Theory HOL-Library.Function_Division

(*  Title:      HOL/Library/Function_Division.thy
    Author:     Florian Haftmann, TUM
*)

section ‹Pointwise instantiation of functions to division›

theory Function_Division
imports Function_Algebras
begin

subsection ‹Syntactic with division›

instantiation "fun" :: (type, inverse) inverse
begin

definition "inverse f = inverse ∘ f"

definition "f div g = (λx. f x / g x)"

instance ..

end

lemma inverse_fun_apply [simp]:
  "inverse f x = inverse (f x)"
  by (simp add: inverse_fun_def)

lemma divide_fun_apply [simp]:
  "(f / g) x = f x / g x"
  by (simp add: divide_fun_def)

text ‹
  Unfortunately, we cannot lift this operations to algebraic type
  classes for division: being different from the constant
  zero function \<^term>‹f ≠ 0› is too weak as precondition.
  So we must introduce our own set of lemmas.
›

abbreviation zero_free :: "('b ⇒ 'a::field) ⇒ bool" where
  "zero_free f ≡ ¬ (∃x. f x = 0)"

lemma fun_left_inverse:
  fixes f :: "'b ⇒ 'a::field"
  shows "zero_free f ⟹ inverse f * f = 1"
  by (simp add: fun_eq_iff)

lemma fun_right_inverse:
  fixes f :: "'b ⇒ 'a::field"
  shows "zero_free f ⟹ f * inverse f = 1"
  by (simp add: fun_eq_iff)

lemma fun_divide_inverse:
  fixes f g :: "'b ⇒ 'a::field"
  shows "f / g = f * inverse g"
  by (simp add: fun_eq_iff divide_inverse)

text ‹Feel free to extend this.›

text ‹
  Another possibility would be a reformulation of the division type
  classes to user a \<^term>‹zero_free› predicate rather than
  a direct \<^term>‹a ≠ 0› condition.
›

end