Theory VeriComp.Semantics
section ‹The Dynamic Representation of a Language›
theory Semantics
imports Main Behaviour Inf Transfer_Extras begin
text ‹
The definition of programming languages is separated into two parts: an abstract semantics and a concrete program representation.
›
definition finished :: "('a ⇒ 'a ⇒ bool) ⇒ 'a ⇒ bool" where
"finished r x = (∄y. r x y)"
lemma finished_star:
assumes "finished r x"
shows "r⇧*⇧* x y ⟹ x = y"
proof (induction y rule: rtranclp_induct)
case base
then show ?case by simp
next
case (step y z)
then show ?case
using assms by (auto simp: finished_def)
qed
locale semantics =
fixes
step :: "'state ⇒ 'state ⇒ bool" (infix ‹→› 50) and
final :: "'state ⇒ bool"
assumes
final_finished: "final s ⟹ finished step s"
begin
text ‹
The semantics locale represents the semantics as an abstract machine.
It is expressed by a transition system with a transition relation @{term step}---usually written as an infix @{text →} arrow---and final states @{term final}.
›
lemma finished_step:
"step s s' ⟹ ¬finished step s"
by (auto simp add: finished_def)
abbreviation eval :: "'state ⇒ 'state ⇒ bool" (infix ‹→⇧*› 50) where
"eval ≡ step⇧*⇧*"
abbreviation inf_step :: "'state ⇒ bool" where
"inf_step ≡ inf step"
notation
inf_step (‹'(→⇧∞')› [] 50) and
inf_step (‹_ →⇧∞› [55] 50)
lemma inf_not_finished: "s →⇧∞ ⟹ ¬ finished step s"
using inf.cases finished_step by metis
lemma eval_deterministic:
assumes
deterministic: "⋀x y z. step x y ⟹ step x z ⟹ y = z" and
"s1 →⇧* s2" and "s1 →⇧* s3" and "finished step s2" and "finished step s3"
shows "s2 = s3"
proof -
have "right_unique step"
using deterministic by (auto intro: right_uniqueI)
with assms show ?thesis
by (auto simp: finished_def intro: rtranclp_complete_run_right_unique)
qed
lemma step_converges_or_diverges: "(∃s'. s →⇧* s' ∧ finished step s') ∨ s →⇧∞"
by (smt (verit, del_insts) finished_def inf.coinduct rtranclp.intros(2) rtranclp.rtrancl_refl)
subsection ‹Behaviour of a dynamic execution›
inductive state_behaves :: "'state ⇒ 'state behaviour ⇒ bool" (infix ‹↓› 50) where
state_terminates:
"s1 →⇧* s2 ⟹ finished step s2 ⟹ final s2 ⟹ s1 ↓ (Terminates s2)" |
state_diverges:
"s1 →⇧∞ ⟹ s1 ↓ Diverges" |
state_goes_wrong:
"s1 →⇧* s2 ⟹ finished step s2 ⟹ ¬ final s2 ⟹ s1 ↓ (Goes_wrong s2)"
text ‹
Even though the @{term step} transition relation in the @{locale semantics} locale need not be deterministic, if it happens to be, then the behaviour of a program becomes deterministic too.
›
lemma right_unique_state_behaves:
assumes
"right_unique (→)"
shows "right_unique (↓)"
proof (rule right_uniqueI)
fix s b1 b2
assume "s ↓ b1" "s ↓ b2"
thus "b1 = b2"
by (auto simp: finished_def simp del: not_ex
elim!: state_behaves.cases
dest: rtranclp_complete_run_right_unique[OF ‹right_unique (→)›, of s]
dest: final_finished star_inf[OF ‹right_unique (→)›, THEN inf_not_finished])
qed
lemma left_total_state_behaves: "left_total (↓)"
proof (rule left_totalI)
fix s
show "∃b. s ↓ b"
using step_converges_or_diverges[of s]
proof (elim disjE exE conjE)
fix s'
assume "s →⇧* s'" and "finished (→) s'"
thus "∃b. s ↓ b"
by (cases "final s'") (auto intro: state_terminates state_goes_wrong)
next
assume "s →⇧∞"
thus "∃b. s ↓ b"
by (auto intro: state_diverges)
qed
qed
subsection ‹Safe states›
definition safe where
"safe s ⟷ (∀s'. step⇧*⇧* s s' ⟶ final s' ∨ (∃s''. step s' s''))"
lemma final_safeI: "final s ⟹ safe s"
by (metis final_finished finished_star safe_def)
lemma step_safe: "step s s' ⟹ safe s ⟹ safe s'"
by (simp add: converse_rtranclp_into_rtranclp safe_def)
lemma steps_safe: "step⇧*⇧* s s' ⟹ safe s ⟹ safe s'"
by (meson rtranclp_trans safe_def)
lemma safe_state_behaves_not_wrong:
assumes "safe s" and "s ↓ b"
shows "¬ is_wrong b"
using ‹s ↓ b›
proof (cases rule: state_behaves.cases)
case (state_goes_wrong s2)
then show ?thesis
using ‹safe s› by (auto simp: safe_def finished_def)
qed simp_all
end
end