Theory Nielson_Sqrt
theory Nielson_Sqrt
imports Nielson_VCGi "HOL-Library.Discrete_Functions"
begin
subsection ‹Example: discrete square root in Nielson's logic›
text ‹As an example, consider the following program that computes the discrete square root:›
definition c :: com where "c=
''l''::= N 0 ;;
''m'' ::= N 0 ;;
''r''::= Plus (N 1) (V ''x'');;
(WHILE (Less (Plus (N 1) (V ''l'')) (V ''r''))
DO (''m'' ::= (Div (Plus (V ''l'') (V ''r'')) (N 2)) ;;
(IF Not (Less (Times (V ''m'') (V ''m'')) (V ''x''))
THEN ''l'' ::= V ''m''
ELSE ''r'' ::= V ''m'');;
''m'' ::= N 0))"
text ‹In this theory we will show that its running time is in the order of magnitude of the
logarithm of the variable ''x''›
text ‹a little lemma we need later for bounding the running time:›
lemma absch: "⋀s k. 1 + s ''x'' = 2 ^ k ⟹ 5 * k ≤ 96 + 100 * floor_log (nat (s ''x''))"
proof -
fix s :: state and k :: nat
assume F: " 1 + s ''x'' = 2 ^ k "
then have i: "nat (1 + s ''x'') = 2 ^ k" and nn: "s ''x''≥ 0" apply (auto simp: nat_power_eq)
by (smt one_le_power)
have F: "1 + nat (s ''x'') = 2 ^k" unfolding i[symmetric] using nn by auto
show "5 * k ≤ 96 + 100 * floor_log (nat (s ''x''))"
proof (cases "s ''x'' ≥ 1")
case True
have "5 * k = 5 * (floor_log (2^k))" by auto
also have "… = 5 * floor_log (1 + nat (s ''x''))" by(simp only: F[symmetric])
also have "… ≤ 5 * floor_log (nat (s ''x'' + s ''x''))" using True
apply auto apply(rule monoD[OF floor_log_mono]) by auto
also have "… = 5 * floor_log (2 * nat (s ''x''))" by (auto simp: nat_mult_distrib)
also have "… = 5 + 5 * (floor_log (nat (s ''x'')))" using True by auto
also have "… ≤ 96 + 100 * floor_log (nat (s ''x''))" by simp
finally show ?thesis .
next
case False
with nn have gt1: "s ''x'' = 0" by auto
from F[unfolded gt1] have "2 ^ k = (1::int)" using floor_log_Suc_zero by auto
then have "k=0"
by (metis One_nat_def add.right_neutral gt1 i n_not_Suc_n nat_numeral nat_power_eq_Suc_0_iff numeral_2_eq_2 numeral_One)
then show ?thesis by(simp add: gt1)
qed
qed
text ‹For simplicity we assume, that during the process all segments between ''l'' and ''r'' have
as length a power of two. This simplifies the analysis.
To obtain this we choose the precondition P accordingly.
Now lets show the correctness of our time complexity: the binary search is in O(log ''x'') ›
lemma
assumes P: "P = (λl s. (∃k. 1 + s ''x'' = 2 ^ k) )"
and e : "e = (λs. floor_log (nat (s ''x'')) + 1)" and
Q[simp]: "Q = (λl s. True)"
shows " ⊢⇩1 {P} c { e ⇓ Q}"
proof -
let ?lb = "''m'' ::=
(Div (Plus (V ''l'') (V ''r'')) (N 2)) ;;
(IF Not (Less (Times (V ''m'') (V ''m'')) (V ''x''))
THEN ''l'' ::= V ''m''
ELSE ''r'' ::= V ''m'');;
(''m'' ::= N 0)::acom"
define I :: assn2 where "I ≡ (λl s. (∃k. s ''r'' - s ''l'' = 2 ^ k ) ∧ s ''l'' ≥ 0 )"
define E :: tbd where "E ≡ %s. 1 + 5 * floor_log (nat(s ''r'' - s ''l''))"
define S :: "state ⇒ state" where "S ≡ %s. s"
define Es :: "vname ⇒ vname set" where "Es = (%x. {x})"
define R :: "(assn2*(vname set))*((state⇒state)*(tbd*((vname set*(vname ⇒ vname set)))))"
where "R=((I,{''l'',''r''}),(S,(E,({''l'',''r''},Es))))"
let ?C = "''l''::= N 0 ;; (''m'' ::= N 0) ;; ''r''::= Plus (N 1) (V ''x'');; ({R} WHILE (Less (Plus (N 1) (V ''l'')) (V ''r'')) DO ?lb)"
have s: "strip ?C = c" unfolding c_def by auto
have v: "⊢⇩1 {P} strip ?C {e ⇓ Q}"
proof (rule vc_sound'', safe)
show "vc ?C Q {} {}" unfolding R_def apply (simp only: vc.simps) apply auto
subgoal unfolding I_def by auto
subgoal unfolding I_def by auto
subgoal unfolding E_def by auto
proof (goal_cases)
fix s::state and l
assume I: "I l s" and 2: "1 + s ''l'' < s ''r''"
from I obtain k :: nat where 3: "s ''r'' - s ''l'' = 2 ^ k" and 4: "s ''l'' ≥ 0" unfolding I_def by blast
from 3 2 have "k>0" using gr0I by force
then obtain k' where k': "k=k'+1" by (metis Suc_eq_plus1 Suc_pred)
from 3 k' have R1: " s ''r'' - (s ''l'' + s ''r'') div 2 = 2 ^ k'" and
R2: "(s ''l'' + s ''r'') div 2 - s ''l'' = 2 ^ k'" by auto
then have E1: "∃k. s ''r'' - (s ''l'' + s ''r'') div 2 = 2 ^ k" and
E2: "∃k. (s ''l'' + s ''r'') div 2 - s ''l'' = 2 ^ k" by auto
then show "I l (s(''l'' := (s ''l'' + s ''r'') div 2, ''m'' := 0))" and
"I l (s(''r'' := (s ''l'' + s ''r'') div 2, ''m'' := 0))" using 2 4 unfolding I_def by auto
show "Suc (Suc (Suc (Suc (Suc (E (s(''l'' := (s ''l'' + s ''r'') div 2, ''m'' := 0))))))) ≤ E s"
unfolding E_def apply simp unfolding R1 3 k' by (auto simp: nat_power_eq nat_mult_distrib)
show "Suc (Suc (Suc (Suc (Suc (E (s(''r'' := (s ''l'' + s ''r'') div 2, ''m'' := 0))))))) ≤ E s"
unfolding E_def apply simp unfolding R2 3 k' by (auto simp: nat_power_eq nat_mult_distrib)
next
fix l s
show "Suc 0 ≤ E s" unfolding E_def by auto
show "Suc 0 ≤ E s" unfolding E_def by auto
qed
next
fix s
show "(∃k>0. ∀l s. P l s ⟶ pre ?C Q l s ∧ time ?C s ≤ k * e s)"
apply(rule exI[where x=100])
unfolding P R_def I_def E_def e by (auto simp: nat_power_eq absch)
qed
(auto simp: Q support_inv R_def I_def)
from s v show ?thesis by simp
qed
end