Theory ContextFacts
subsection‹Contextual typing›
theory ContextFacts
imports
Reduction
Types
begin
text‹Naturally, we may wonder when instantiating the hole in a context is type-preserving.
To assess this, we define a typing judgement for contexts.›
inductive typing_ctxt :: "(nat ⇒ type) ⇒ (nat ⇒ type) ⇒ ctxt ⇒ type ⇒ type ⇒ bool"
(‹_ , _ ⊢⇩c⇩t⇩x⇩t _ : _ ⇐ _› [50, 50, 50, 50, 50] 50)
where
type_ctxtEmpty [intro!]: "Γ, Δ ⊢⇩c⇩t⇩x⇩t ◇ : T ⇐ T" |
type_ctxtApp [intro!]: "⟦ Γ, Δ ⊢⇩c⇩t⇩x⇩t E : (T1→T2) ⇐ U; Γ, Δ ⊢⇩T t : T1 ⟧ ⟹ Γ, Δ ⊢⇩c⇩t⇩x⇩t (E ⇧∙ t) : T2 ⇐ U"
inductive_cases typing_ctxt_elims [elim!]:
"Γ, Δ ⊢⇩c⇩t⇩x⇩t ◇ : T ⇐ T"
"Γ, Δ ⊢⇩c⇩t⇩x⇩t (E ⇧∙ t) : T ⇐ U"
lemma typing_ctxt_correct1:
shows "Γ, Δ ⊢⇩T (ctxt_subst E r) : T ⟹ ∃U. (Γ, Δ ⊢⇩T r : U ∧ Γ, Δ ⊢⇩c⇩t⇩x⇩t E : T ⇐ U)"
by(induction E arbitrary: Γ Δ T r; force)
lemma typing_ctxt_correct2:
shows "Γ, Δ ⊢⇩c⇩t⇩x⇩t E : T ⇐ U ⟹ Γ, Δ ⊢⇩T r : U ⟹ Γ, Δ ⊢⇩T (ctxt_subst E r) : T"
by(induction arbitrary: r rule: typing_ctxt.induct) auto
lemma ctxt_subst_basecase:
"∀n. c[n = n ◇]⇧C = c"
"∀n. t[n = n ◇]⇧T = t"
by(induct c and t) (auto)
lemma ctxt_subst_caseApp:
"∀n E s. (c[n=n (liftM_ctxt E n)]⇧C)[n=n (◇ ⇧∙ (liftM_trm s n))]⇧C = c[n=n ((liftM_ctxt E n) ⇧∙ (liftM_trm s n))]⇧C"
"∀n E s. (t[n=n (liftM_ctxt E n)]⇧T)[n=n (◇ ⇧∙ (liftM_trm s n))]⇧T = t[n=n ((liftM_ctxt E n) ⇧∙ (liftM_trm s n))]⇧T"
by (induction c and t) (auto simp add: liftLM_comm_ctxt liftLM_comm liftMM_comm_ctxt liftMM_comm liftM_ctxt_struct_subst)
lemma ctxt_subst:
assumes "Γ, Δ ⊢⇩c⇩t⇩x⇩t E : U ⇐ T"
shows "(ctxt_subst E (μ T : c)) ⇢⇧* μ U : (c[0 = 0 (liftM_ctxt E 0)]⇧C)"
using assms proof(induct E arbitrary: U T Γ Δ c)
case ContextEmpty
have ctxtEmpty_inv: "Γ, Δ ⊢⇩c⇩t⇩x⇩t ◇ : U ⇐ T ⟹ U = T"
by(cases Γ Δ "◇" rule: typing_ctxt.cases, fastforce, simp)
show ?case
using ContextEmpty by (clarsimp dest!: ctxtEmpty_inv simp: ctxt_subst_basecase)
next
case (ContextApp E x)
then show ?case
by clarsimp (rule rtc_term_trans, rule rtc_appL, assumption, rule step_term, force, clarsimp simp add: ctxt_subst_caseApp(1))
qed
end