2 (r1 x1') (r1 x2')) y 
    (≤⇘R2 x1' x2') (l2⇘x2' (r1 x1')y)  (≤⇘R2 x1' x2') (l2⇘x1' (r1 x1')y)"
  and rel_f_g: "((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
  shows "l fR g"
proof (rule flip.left_relI)
  fix x1' x2' assume "x1'R1 x2'"
  with mono_r1 have "r1 x1' L1x2'" by blast
  with rel_f_g have "f (r1 x1') ⇘L2 (r1 x1') x2'⇙⪅ g x2'" by blast
  with half_galois_prop_left2[OF x1'R1 x2']
    have "l2⇘x2' (r1 x1')(f (r1 x1')) ≤⇘R2 (ε1 x1') x2'g x2'" by auto
  with R2_le1 x1'R1 x2' have "l2⇘x2' (r1 x1')(f (r1 x1')) ≤⇘R2 x1' x2'g x2'"
    by blast
  with R2_l2_le1 x1'R1 x2' f (r1 x1') ⇘L2 (r1 x1') x2'⇙⪅ _
    have "l2⇘x1' (r1 x1')(f (r1 x1')) ≤⇘R2 x1' x2'g x2'" by blast
  then show "l f x1' ≤⇘R2 x1' x2'g x2'" by simp
qed

lemma left_Galois_if_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI':
  assumes "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1" and "((≤R1)  (≤L1)) r1"
  and "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "x1' x2'. x1'R1 x2' 
    ((≤⇘L2 (r1 x1') (r1 x2')) h (≤⇘R2 (ε1 x1') x2')) (l2⇘x2' (r1 x1')) (r2⇘(r1 x1') x2')"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  (≤⇘L2 x1 (η1 x2))  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "x1' x2'. x1'R1 x2'  (≤⇘R2 (ε1 x1') x2')  (≤⇘R2 x1' x2')"
  and "x1 x2 y'. x1L1 x2  in_codom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) (l1 x2)) y' 
    (≥⇘L2 x1 x2) (r2⇘x1 (l1 x2)y')  (≥⇘L2 x1 x2) (r2⇘x2 (l1 x2)y')"
  and "x1' x2' y. x1'R1 x2'  in_dom (≤⇘L2 (r1 x1') (r1 x2')) y 
    (≤⇘R2 x1' x2') (l2⇘x2' (r1 x1')y)  (≤⇘R2 x1' x2') (l2⇘x1' (r1 x1')y)"
  and "((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
  shows "f Lg"
  using assms by (intro left_Galois_if_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI in_codomI[where ?x="l f"])
  (auto intro!: left_right_rel_if_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI)

lemma left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI:
  assumes "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1"
  and "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_dom (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  (≤⇘L2 x1 x1)  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  (≤⇘L2 x1 (η1 x2))  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "x1 x2 y'. x1L1 x2  in_codom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) (l1 x2)) y' 
    (≥⇘L2 x1 x2) (r2⇘x1 (l1 x2)y')  (≥⇘L2 x1 x2) (r2⇘x2 (l1 x2)y')"
  and "x x' y'. x L1x'  in_dom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x') y' 
    (≥⇘L2 x (r1 x')) (r2⇘x (l1 x)y')  (≥⇘L2 x (r1 x')) (r2⇘x x'y')"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "gR g"
  shows "f Lg  ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
  using assms by (intro iffI)
  (auto intro!: Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_left_GaloisI left_Galois_if_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI)

lemma left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_ge_left_rel2_assmI:
  assumes "x1 x2. x1L1 x2 
    ((in_codom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) (l1 x2)))  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)) (r2⇘x1 (l1 x2)) (r2⇘x2 (l1 x2))"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  shows "x1 x2 y'. x1L1 x2  in_codom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) (l1 x2)) y' 
    (≥⇘L2 x1 x2) (r2⇘x1 (l1 x2)y')  (≥⇘L2 x1 x2) (r2⇘x2 (l1 x2)y')"
  using assms by blast

lemma left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_ge_left_rel2_assmI':
  assumes "x x'. x L1x' 
    ((in_dom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x'))  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x (l1 x)) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  shows "x x' y'. x L1x'  in_dom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x') y' 
    (≥⇘L2 x (r1 x')) (r2⇘x (l1 x)y')  (≥⇘L2 x (r1 x')) (r2⇘x x'y')"
  using assms by blast

lemma left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_mono_assm_in_codom_rightI:
  assumes mono_l1: "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1"
  and half_galois_prop_right1: "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and refl_L1: "reflexive_on (in_codom (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and L2_le_unit2: "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  (≤⇘L2 x1 (η1 x2))  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and mono_r2: "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "x1L1 x2"
  shows "((in_codom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) (l1 x2)))  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)) (r2⇘x1 (l1 x2)) (r2⇘x2 (l1 x2))"
proof (intro Fun_Rel_predI)
  from mono_l1 half_galois_prop_right1 refl_L1 x1L1 x2
  have "l1 x2R1 l1 x2" "x2 L1l1 x2"
    by (blast intro: t1.left_Galois_left_if_left_relI)+
  fix y' assume "in_codom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) (l1 x2)) y'"
  with Dep_Fun_Rel_relD[OF
    dep_mono_wrt_relD[OF mono_r2 x1L1 x2] l1 x2R1 l1 x2]
    have "r2⇘x1 (l1 x2)y' ≤⇘L2 x1 (η1 x2)⇙ r2⇘x2 (l1 x2)y'"
    using x2 L1l1 x2 by (auto dest: in_field_if_in_codom)
  with L2_le_unit2 x1L1 x2 show "r2⇘x1 (l1 x2)y' ≤⇘L2 x1 x2⇙ r2⇘x2 (l1 x2)y'"
    by blast
qed

lemma left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_mono_assm_in_dom_rightI:
  assumes mono_l1: "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1"
  and half_galois_prop_right1: "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and refl_L1: "reflexive_on (in_dom (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and mono_r2: "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "x L1x'"
  shows "((in_dom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x'))  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x (l1 x)) (r2⇘x x')"
proof -
  from mono_l1 half_galois_prop_right1 refl_L1 x L1x'
    have "xL1 x" "l1 xR1 x'" "x L1l1 x"
    by (auto intro!: t1.half_galois_prop_leftD t1.left_Galois_left_if_left_relI)
  with Dep_Fun_Rel_relD[OF dep_mono_wrt_relD[OF mono_r2 xL1 x] l1 xR1 x']
    show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_monoI:
  assumes "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1"
  and "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_field (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  (≤⇘L2 x1 x1)  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  (≤⇘L2 x1 (η1 x2))  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "gR g"
  shows "f Lg  ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
  using assms by (intro left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI
    left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_ge_left_rel2_assmI
    left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_ge_left_rel2_assmI'
    left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_mono_assm_in_dom_rightI
    left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_mono_assm_in_codom_rightI)
  (auto intro: reflexive_on_if_le_pred_if_reflexive_on in_field_if_in_dom
    in_field_if_in_codom)

lemma left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_left_rel2_le_assmI:
  assumes refl_L1: "reflexive_on (in_dom (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and mono_L2: "((x1 : )  (x2 _  (≤L1) | x1L1 x2)  (≤)) L2"
  and "x1L1 x2"
  shows "(≤⇘L2 x1 x1)  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
proof -
  from refl_L1 x1L1 x2 have "x1L1 x1" by blast
  with dep_mono_wrt_relD[OF dep_mono_wrt_predD[OF mono_L2] x1L1 x2]
    show "(≤⇘L2 x1 x1)  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)" by auto
qed

lemma left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_left_rel2_unit1_le_assmI:
  assumes mono_l1: "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1"
  and half_galois_prop_right1: "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and refl_L1: "reflexive_on (in_codom (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and antimono_L2:
    "((x1 : )  (x2 x3  (≤L1) | (x1L1 x2  x3L1 η1 x2))  (≥)) L2"
  and "x1L1 x2"
  shows "(≤⇘L2 x1 (η1 x2))  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
proof -
  from mono_l1 half_galois_prop_right1 refl_L1 x1L1 x2 have "x2L1 η1 x2"
    by (blast intro: t1.rel_unit_if_reflexive_on_if_half_galois_prop_right_if_mono_wrt_rel)
  with refl_L1 have "η1 x2L1 η1 x2" by blast
  with dep_mono_wrt_relD[OF dep_mono_wrt_predD[OF antimono_L2] x2L1 η1 x2]
    show "(≤⇘L2 x1 (η1 x2))  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)" using x1L1 x2 by auto
qed

lemma left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_monoI':
  assumes "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1"
  and "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_field (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "((x1 : )  (x2 _  (≤L1) | x1L1 x2)  (≤)) L2"
  and "((x1 : )  (x2 x3  (≤L1) | (x1L1 x2  x3L1 η1 x2))  (≥)) L2"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "gR g"
  shows "f Lg  ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
  using assms by (intro left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_monoI
    left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_left_rel2_unit1_le_assmI
    left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_left_rel2_le_assmI)
  (auto intro: reflexive_on_if_le_pred_if_reflexive_on in_field_if_in_codom
    in_field_if_in_dom)

corollary left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_mono_if_galois_connectionI:
  assumes "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_field (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "((x1 : )  (x2 _  (≤L1) | x1L1 x2)  (≤)) L2"
  and "((x1 : )  (x2 x3  (≤L1) | (x1L1 x2  x3L1 η1 x2))  (≥)) L2"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "gR g"
  shows "f Lg  ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
  using assms by (intro left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_monoI') auto

interpretation flip_inv : galois "(≥R1)" "(≥L1)" r1 l1 .

lemma left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_left_rel2_unit1_le_assm_if_galois_equivI:
  assumes galois_equiv1: "((≤L1) G (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and refl_L1: "reflexive_on (in_field (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and mono_L2: "((x1 : )  (x2 _  (≤L1) | x1L1 x2)  (≤)) L2"
  and "x1L1 x2"
  shows "(≤⇘L2 x1 (η1 x2))  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
proof -
  from refl_L1 x1L1 x2 have "x1L1 x1" by blast
  from galois_equiv1 refl_L1 x1L1 x2 have "η1 x2L1 x2" by (intro
    flip.t1.counit_rel_if_reflexive_on_if_half_galois_prop_left_if_mono_wrt_rel)
    blast+
  have "x1L1 η1 x2" by (rule t1.rel_unit_if_left_rel_if_mono_wrt_relI)
    (insert galois_equiv1 refl_L1 x1L1 x2, auto)
  with dep_mono_wrt_relD[OF dep_mono_wrt_predD[OF mono_L2] η1 x2L1 x2]
    show "(≤⇘L2 x1 (η1 x2))  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)" by auto
qed

lemma left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_galois_equivalenceI:
  assumes "((≤L1) G (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_field (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "((x1 : )  (x2 _  (≤L1) | x1L1 x2)  (≤)) L2"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "gR g"
  shows "f Lg  ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
  using assms by (intro
    left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_monoI
    left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_left_rel2_le_assmI
    left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_left_rel2_unit1_le_assm_if_galois_equivI)
  auto

corollary left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_galois_equivalenceI':
  assumes "((≤L1) G (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_field (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "((x1 x2  (≥L1))  (x3 x4  (≤L1) | x1L1 x3)  (≤)) L2"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "gR g"
  shows "f Lg  ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
  using assms by (intro left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_galois_equivalenceI
    reflexive_on_in_field_mono_assm_left2I)
  auto

corollary left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_preorder_equivalenceI:
  assumes "((≤L1) ≡pre (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "((x1 x2  (≥L1))  (x3 x4  (≤L1) | x1L1 x3)  (≤)) L2"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "gR g"
  shows "f Lg  ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
  using assms by (intro left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_galois_equivalenceI')
  auto


corollary left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_preorder_equivalenceI':
  assumes "((≤L1) ≡pre (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))pre (≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')) (l2⇘x' x) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "((x1 x2  (≥L1))  (x3 x4  (≤L1) | x1L1 x3)  (≤)) L2"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "gR g"
  shows "f Lg  ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
  using assms by (intro left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_preorder_equivalenceI
    transitive_left2_if_preorder_equivalenceI)
  (auto 5 0)


subparagraph ‹Simplification of Restricted Function Relator›

lemma Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_eq_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI:
  assumes "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1" and "((≤R1)  (≤L1)) r1"
  and "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "x1' x2'. x1'R1 x2' 
    ((≤⇘L2 (r1 x1') (r1 x2')) h (≤⇘R2 (ε1 x1') x2')) (l2⇘x2' (r1 x1')) (r2⇘(r1 x1') x2')"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  (≤⇘L2 x1 (η1 x2))  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "x1' x2'. x1'R1 x2'  (≤⇘R2 (ε1 x1') x2')  (≤⇘R2 x1' x2')"
  and "x1' x2' y. x1'R1 x2'  in_dom (≤⇘L2 (r1 x1') (r1 x2')) y 
    (≤⇘R2 x1' x2') (l2⇘x2' (r1 x1')y)  (≤⇘R2 x1' x2') (l2⇘x1' (r1 x1')y)"
  and "x1 x2 y'. x1L1 x2  in_codom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) (l1 x2)) y' 
    (≥⇘L2 x1 x2) (r2⇘x1 (l1 x2)y')  (≥⇘L2 x1 x2) (r2⇘x2 (l1 x2)y')"
  shows "((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅))in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙
    = ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅))"
  using assms by (intro ext iffI rel_restrict_leftI rel_restrict_rightI
    in_domI[where ?y="r _"] left_rel_right_if_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI
    in_codomI[where ?x="l _"] left_right_rel_if_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI)
  auto

lemma Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_eq_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI':
  assumes "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_field (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "reflexive_on (in_field (≤R1)) (≤R1)"
  and "x1' x2'. x1'R1 x2' 
    ((≤⇘L2 (r1 x1') (r1 x2')) h (≤⇘R2 (ε1 x1') x2')) (l2⇘x2' (r1 x1')) (r2⇘(r1 x1') x2')"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x3 x4  (≤L1) | (x2L1 x3  x4L1 η1 x3))  (≥)) L2"
  and "((x1' x2'  (≤R1) | ε1 x2'R1 x1')  (x3' x4'  (≤R1) | x2'R1 x3')  (≤)) R2"
  and "((x1' x2'  (≤R1))  (x1 x2  (≤L1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))  (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')) l2"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "x1' x2'. x1'R1 x2'  transitive (≤⇘R2 x1' x2')"
  shows "((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅))in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙
    = ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅))"
  using assms by (intro
    Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_eq_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI
    left_rel_right_iff_left_right_rel_if_galois_prop_le_assms_leftI
    reflexive_on_in_field_mono_assm_left2I
    left_rel_right_iff_left_right_rel_if_galois_prop_le_assms_rightI
    mono_wrt_rel_left_in_dom_mono_left_assm
    galois_connection_left_right_if_galois_connection_mono_assms_leftI
    galois_connection_left_right_if_galois_connection_mono_assms_rightI
    left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_ge_left_rel2_assmI)
  auto

text ‹Simplification of Restricted Function Relator for Nested Transports›

lemma Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_restrict_left_right_eq:
  fixes S :: "'a1  'a2  'b1  'b2  bool"
  assumes "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  shows "((x x'  (L1⪅))  (S x x')in_dom (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))in_codom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x'))
      in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙ =
    ((x x'  (L1⪅))  S x x')in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙" (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof -
  have "?lhs =
    ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (S x x')in_codom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x'))
      in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙"
    by (subst rel_restrict_left_right_eq_restrict_right_left,
      subst Dep_Fun_Rel_restrict_left_restrict_left_eq)
    auto
  also have "... = ?rhs"
    using assms by (subst rel_restrict_left_right_eq_restrict_right_left,
      subst Dep_Fun_Rel_restrict_right_restrict_right_eq)
    (auto elim!: in_codomE t1.left_GaloisE
      simp only: rel_restrict_left_right_eq_restrict_right_left)
  finally show ?thesis .
qed

end


paragraph ‹Function Relator›

context transport_Fun_Rel
begin

corollary Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_left_GaloisI:
  assumes "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_dom (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "((≤R2)  (≤L2)) r2"
  and "transitive (≤L2)"
  and "gR g"
  and "f Lg"
  shows "((L1⪅)  (L2⪅)) f g"
  by (urule tdfr.Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_left_GaloisI assms | simp)+

corollary left_Galois_if_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI:
  assumes "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1"
  and "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "in_codom (≤R) g"
  and "((L1⪅)  (L2⪅)) f g"
  shows "f Lg"
  by (urule tdfr.left_Galois_if_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI assms | simp)+

lemma left_Galois_if_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI':
  assumes "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1" and "((≤R1)  (≤L1)) r1"
  and "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "((≤L2) h (≤R2)) l2 r2"
  and "((L1⪅)  (L2⪅)) f g"
  shows "f Lg"
  by (urule tdfr.left_Galois_if_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI' assms | simp)+

corollary left_Galois_iff_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI:
  assumes "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1"
  and "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_dom (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "((≤R2)  (≤L2)) r2"
  and "transitive (≤L2)"
  and "gR g"
  shows "f Lg  ((L1⪅)  (L2⪅)) f g"
  by (urule tdfr.left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI assms | simp)+


subparagraph ‹Simplification of Restricted Function Relator›

lemma Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_eq_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI:
  assumes "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1" and "((≤R1)  (≤L1)) r1"
  and "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "((≤L2) h (≤R2)) l2 r2"
  shows "((L1⪅)  (L2⪅))in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙ = ((L1⪅)  (L2⪅))"
  by (urule tdfr.Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_eq_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI assms
  | simp)+

text ‹Simplification of Restricted Function Relator for Nested Transports›

lemma Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_restrict_left_right_eq:
  fixes S :: "'b1  'b2  bool"
  assumes "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  shows "((L1⪅)  Sin_dom (≤⇘L2⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R2⇙)⇙)in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙ =
    ((L1⪅)  S)in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙"
  by (urule tdfr.Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_restrict_left_right_eq assms | simp)+

end


paragraph ‹Monotone Dependent Function Relator›

context transport_Mono_Dep_Fun_Rel
begin

lemma Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_left_GaloisI:
  assumes "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_dom (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  (≤⇘L2 x1 x1)  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "x x' y'. x L1x'  in_dom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x') y' 
    (≥⇘L2 x (r1 x')) (r2⇘x (l1 x)y')  (≥⇘L2 x (r1 x')) (r2⇘x x'y')"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "f Lg"
  shows "((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
  using assms unfolding left_rel_eq_tdfr_left_Refl_Rel right_rel_eq_tdfr_right_Refl_Rel
  by (intro tdfr.Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_left_GaloisI tdfr.left_GaloisI)
  (auto elim!: galois_rel.left_GaloisE in_codomE)

lemma left_Galois_if_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI:
  assumes "(tdfr.R  tdfr.L) r"
  and "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1"
  and "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  (≤⇘L2 x1 (η1 x2))  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "x1 x2 y'. x1L1 x2  in_codom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) (l1 x2)) y' 
    (≥⇘L2 x1 x2) (r2⇘x1 (l1 x2)y')  (≥⇘L2 x1 x2) (r2⇘x2 (l1 x2)y')"
  and "in_dom (≤L) f"
  and "in_codom (≤R) g"
  and "((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
  shows "f Lg"
  using assms unfolding left_rel_eq_tdfr_left_Refl_Rel right_rel_eq_tdfr_right_Refl_Rel
  by (intro tdfr.Galois_Refl_RelI tdfr.left_Galois_if_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI)
  (auto simp: in_codom_eq_in_dom_if_reflexive_on_in_field)

lemma left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI:
  assumes "(tdfr.R  tdfr.L) r"
  and "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1"
  and "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_field (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  (≤⇘L2 x1 x1)  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  (≤⇘L2 x1 (η1 x2))  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "in_dom (≤L) f"
  and "in_codom (≤R) g"
  shows "f Lg  ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
  using assms by (intro iffI Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_left_GaloisI
    tdfr.left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_ge_left_rel2_assmI'
    tdfr.left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_mono_assm_in_dom_rightI)
  (auto intro!: left_Galois_if_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI
    tdfr.left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_ge_left_rel2_assmI
    tdfr.left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_mono_assm_in_codom_rightI
    intro: reflexive_on_if_le_pred_if_reflexive_on
      in_field_if_in_dom in_field_if_in_codom)

lemma left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_mono_if_galois_connectionI:
  assumes galois_conn1: "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and refl_L1: "reflexive_on (in_field (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  (≤⇘L2 x1 x1)  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and L2_le_unit2: "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  (≤⇘L2 x1 (η1 x2))  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and mono_r2: "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and trans_L2: "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "in_dom (≤L) f"
  and "in_codom (≤R) g"
  shows "f Lg  ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g" (is "?lhs  ?rhs")
proof -
  have "(≤⇘L2 x1 x2) (r2⇘x1 (l1 x2)y')  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2) (r2⇘x1 (l1 x1)y')"
    if hyps: "x1L1 x2" "in_dom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) (l1 x2)) y'" for x1 x2 y'
  proof -
    have "((in_dom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) (l1 x2)))  (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)) (r2⇘x1 (l1 x1)) (r2⇘x1 (l1 x2))"
    proof (intro Fun_Rel_predI)
      from galois_conn1 refl_L1 x1L1 x2
        have "x1L1 x1" "l1 x1R1 l1 x2" "x1 L1l1 x1"
        by (blast intro: t1.left_Galois_left_if_left_relI)+
      fix y' assume "in_dom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) (l1 x2)) y'"
      with Dep_Fun_Rel_relD[OF dep_mono_wrt_relD[OF mono_r2 x1L1 x1]
        l1 x1R1 l1 x2]
        have "r2⇘x1 (l1 x1)y' ≤⇘L2 x1 (η1 x2)⇙ r2⇘x1 (l1 x2)y'"
        using x1 L1l1 x1 by (auto dest: in_field_if_in_dom)
      with L2_le_unit2 x1L1 x2 show "r2⇘x1 (l1 x1)y' ≤⇘L2 x1 x2⇙ r2⇘x1 (l1 x2)y'"
        by blast
    qed
    with hyps show ?thesis using trans_L2 by blast
  qed
  then show ?thesis using assms
    using assms by (intro left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI
      tdfr.mono_wrt_rel_rightI
      tdfr.mono_wrt_rel_right2_if_mono_wrt_rel_right2_if_left_GaloisI
      tdfr.left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_ge_left_rel2_assmI
      tdfr.left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_mono_assm_in_codom_rightI)
    (auto intro: reflexive_on_if_le_pred_if_reflexive_on in_field_if_in_codom)
qed

corollary left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_mono_if_galois_connectionI':
  assumes "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_field (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "((x1 : )  (x2 _  (≤L1) | x1L1 x2)  (≤)) L2"
  and "((x1 : )  (x2 x3  (≤L1) | (x1L1 x2  x3L1 η1 x2))  (≥)) L2"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "in_dom (≤L) f"
  and "in_codom (≤R) g"
  shows "f Lg  ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g" (is "?lhs  ?rhs")
  using assms by (intro
    left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_mono_if_galois_connectionI
    tdfr.left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_left_rel2_unit1_le_assmI
    tdfr.left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_left_rel2_le_assmI)
  auto

corollary left_Galois_eq_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_if_mono_if_galois_connectionI:
  assumes "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_field (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "((x1 : )  (x2 _  (≤L1) | x1L1 x2)  (≤)) L2"
  and "((x1 : )  (x2 x3  (≤L1) | (x1L1 x2  x3L1 η1 x2))  (≥)) L2"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  shows "(L⪅) = ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅))in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙"
  using assms by (intro ext iffI rel_restrict_leftI rel_restrict_rightI
    iffD1[OF left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_mono_if_galois_connectionI'])
  (auto intro!:
    iffD2[OF left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_mono_if_galois_connectionI'])

lemma left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_galois_equivalenceI:
  assumes "((≤L1) G (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_field (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "((x1 x2  (≥L1))  (x3 x4  (≤L1) | x1L1 x3)  (≤)) L2"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "in_dom (≤L) f"
  and "in_codom (≤R) g"
  shows "f Lg  ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
  using assms by (intro left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_mono_if_galois_connectionI
    tdfr.left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_left_rel2_le_assmI
    tdfr.reflexive_on_in_field_mono_assm_left2I
    tdfr.left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_left_rel2_unit1_le_assm_if_galois_equivI)
  auto

theorem left_Galois_eq_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_if_galois_equivalenceI:
  assumes "((≤L1) G (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_field (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "((x1 x2  (≥L1))  (x3 x4  (≤L1) | x1L1 x3)  (≤)) L2"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  shows "(L⪅) = ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅))in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙"
  using assms by (intro ext iffI rel_restrict_leftI rel_restrict_rightI
    iffD1[OF left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_galois_equivalenceI])
  (auto intro!: iffD2[OF left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_galois_equivalenceI])

corollary left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_preorder_equivalenceI:
  assumes "((≤L1) ≡pre (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "((x1 x2  (≥L1))  (x3 x4  (≤L1) | x1L1 x3)  (≤)) L2"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "in_dom (≤L) f"
  and "in_codom (≤R) g"
  shows "f Lg  ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
  using assms by (intro left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_galois_equivalenceI)
  auto

corollary left_Galois_eq_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_if_preorder_equivalenceI:
  assumes "((≤L1) ≡pre (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')  (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "((x1 x2  (≥L1))  (x3 x4  (≤L1) | x1L1 x3)  (≤)) L2"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  shows "(L⪅) = ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅))in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙"
  using assms by (intro ext iffI rel_restrict_leftI rel_restrict_rightI
    iffD1[OF left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_preorder_equivalenceI])
  (auto intro!: iffD2[OF left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_preorder_equivalenceI])

corollary left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_preorder_equivalenceI':
  assumes "((≤L1) ≡pre (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))pre (≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')) (l2⇘x' x) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "((x1 x2  (≥L1))  (x3 x4  (≤L1) | x1L1 x3)  (≤)) L2"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "in_dom (≤L) f"
  and "in_codom (≤R) g"
  shows "f Lg  ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅)) f g"
  using assms by (intro left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_preorder_equivalenceI
    tdfr.transitive_left2_if_preorder_equivalenceI)
  (auto 5 0)

corollary left_Galois_eq_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_if_preorder_equivalenceI':
  assumes "((≤L1) ≡pre (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "x x'. x L1x'  ((≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))pre (≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x')) (l2⇘x' x) (r2⇘x x')"
  and "((x1 x2  (≥L1))  (x3 x4  (≤L1) | x1L1 x3)  (≤)) L2"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  shows "(L⪅) = ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅))in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙"
  using assms by (intro ext iffI rel_restrict_leftI rel_restrict_rightI
    iffD1[OF left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_preorder_equivalenceI'])
  (auto intro!: iffD2[OF left_Galois_iff_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_preorder_equivalenceI'])


subparagraph ‹Simplification of Restricted Function Relator›

lemma Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_eq_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_reflexive_onI:
  assumes "reflexive_on (in_field tdfr.L) tdfr.L"
  and "reflexive_on (in_field tdfr.R) tdfr.R"
  and "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_field (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "reflexive_on (in_field (≤R1)) (≤R1)"
  and "x1' x2'. x1'R1 x2' 
    ((≤⇘L2 (r1 x1') (r1 x2')) h (≤⇘R2 (ε1 x1') x2')) (l2⇘x2' (r1 x1')) (r2⇘(r1 x1') x2')"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x3 x4  (≤L1) | (x2L1 x3  x4L1 η1 x3))  (≥)) L2"
  and "((x1' x2'  (≤R1) | ε1 x2'R1 x1')  (x3' x4'  (≤R1) | x2'R1 x3')  (≤)) R2"
  and "((x1' x2'  (≤R1))  (x1 x2  (≤L1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))  (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')) l2"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  transitive (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
  and "x1' x2'. x1'R1 x2'  transitive (≤⇘R2 x1' x2')"
  shows "((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅))in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙
    = ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅))"
  using assms by (auto simp only: left_rel_eq_tdfr_left_rel_if_reflexive_on
      right_rel_eq_tdfr_right_rel_if_reflexive_on
    intro!: tdfr.Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_eq_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI')

interpretation flip : transport_Dep_Fun_Rel R1 L1 r1 l1 R2 L2 r2 l2
  rewrites "flip.t1.unit  ε1" by (simp only: t1.flip_unit_eq_counit)

lemma Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_eq_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI:
  assumes "((≤L1) ≡pre (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "x1' x2'. x1'R1 x2' 
    ((≤⇘L2 (r1 x1') (r1 x2')) h (≤⇘R2 (ε1 x1') x2')) (l2⇘x2' (r1 x1')) (r2⇘(r1 x1') x2')"
  and "((x1 x2  (≥L1))  (x3 x4  (≤L1) | x1L1 x3)  (≤)) L2"
  and "((x1' x2'  (≥R1))  (x3' x4'  (≤R1) | x1'R1 x3')  (≤)) R2"
  and "((x1' x2'  (≤R1))  (x1 x2  (≤L1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))  (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')) l2"
  and "((x1 x2  (≤L1))  (x1' x2'  (≤R1) | x2 L1x1') 
    in_field (≤⇘R2 (l1 x1) x2')  (≤⇘L2 x1 (r1 x2'))) r2"
  and PERS: "x1 x2. x1L1 x2  partial_equivalence_rel (≤⇘L2 x1 x2)"
    "x1' x2'. x1'R1 x2'  partial_equivalence_rel (≤⇘R2 x1' x2')"
  shows "((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅))in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙
    = ((x x'  (L1⪅))  (⇘L2 x x'⇙⪅))"
  using assms by (intro
    Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_eq_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_reflexive_onI
    tdfr.reflexive_on_in_field_left_if_equivalencesI
    flip.reflexive_on_in_field_left_if_equivalencesI
    tdfr.galois_equivalence_if_mono_if_galois_equivalence_mono_assms_leftI
    flip.galois_equivalence_if_mono_if_galois_equivalence_mono_assms_leftI)
  (auto dest!: PERS)


text ‹Simplification of Restricted Function Relator for Nested Transports›

lemma Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_restrict_left_right_eq:
  fixes S :: "'a1  'a2  'b1  'b2  bool"
  assumes "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  shows "((x x'  (L1⪅))  (S x x')in_dom (≤⇘L2 x (r1 x'))in_codom (≤⇘R2 (l1 x) x'))
      in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙ =
    ((x x'  (L1⪅))  S x x')in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙"
    (is "?lhs?DL?CR= ?rhs?DL?CR⇙")
proof (intro ext)
  fix f g
  have "?lhs?DL?CRf g  ?lhs f g  ?DL f  ?CR g" by blast
  also have "...  ?lhsin_dom tdfr.Lin_codom tdfr.Rf g  ?DL f  ?CR g"
    unfolding left_rel_eq_tdfr_left_Refl_Rel right_rel_eq_tdfr_right_Refl_Rel
    by blast
  also with assms have "...  ?rhsin_dom tdfr.Lin_codom tdfr.Rf g  ?DL f  ?CR g"
    by (simp only:
      tdfr.Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_restrict_left_right_eq)
  also have "...  ?rhs?DL?CRf g"
    unfolding left_rel_eq_tdfr_left_Refl_Rel right_rel_eq_tdfr_right_Refl_Rel
    by blast
  finally show "?lhs?DL?CRf g  ?rhs?DL?CRf g" .
qed

end


paragraph ‹Monotone Function Relator›

context transport_Mono_Fun_Rel
begin

corollary Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_left_GaloisI:
  assumes "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_dom (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "((≤R2)  (≤L2)) (r2)"
  and "transitive (≤L2)"
  and "f Lg"
  shows "((L1⪅)  (L2⪅)) f g"
  by (urule tpdfr.Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_left_GaloisI assms | simp)+

interpretation flip : transport_Mono_Fun_Rel R1 L1 r1 l1 R2 L2 r2 l2 .

lemma left_Galois_if_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI:
  assumes "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1"
  and "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "((≤R2)  (≤L2)) r2"
  and "in_dom (≤L) f"
  and "in_codom (≤R) g"
  and "((L1⪅)  (L2⪅)) f g"
  shows "f Lg"
  by (urule tpdfr.left_Galois_if_Dep_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI flip.tfr.mono_wrt_rel_leftI)+
   (urule assms | simp)+

corollary left_Galois_iff_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI:
  assumes "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1"
  and "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_dom (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "((≤R2)  (≤L2)) (r2)"
  and "transitive (≤L2)"
  and "in_dom (≤L) f"
  and "in_codom (≤R) g"
  shows "f Lg  ((L1⪅)  (L2⪅)) f g"
  using assms by (intro iffI Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_left_GaloisI)
  (auto intro!: left_Galois_if_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI)

theorem left_Galois_eq_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrictI:
  assumes "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1"
  and "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_dom (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "((≤R2)  (≤L2)) r2"
  and "transitive (≤L2)"
  shows "(L⪅) = ((L1⪅)  (L2⪅))in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙"
  using assms by (intro ext iffI rel_restrict_leftI rel_restrict_rightI
    iffD1[OF left_Galois_iff_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI])
  (auto elim!: tpdfr.left_GaloisE intro!: iffD2[OF left_Galois_iff_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI])


subparagraph ‹Simplification of Restricted Function Relator›

lemma Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_eq_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_reflexive_onI:
  assumes "reflexive_on (in_field tfr.tdfr.L) tfr.tdfr.L"
  and "reflexive_on (in_field tfr.tdfr.R) tfr.tdfr.R"
  and "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1" and "((≤R1)  (≤L1)) r1"
  and "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "((≤L2) h (≤R2)) l2 r2"
  shows "((L1⪅)  (L2⪅))in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙ = ((L1⪅)  (L2⪅))"
  using assms by (auto simp only: tpdfr.left_rel_eq_tdfr_left_rel_if_reflexive_on
      tpdfr.right_rel_eq_tdfr_right_rel_if_reflexive_on
    intro!: tfr.Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_eq_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI)

lemma Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_eq_Fun_Rel_left_GaloisI:
  assumes "((≤L1)  (≤R1)) l1" and "((≤R1)  (≤L1)) r1"
  and "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  and "reflexive_on (in_field (≤L1)) (≤L1)"
  and "reflexive_on (in_field (≤R1)) (≤R1)"
  and "((≤L2) h (≤R2)) l2 r2"
  and "partial_equivalence_rel (≤L2)"
  and "partial_equivalence_rel (≤R2)"
  shows "((L1⪅)  (L2⪅))in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙ = ((L1⪅)  (L2⪅))"
  using assms by (intro
    Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_eq_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_if_reflexive_onI
    tfr.reflexive_on_in_field_leftI
    flip.tfr.reflexive_on_in_field_leftI)
  auto


text ‹Simplification of Restricted Function Relator for Nested Transports›

lemma Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_restrict_left_right_eq:
  fixes S :: "'b1  'b2  bool"
  assumes "((≤L1) h (≤R1)) l1 r1"
  shows "((L1⪅)  Sin_dom (≤⇘L2⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R2⇙)⇙)in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙ =
    ((L1⪅)  S)in_dom (≤⇘L⇙)⇙in_codom (≤⇘R⇙)⇙"
  by (urule tpdfr.Dep_Fun_Rel_left_Galois_restrict_left_right_restrict_left_right_eq assms | simp)+

end


end