Theory VeriComp.Well_founded
section ‹Well-foundedness of Relations Defined as Predicate Functions›
theory Well_founded
imports Main
begin
subsection ‹Lexicographic product›
context
fixes
r1 :: "'a ⇒ 'a ⇒ bool" and
r2 :: "'b ⇒ 'b ⇒ bool"
begin
definition lex_prodp :: "'a × 'b ⇒ 'a × 'b ⇒ bool" where
"lex_prodp x y ≡ r1 (fst x) (fst y) ∨ fst x = fst y ∧ r2 (snd x) (snd y)"
lemma lex_prodp_lex_prod:
shows "lex_prodp x y ⟷ (x, y) ∈ lex_prod { (x, y). r1 x y } { (x, y). r2 x y }"
by (auto simp: lex_prod_def lex_prodp_def)
lemma lex_prodp_wfP:
assumes
"wfp r1" and
"wfp r2"
shows "wfp lex_prodp"
proof (rule wfpUNIVI)
show "⋀P. ∀x. (∀y. lex_prodp y x ⟶ P y) ⟶ P x ⟹ (⋀x. P x)"
proof -
fix P
assume "∀x. (∀y. lex_prodp y x ⟶ P y) ⟶ P x"
hence hyps: "(⋀y1 y2. lex_prodp (y1, y2) (x1, x2) ⟹ P (y1, y2)) ⟹ P (x1, x2)" for x1 x2
by fast
show "(⋀x. P x)"
apply (simp only: split_paired_all)
apply (atomize (full))
apply (rule allI)
apply (rule wfp_induct_rule[OF assms(1), of "λy. ∀b. P (y, b)"])
apply (rule allI)
apply (rule wfp_induct_rule[OF assms(2), of "λb. P (x, b)" for x])
using hyps[unfolded lex_prodp_def, simplified]
by blast
qed
qed
end
subsection ‹Lexicographic list›
context
fixes order :: "'a ⇒ 'a ⇒ bool"
begin
inductive lexp :: "'a list ⇒ 'a list ⇒ bool" where
lexp_head: "order x y ⟹ length xs = length ys ⟹ lexp (x # xs) (y # ys)" |
lexp_tail: "lexp xs ys ⟹ lexp (x # xs) (x # ys)"
end
lemma lexp_prepend: "lexp order ys zs ⟹ lexp order (xs @ ys) (xs @ zs)"
by (induction xs) (simp_all add: lexp_tail)
lemma lexp_lex: "lexp order xs ys ⟷ (xs, ys) ∈ lex {(x, y). order x y}"
proof
assume "lexp order xs ys"
thus "(xs, ys) ∈ lex {(x, y). order x y}"
by (induction xs ys rule: lexp.induct) simp_all
next
assume "(xs, ys) ∈ lex {(x, y). order x y}"
thus "lexp order xs ys"
by (auto intro!: lexp_prepend intro: lexp_head simp: lex_conv)
qed
lemma lex_list_wfP: "wfP order ⟹ wfP (lexp order)"
by (simp add: lexp_lex wf_lex wfp_def)
end